JARDIANCE Regulartory Post Marketing Surveillance in Korean Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

April 15, 2021 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

A Regulatory Requirement Non Interventional Study to Monitor the Safety and Effectiveness of JARDIANCE® (Empagliflozin, 10mg, 25mg, q.d.) in Korean Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

To monitor the safety profile and effectiveness of Empagliflozin in Korea patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a routine clinical practice setting

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

3368

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 110 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

type 2 diabetes mellitus in Korea

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Patients who have been started on JARDIANCE® in accordance with the approved label in Korea
  2. Age = 19 years at enrolment
  3. Patients who have signed on the data release consent form

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Known hypersensitivity to empagliflozin or any of its excipients
  2. Patients with type 1 diabetes or for the treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis
  3. Patients with persistent estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2,end stage renal disease or on dialysis
  4. Patients with rare hereditary conditions of galactose intolerance, the Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption
  5. Patients for whom empagliflozin is contraindicated according local label of JARDIANCE®

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
JARDIANCE
T2DM with JARDIANCE
T2DM with JARDIANCE 10mg
MT2DM with JARDIANCE 25mgax

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Any Adverse Events
Time Frame: From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study), up to 544 days.
Percentage of participants with any adverse events was reported. The 95% Confidence Interval for the percentage of participants with adverse events was calculated by Exact Method.
From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study), up to 544 days.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events Relating to Study Drug
Time Frame: From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study), up to 544 days.
Percentage of participants with adverse events relating to study drug was reported. The 95% Confidence Interval for the percentage of participants with adverse events was calculated by Exact Method.
From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study), up to 544 days.
Percentage of Participants With Unexpected Adverse Events
Time Frame: From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study), up to 544 days.
Percentage of participants with unexpected adverse events was reported. The 95% Confidence Interval for the percentage of participants with adverse events was calculated by Exact Method.
From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study), up to 544 days.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest
Time Frame: From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study), up to 544 days.

Percentage of participants with adverse events of special interest (AESI) was reported. The 95% Confidence Interval for the percentage of participants with adverse events was calculated by Exact Method.

The following are considered as AESIs:

  • Vaginal moniliasis, vulvovaginitis, balanitis and other genital infection
  • Increased urination
  • Urinary tract infection (UTI)
  • Volume depletion
  • Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)
  • Decreased renal function:
  • Hepatic injury
  • Lower limb amputation
From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study), up to 544 days.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of the Drug
Time Frame: From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study), up to 544 days.
Percentage of participants with adverse events leading to discontinuation of the drug was reported. The 95% Confidence Interval for the percentage of participants with adverse events was calculated by Exact Method.
From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study), up to 544 days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Last Visit
Time Frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at the last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study, up to day 544).
Change from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at last visit.
At baseline (Visit 1) and at the last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study, up to day 544).
Number of Patients Who Had Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Reaching Less Than 7% (Target Efficacy Response Rate) at the Last Visit
Time Frame: At the last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study, up to day 544).
Number of patients who had glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reaching less than 7% (target efficacy response rate) at the last visit.
At the last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study, up to day 544).
Number of Patients With Relative Effectiveness Response in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (Decrease by at Least 0.5% Comparing to Baseline) at the Last Visit
Time Frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at the last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study, up to day 544).
Number of patients with relative effectiveness response in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (decrease by at least 0.5% comparing to baseline) at the last visit
At baseline (Visit 1) and at the last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study, up to day 544).
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Last Visit
Time Frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at the last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study, up to day 544).
Change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at last visit.
At baseline (Visit 1) and at the last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study, up to day 544).
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Last Visit
Time Frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at the last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study, up to day 544).
Change from baseline in body weight at last visit.
At baseline (Visit 1) and at the last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study, up to day 544).
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Last Visit
Time Frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at the last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study, up to day 544).
Change from baseline in systolic blood pressure (SBP) at last visit.
At baseline (Visit 1) and at the last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study, up to day 544).
Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Last Visit
Time Frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at the last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study, up to day 544).
Change from baseline in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at last visit.
At baseline (Visit 1) and at the last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study, up to day 544).
Number of Participants Per Final Effectiveness Assessment Category at Last Visit
Time Frame: At the last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study, up to day 544).
Number of participants per final effectiveness assessment category at last visit was reported. The final effeciveness consisted of 4 categories: Improved (If determined as there was any effect of maintaining or improving disease related factors.), Unchanged (If disease related factors had not been changed compared with before administration, and not determined as there was any effect of maintaining symptoms.), Aggravated (If disease related factors were worse than before administration.), and Unassessable (If it cannot be determined due to insufficient information collected.).
At the last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually attended during the study, up to day 544).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 10, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 17, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 17, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 29, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 11, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Clinical Trials on JARDIANCE 10mg

3
Subscribe