Evaluation of Spine Surgery Analgesic Pathway

December 15, 2020 updated by: Kamal Maheshwari, MD MPH, The Cleveland Clinic

Evaluation of Spine Surgery Analgesic Pathway: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Investigators plan to study the role of spine surgery analgesic pathways - for procedures with high risk of postoperative pain - in improving the quality of recovery

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a randomized controlled trial comparing "spine surgery analgesic pathway" with "usual care" in improving postoperative quality of recovery and pain management in spine surgery patients. At the time of surgery office visit or at the time of preoperative assessment by anesthesia care team, risk factor for suboptimal pain management will be identified and documented. Patients will be assessed at the time for surgical office visit for their risk for severe post-operative pain. Patients with 2 or more risk factors will be classified as high-risk for severe postoperative pain and the patients with less than 2 factors as low risk. After obtaining informed consent spine surgery patients will be randomized 1:1 in one of the 2 study groups on the day of the surgery:

  1. "Usual care" group A
  2. "Care pathway" group B

If the participant is randomized to the "spine surgery analgesic pathway" group the participant will be evaluated by the Acute Pain Management Service (APMS) before the surgery for their specific pain management needs. The participant will also get some additional medication for pain in preoperative and intraoperative period. Before surgery the participant will receive Acetaminophen and Gabapentin pills. During the surgery, once the participant is asleep the participant will receive an infusion of ketamine and lidocaine through the participant venous line. After the surgery the participant will receive pain medications as per current standard protocol including acetaminophen and gabapentin. Pain management team specialist will follow for pain control after a surgery as needed.

If the participant is randomized to the "usual care" group the participant will be given placebo preoperatively; the rest of the time pain medication will be provided in a routine manner as per the anesthesia care team and the surgical team. Pain management team specialist will follow for pain control after a surgery as needed.

The primary outcome will be assessed on post-operative day 3: The participants will complete a short survey about quality of recovery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

299

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 to 80 years old at time of surgery - Adult patients differ from pediatric patients in that adult spines are stiffer than pediatric patients.
  • Posterior spine surgery
  • Surgery performed at Cleveland Clinic main campus

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy or hypersensitivity to lidocaine, ketamine, acetaminophen, gabapentin
  • Current or recent drug abuse (within past 6 months)
  • Pregnancy
  • Immune system disease such as HIV, AIDS
  • Undergoing immunosuppressive treatment
  • Recent history of sepsis
  • Contraindications to lidocaine such as heart block and hepatic insufficiency
  • Heart failure with ejection fraction less than 30%
  • Liver dysfunction manifested with increased liver enzymes to double the normal and INR of 2 or higher

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Spine surgery analgesic pathway

Before surgery the subject will be given one time oral dose Acetaminophen (1000 mg ) and gabapentin (600 mg).

During surgery the subject will receive an infusion of ketamine (5 mcg/kg/min) and lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg/hr start before the incision and decreased to 1 mg/kg/hr at start of closing and continued to PACU and stop at the first oral intake).

After surgery, the surgical team will manage pain medication and will consult acute pain management team as needed.

Enhanced pain management care
Active Comparator: Usual care

Placebo- Before surgery the subject will be given one time placebo oral dose Acetaminophen (1000 mg ) and gabapentin (600 mg).

Placebo- During surgery the subject will receive a placebo infusion of - ketamine (5 mcg/kg/min) and lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg/hr start at incision and decreased to 1 mg/kg/hr at start of closing and continued to PACU and stop at the first oral intake).

After surgery, the surgical team will manage pain medication and will consult acute pain management team as needed.

Standard of pain management care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Recovery
Time Frame: Three days after surgery
Assessment of postoperative recovery should be multidimensional including physiological parameters, functional recovery parameters, and patient-reported outcomes. Quality of postoperative recovery will be assessed by asking the patient "how have you been feeling during the past 24 hours." Using the Quality of recovery form (QoR15) to document their replies. Quality of recovery (QoR15) score of (0 to 10), where: (0) none of the time (poor) and (10) equal all of the time (excellent). There are a total of 15 questions with each score ranging from 0 to 10. The range of reported total score is 0-150 where higher scores mean better quality of recovery.
Three days after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opioid Utilization
Time Frame: up to 48 hours
Opioid consumption within the initial 48 h was converted to IV morphine equivalents using the conversions specified in Supplemental Digital Content 1 (http:// links.lww.com/ALN/C178).
up to 48 hours
Time-weighted Pain Score
Time Frame: 15-min interval after surgery until postoperative 2 days or discharge, whichever came first
Postoperative pain was evaluated with numeric rating scores (0-10) at 15-min intervals for the initial two postoperative hours or until discharge, whichever came first. A time-weighted averages pain score is equal to the sum of the portion of each time interval (as a decimal, such as 0.25h) multiplied by the levels of the pain (0-10 numeric rating scores) during the time period divided by 48h.
15-min interval after surgery until postoperative 2 days or discharge, whichever came first
Opioid-related Side Effects Score POD1 (Postoperative Day 1)
Time Frame: POD1
Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale (ORSDS) evaluates opioid-related side effects. ORSDS is a 4-point scale that evaluates 3 symptom distress dimensions (frequency, severity, bothersomeness) for 12 opioid-related side effects. The mean of the 12 scores are reported with a range from 0-4 where the higher scores mean more opioid-related side effects.
POD1
Opioid-related Side Effects Score POD2 (Postoperative Day 2)
Time Frame: POD2
Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale (ORSDS) evaluates opioid-related side effects. ORSDS is a 4-point scale that evaluates 3 symptom distress dimensions (frequency, severity, bothersomeness) for 12 opioid-related side effects. The mean of the 12 scores are reported with a range from 0-4 where the higher scores mean more opioid-related side effects.
POD2

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Exploratory Outcome Measurement Patient Satisfaction With Pain Management at Discharge From the Hospital (Numeric Rating System 1-100)
Time Frame: POD 3 (72 hours) or discharge, whichever comes earlier
The patient satisfaction with pain management at discharge using (NRS 1-100) or on POD 3 or discharge, whichever comes earlier. The higher score means a better outcome
POD 3 (72 hours) or discharge, whichever comes earlier
Exploratory Outcome Measurement Quality of Recovery (QoR) Score at 1 Months
Time Frame: At 1 months
Quality of postoperative recovery will be assessed by asking the patient "how have you been feeling during the past 24 hours." Using the Quality of recovery form (QoR15) to document their replies. Quality of recovery (QoR15) score of (0 to 10), where: (0) none of the time (poor) and (10) equal all of the time (excellent). There are a total of 15 questions with each score ranging from 0 to 10. The range of reported total score is 0-150 where higher scores mean better quality of recovery.
At 1 months
Exploratory to Measure PDQ (Pain Disability) Using EQ-5D
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
Using EQ-5D questionnaire for pain disability measurements, at 3 months with the flexibility of +/- 5 days using the EQ-5D questionnaire (0) no pain to (10) worst pain. EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health status developed by EuroQol GROUP
Up to 3 months
Exploratory to Measure Health-related Quality of Life Using EQ-5D
Time Frame: baseline
It is one of several instruments used to verify the quality-adjusted life years associated with a health state. It is defined as a survey instrument for measuring economic preferences for health states based on the assessment of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression (5 items in total). Each dimension has 3 levels: 1=no problem, 2=moderate problem, 3=severe problem. The total scores are calculated for each subject.
baseline
Exploratory Outcome: Chronic Postsurgical Pain at 3 Months (0-10 NRS Scale)
Time Frame: at 3 months
The exploratory outcome chronic postsurgical pain at 3 months was assessed by phone call using a numeric rating scale (0 to 10) where a score of 0 is "no pain" and a score of 10 is "pain as bad as it could be."
at 3 months
Exploratory Outcome: PACU Length of Stay (h)
Time Frame: from the time when patients were transferred to the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit to the time when patients were transferred out from the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit.
Postoperative-anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay measured how many hours the patient had spent in PACU.
from the time when patients were transferred to the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit to the time when patients were transferred out from the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit.
Exploratory Outcome: Number of Patients Who Had Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in PACU
Time Frame: postoperative time until discharge
Postoperative nausea and vomiting was assessed using Postoperative Nursing Progress Record (NPR) - Records nausea vomiting severity as 0=none, 1= mild, 2=moderate, 3= severe.
postoperative time until discharge
Exploratory Outcome: Postoperative Length of Hospital Stay (Days)
Time Frame: postoperative time until discharge
Postoperative length of hospital stay measured how many days the patient had spent in the hospital after surgery.
postoperative time until discharge
Exploratory Outcome: Need for Acute Pain Consultation, as Determined by Clinical Need
Time Frame: postoperative until discharge
The outcome measured how many patients needed acute pain consultation after the surgery, as determined by clinical need
postoperative until discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Daniel I Sessler, M.D., Department Chair

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 16, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 2, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 16-012

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Posterior Spine Surgery

Clinical Trials on Spine surgery analgesic pathway

3
Subscribe