To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 1146A Nasal Spray in Adult Participants With Symptoms of Common Cold

June 15, 2018 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

A Randomized, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 1146A Nasal Spray in Adult Subjects With Symptoms of Common Cold

This study will be conducted in adult participants with symptoms of common cold assessing if 1146A nasal spray reduces the severity of symptoms of the common cold compared to placebo. The study will also evaluate the safety of 1146A compared to placebo.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This will be a multi-center, randomized, parallel-group, double blind, 2-arm, placebo controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1146A in adult participants with symptomatic common cold in an outpatient setting.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

171

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35211
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Arizona
      • Chandler, Arizona, United States, 85224
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Mesa, Arizona, United States, 85206
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • California
      • Vista, California, United States, 92083
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Colorado
      • Centennial, Colorado, United States, 80112
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Littleton, Colorado, United States, 80128
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Florida
      • Pinellas Park, Florida, United States, 33781
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60602
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Iowa
      • Council Bluffs, Iowa, United States, 51503
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Minnesota
      • Edina, Minnesota, United States, 55435
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63141
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Nebraska
      • Elkhorn, Nebraska, United States, 68022
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Fremont, Nebraska, United States, 68025
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68144
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • New Jersey
      • Vineland, New Jersey, United States
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Ohio
      • Akron, Ohio, United States, 44311
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45249
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hatboro, Pennsylvania, United States, 19040
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • South Carolina
      • Anderson, South Carolina, United States, 29621
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75234
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Plano, Texas, United States, 75093
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Utah
      • Murray, Utah, United States, 84123
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Washington
      • Bellevue, Washington, United States, 98004
        • GSK Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Demonstrates understanding of the study procedures, restrictions and willingness to participate as evidenced by voluntary written informed consent and has received a signed and dated copy of the informed consent form.
  • Aged between 18 to 75 years inclusive.
  • Male or female.
  • Good general and mental health with, in the opinion of the Investigator or medically qualified designee no clinically significant and relevant abnormalities in medical history or upon physical and Investigator-led nasal examination.
  • Females of childbearing potential who are, in the opinion of the Investigator, practicing a reliable method of contraception. Adequate contraception is defined as abstinence, oral contraceptive, either combined or progestogen alone OR injectable progestogen OR implants of levonorgestrel OR estrogenic vaginal ring OR percutaneous contraceptive patches OR intrauterine device or intrauterine system OR double barrier method (condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical vault caps) plus spermicidal agent (foam, gel, film, cream, suppository)) OR male partner sterilization prior to the female participant's entry into the study, and this male is the sole partner for that participant.
  • Investigator confirmed diagnosis of symptomatic common cold with an onset of less than 48 hours prior to randomization. Symptomatic common cold is defined as TSS > 9 AND a score >1 for at least one of the following symptoms: sore throat, runny nose, or blocked nose.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who have a positive urine pregnancy test.
  • Women who are breast-feeding.
  • During the entire study (Screening - last participant visit):
  • A. Participant who have used medications or therapies that could interfere with study evaluations and have not had the proper washout period from these medications or therapies or are anticipated to require any concomitant intranasal medication during that period or at any time throughout the study.
  • B. Nasal disease(s) likely to affect deposition of intranasal medication, such as chronic sinusitis, rhinitis medicamentosa, clinically significant polyposis, or clinically significant nasal structural abnormalities.
  • C. Nasal surgery or sinus surgery within the previous year.
  • D. Any condition that prohibits the participant from actuating nasal spray devices (severe rheumatoid arthritis; deformed hands and fingers; missing fingers).
  • E. Clinically relevant abnormal physical findings which, in the opinion of the Investigator or sponsor's medical monitor, would interfere with the objectives of the study or that may preclude compliance with the study procedures.
  • F. Uncontrolled cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, hematological, endocrine, metabolic, autoimmune, neurological, psychiatric or other diseases at screening that would interfere with the study in the opinion of the Investigator.
  • G. Participants with seasonal allergic rhinitis if randomization occurs during their expected allergy season or perennial allergic rhinitis.
  • H. Severe COPD, persistent asthma, or recent COPD/asthma exacerbation.
  • I. An inability to comprehend and satisfactorily use the measurement instruments as determined by the study sites staff on screening.
  • J. Participants with a fever > 38°C (100.4°F).
  • K. Frequent uses of analgesics (i.e. have taken an analgesic for pain in headache and pain in muscle/joints for at least 1 dose per week on average over the past 6 months).
  • Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to any of the study medications, excipients or investigational device material or to medications of similar chemical classes, any history of drug hypersensitivity or other significant allergic diathesis that could affect study participation and known or suspected contraindications, including history of allergy or photosensitivity to study medication/s.
  • Participation in another clinical study (including cosmetic studies) or receipt of an investigational drug within 30 days of the screening visit or 5 half-lives of enrollment, whichever is longer and previous participation in this study (i.e. participants cannot be re-screened or randomized).

Recent history (within the last 5 years) of alcohol or other substance abuse and positive urine drug screen.

  • An employee of the sponsor or the study sites or members of their immediate family and persons directly or indirectly involved in the execution of this protocol, including employees of the contract research organization (CRO) and persons related to them.
  • On nasal examination by Investigator, the presence of nasal disease likely to affect deposition of intranasal treatment or any superficial or moderate nasal mucosal erosion, nasal mucosal ulceration, or nasal septum perforation at the screening visit. Participants with difficulty in using the nasal spray applicator, "vulnerable" individual (as defined by the IRB e.g. incarcerated person) and any condition not identified in the protocol that in the opinion of the Investigator would confound the evaluation and interpretation of the study data or may put the participant at risk.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Carbomer 980 (1146A)
Participants will be administered test product (nasal spray) containing carbomer 980 gel. Three actuations per nostril per dose will be applied, each actuation will be 140µL (microliters) i.e. equivalent to 140mg.
Test product containing carbomer 980 gel
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
Participants will be administered reference product (nasal spray) containing vehicle without carbomer 980. Three actuations of placebo nasal spray per nostril per dose; each actuation will be 140µL.
Reference product containing vehicle without carbomer 980 gel

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average Nasal Symptom Score Over Days 1-4 (ANSS1-4)
Time Frame: Up to Day 4 (Day 1 to 4)
The nasal symptom score (NSS) was calculated as the sum score of the nasal symptoms (runny nose, blocked nose and sneezing). The participants self-assessed each individual sign/symptom which was scored using the following 4-point scale: 0 = absent symptoms (no sign/symptom evident), 1 = mild symptoms (sign/symptom clearly present, but minimal awareness; easily tolerated), 2 = moderate symptoms (definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome but tolerable), 3 = severe symptoms (sign/symptom that is hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping);score range (Min-Max): 0-9 . The average nasal symptom score (ANSS) on days 1 to 4 was calculated as the mean of the 4 daily NSS across study days 1 to 4. A lower score reflects better nasal symptoms.
Up to Day 4 (Day 1 to 4)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average Nasal Symptom Score Over Days 1-7 (ANSS1-7)
Time Frame: Up to Day 7 (Day 1 to 7)
The nasal symptom score (NSS) was calculated as the sum score of the nasal symptoms (runny nose, blocked nose and sneezing). The participants self-assessed each individual sign/symptom which was scored using the following 4-point scale: 0 = absent symptoms (no sign/symptom evident), 1 = mild symptoms (sign/symptom clearly present, but minimal awareness; easily tolerated), 2 = moderate symptoms (definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome but tolerable), 3 = severe symptoms (sign/symptom that is hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping);score range (Min-Max): 0-9 . The average nasal symptom score (ANSS) on days 1 to 7 was calculated as the mean of the 7 daily NSS across study days 1 to 7. A lower score reflects better nasal symptoms.
Up to Day 7 (Day 1 to 7)
Average Total Symptom Score Over Days 1-4 (ATSS1-4)
Time Frame: Up to Day 4 (Day 1 to 4)
The total symptom scores (TSS) were calculated as the sum score of the nasal symptoms (runny nose, blocked nose and sneezing) and other symptoms (headache, muscle ache, chills, sore throat and cough). The participants self-assessed each individual sign/symptom which was scored using the following 4 point scale: 0 = absent symptoms (no sign/symptom evident), 1 = mild symptoms (sign/symptom clearly present, but minimal awareness; easily tolerated), 2 = moderate symptoms (definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome but tolerable), 3 = severe symptoms (sign/symptom that is hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping);Score range (Min-Max):0-24. Average Total Symptom Score (ATSS) on days 1 to 4 were derived as the mean of all TSS across study Days 1 to 4. A lower score reflects better nasal symptoms.
Up to Day 4 (Day 1 to 4)
Average Total Symptom Score Over Days 1-7 (ATSS1-7)
Time Frame: Up to Day 7 (Day 1 to 7)
The total symptom scores (TSS) were calculated as the sum score of the nasal symptoms (runny nose, blocked nose and sneezing) and other symptoms (headache, muscle ache, chills, sore throat and cough). The participants self-assessed each individual sign/symptom which was scored using the following 4 point scale: 0 = absent symptoms (no sign/symptom evident), 1 = mild symptoms (sign/symptom clearly present, but minimal awareness; easily tolerated), 2 = moderate symptoms (definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome but tolerable), 3 = severe symptoms (sign/symptom that is hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping);Score range (Min-Max):0-24. Average Total Symptom Score (ATSS) on days 1 to 7 were derived as the mean of all TSS across study Days 1 to 7. A lower score reflects better nasal symptoms.
Up to Day 7 (Day 1 to 7)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 29, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 7, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 7, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 29, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Common Cold

Clinical Trials on Carbomer 980 (1146A)

3
Subscribe