Antimicrobial Treatment in Patients With Ventilator-associated Tracheobronchitis (TAVeM2)

August 16, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Lille

Antimicrobial Treatment in Patients With Ventilator-associated Tracheobronchitis: a Prospective Randomized Placebo-controlled Double-blind Multicenter Trial

Antimicrobial treatment could be beneficial in patients with ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT). The hypothesis of this study is that antibiotic treatment for VAT (3 or 7 days), compared with no antibiotic treatment, would reduce the incidence of transition from VAT to ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The main objective of this randomized controlled multicenter double-blind trial is to assess the efficiency of two durations (3 or 7 days) of antibiotic treatment for VAT, compared with no antibiotic treatment, in reducing the incidence of transition from VAT to ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

Secondary objectives are to determine the impact of two durations (3 or 7 days) of antibiotic treatment for VAT, compared with no antibiotic treatment, on:

  • duration of mechanical-ventilation free days
  • duration of antibiotic free days
  • length of ICU stay
  • mortality at day 28 and day 90
  • incidence of ICU-acquired colonization related to multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria
  • incidence of ICU-acquired infection related to MDR bacteria
  • incidence of ventilator-associated events After informed consent, patients will be randomized (1:1:1) to receive 0 (control group), 3 or 7 days (experimental groups) of antibiotic treatment for VAT

Antibiotic treatment is standardized, based on the time of onset of VAT, and presence of risk factors for MDR bacteria:

  • patients with early-onset VAT with no risk factor for MDR bacteria will receive ceftriaxone (2 g iv every 24h).
  • patients with late-onset VAT (after day 4 of mechanical ventilation), or with at least one risk factor for MDR bacteria will receive imipenem (1 g iv every 8h), and ciprofloxacin (400 mg iv every 8h) as empirical treatment. When methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is suspected, linezolid (600 mg iv every 12h) will be added to empirical treatment.

Patients randomized in control group will receive 7 days of placebo, and those randomized in the first experimental arm (3 days of antibiotics) will receive 4 days of placebo.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

154

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Lille, France
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Roger Salengro, CHRU

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All adult patients hospitalized in the ICU with a first episode of VAT diagnosed >48 hours after starting invasive mechanical ventilation are eligible for this study.

VAT is defined using the following criteria:

  1. absence of new infiltrate on chest X ray
  2. two of the three following conditions: fever > 38.5 °C or <36.5, leucocyte count > than 12 000 cells per μL or <than 4000 cells per μL purulent tracheal secretions
  3. and positive tracheal aspirate (≥105 cfu/mL)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • long-term tracheostomy at ICU admission
  • patients who develop VAP before VAT
  • patients already receiving antibiotics active against all the microorganisms responsible for VAT
  • severe immunosuppression
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • patients <18 years
  • patients already included in another study, with potential interaction with the primary objective of the current study
  • known resistance to imipenem and ciprofloxacin of bacteria responsible for VAT
  • treatment limitation decisions
  • moribund patients (likely to die within 24 h)
  • allergy to any of study drugs: hypersensitivity to any carbapenem, severe hypersensitivity (for example anaphylactic reaction or severe cutaneous reaction) to any other antibiotic form beta-lactam group (such as penicillin or cephalosporin), severe hypersensitivity (for example anaphylactic reaction) to any other antibiotic from beta-lactam group (penicillin, monobactam or carbapenem), hypersensitivity to quinolones

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: no antibiotic treatment for VAT
3 days of placebo
The SSI 0.9% or dextrose 5% used are based on routine procedure in different participating centers.Placebo will be prepared using IV bags, with the same of quantity as IMP
EXPERIMENTAL: antibiotic treatment for 3 days

Patients randomized in one of the two experimental groups will receive 3 days of antimicrobials. Antibiotic treatment is standardized, based on the time of onset of VAT, and presence of risk factors for MDR bacteria:

  • patients with early-onset VAT (< 5 days of mechanical ventilation), with no risk factor for MDR will receive ceftriaxone .
  • patients with late-onset VAT (≥5 days of mechanical ventilation), or with at least one risk factor for multidrug resistant bacteria will receive imipenem , and ciprofloxacin as empirical treatment.

When methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is suspected linezolid will be added to empirical treatment.

3 days of imipenem and ciprofloxacin with optional linezolid, followed by 4 d of placebo

The SSI 0.9% or dextrose 5% used are based on routine procedure in different participating centers.Placebo will be prepared using IV bags, with the same of quantity as IMP
2 g iv every 24h
400 mg iv every 8h
1 g iv every 8h
600 mg iv every 12h

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The percentage of patients with a transition from VAT to VAP,
Time Frame: from randomization to day 28 (4 weeks)

VAP is defined using the following criteria:

  1. new or progressive pulmonary infiltrate
  2. two of the following criteria: temperature >38°C or <36.5°C leukocyte count >12,000/μL or <4,000/μL purulent endotracheal aspirate
  3. positive tracheal aspirate (≥105 cfu/mL) or bronchoalveolar lavage (≥104 cfu/mL).

VAP will be considered as subsequent to VAT, when it is diagnosed >24h after VAT occurrence. Only first episodes of VAP diagnosed >48h after starting mechanical ventilation will be taken into account.

from randomization to day 28 (4 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
duration of mechanical ventilation-free days
Time Frame: from randomization to day 28 (4 weeks)
from randomization to day 28 (4 weeks)
duration of antibiotic free-days
Time Frame: from randomization to day 28 (4 weeks)
from randomization to day 28 (4 weeks)
length of ICU stay
Time Frame: from randomization to day 28 (4 weeks)
from randomization to day 28 (4 weeks)
mortality
Time Frame: at day 28 and day 90 after randomization
at day 28 and day 90 after randomization
percentage of patients with ICU-acquired colonization related to MDR bacteria
Time Frame: from randomization to day 28 (4 weeks)
from randomization to day 28 (4 weeks)
percentage of patients with ventilator-associated events
Time Frame: from randomization to day 28 (4 weeks)
from randomization to day 28 (4 weeks)
percentage of patients with ICU-acquired infection related to MDR bacteria
Time Frame: from randomization to day 28 (4 weeks)
from randomization to day 28 (4 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 8, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2017

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 17, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

Clinical Trials on placebo

3
Subscribe