Multiple Daily Condensed Tannin Supplementation and Iron Bioavailability: The Tannin Dose Response Trial

January 24, 2017 updated by: Brian Lindshield, Kansas State University

Long-term, Multiple Daily Condensed Tannin Supplementation in Increasing Concentrations Does Not Affect Iron Status or Bioavailability: Results From the Tannin-dose Response Trial.

Tannins are known to inhibit iron absorption through formation of insoluble tannin-mineral complexes, and have thus been termed 'antinutritional.' Despite this, there is evidence that adaptation to similar antinutritional factors is possible when consumed over time. Limitations in current studies include short (single meal) duration, and use of incongruent tannin types from the condensed tannins that are commonly consumed. If adaptation to tannins does happen, it may be due to salivary proline-rich proteins, which have been found to be protective of iron status in animal models. The primary objectives of this study are: 1) To determine whether condensed tannins impact iron bioavailability or status when consumed in multi-dose, multiple daily supplements and 2) to test whether salivary protein production may impact iron bioavailability with tannin supplementation. Secondary objectives included assessment of the reliability of astringency as a measure of salivary protein production and iron absorption.

The study has been conducted in an iron absorption study of 11 women, aged 18-35 years old, to determine iron bioavailability with supplementation of 0.03, 0.25, and 1.5 g 95% proanthocyanidin rich grape seed extract before and after regular, three times daily supplementation for four weeks. Each participant consumed all three concentrations of supplement over the 26-week study, with a two-week washout between interventions. Direct iron absorption was measured using area under the curve. Iron status was measured by changes in hemoglobin and ferritin, and was adjusted by participant c-reactive protein levels. Salivary samples were collected before and after supplement consumption during meal challenges, and analyzed on HPLC. Astringency testing was conducted at the end of each meal challenge. Iron absorption and status markers were analyzed by ANOVA, and mixed-modeling followed by pairwise comparison by least significant differences. Pearson's correlations were used to correlated salivary proteins and astringency with iron bioavailability.

The present study will provide important information regarding the approximate influence of condensed tannin consumption on iron bioavailability and storage over time, at different doses. Data will also help to delineate possible physiological mechanisms underlying tannin adaptation and possible ways to detect individuals who better adapt than others.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

11

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kansas
      • Manhattan, Kansas, United States, 66502
        • Physical Activity and Nutrition Research Consortium

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 33 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female, 18-35 years old
  • Non-obese BMI (18-29.9)
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Oral disease
  • Gastrointestinal disease
  • Tobacco user
  • Heavy alcohol user
  • Pregnancy (assessed by pregnancy test)
  • Lactation
  • Medications affecting iron bioavailability
  • Vitamin or mineral supplementation (other than vitamin B12)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 0.03 mg 95% condensed proanthocyanidin
0.03 g 95% condensed proanthocyanidins from grape seed extract at week 0 0.03 g 95% condensed proanthocyanidins from grape seed extract at week 4
0.03, 0.25, and 1.5 g 95% condensed proanthocyanidins from grape seed extract consumed three times daily for 4 weeks each
Experimental: 0.25 g 95% condensed proanthocyanidin
0.25 g 95% condensed proanthocyanidins from grape seed extract at week 0 0.25 g 95% condensed proanthocyanidins from grape seed extract at week 4
0.03, 0.25, and 1.5 g 95% condensed proanthocyanidins from grape seed extract consumed three times daily for 4 weeks each
Experimental: 1.5 g 95% condensed proanthocyanidin
1.5 g 95% condensed proanthocyanidins from grape seed extract at week 0 1.5 g 95% condensed proanthocyanidins from grape seed extract at week 4
0.03, 0.25, and 1.5 g 95% condensed proanthocyanidins from grape seed extract consumed three times daily for 4 weeks each

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in baseline to endline area under the curve after meal challenge at weeks 0 and 4 of each intervention
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change in area under the curve will be measured after administration of test meal including ferrous sulfate and condensed tannin supplementation at weeks 0 and 4
Baseline and 4 weeks
Change in baseline to endline hemoglobin and serum ferritin at weeks 0 and 4 of each intervention
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change in ferritin and hemoglobin will be measured before administration of test meals at weeks 0 and 4
Baseline and 4 weeks
Change in salivary proteins at weeks 0 and 4 of each intervention
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
HPLC determination of salivary proteins will be analyzed from saliva collected before and after test meals at weeks 0 and 4 of each intervention
Baseline and 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brian L Lindshield, Ph.D., Kansas State University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 25, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 10, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 10, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 25, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Iron-deficiency

Clinical Trials on 95% condensed proanthocyanidins from grape seed extract

3
Subscribe