- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03070782
Phase 2 Study of ISIS 681257 (AKCEA-APO(a)-LRx) in Participants With Hyperlipoproteinemia(a) and Cardiovascular Disease
October 26, 2020 updated by: Akcea Therapeutics
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Phase 2 Study of ISIS 681257 (AKCEA-APO(a)-LRx) Administered Subcutaneously to Patients With Hyperlipoproteinemia(a) and Established Cardiovascular Disease (CVD)
This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study to evaluate the safety, including tolerability, of ISIS 681257 and to assess the efficacy of different doses and dosing regimens of ISIS 681257 for reduction of plasma Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels in participants with hyperlipoproteinemia(a) and established cardiovascular disease (CVD).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
286
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ottawa, Canada, K1Y4W7
- Clinical Site
-
-
Quebec
-
Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada, G7H7K9
- Clinical Site
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H1T 1C8
- Clinical Site
-
Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H3H 2L9
- Clinical Site
-
Québec, Quebec, Canada, G1V4W2
- Clinical Site
-
-
-
-
-
Herlev, Denmark, 2730
- Clinical Site
-
Viborg, Denmark, 8800
- Clinical Site
-
-
-
-
-
Berlin, Germany, 13353
- Clinical Site
-
Cologne, Germany, 50937
- Clinical Site
-
-
-
-
-
Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105AZ
- Clinical Site
-
-
-
-
Arizona
-
Cottonwood, Arizona, United States, 86326
- Clinical Site
-
-
California
-
Huntington Beach, California, United States, 92648
- Clinical Site
-
La Jolla, California, United States, 92103
- Clinical Site
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
- Clinical Site
-
Stanford, California, United States, 94305
- Clinical Site
-
-
Colorado
-
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States, 80909
- Clinical Site
-
-
Florida
-
Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 33434
- Clinical Site
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32216
- Clinical Site
-
-
Kansas
-
Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
- Clinical Site
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
- Clinical Site
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
- Clinical Site
-
-
New York
-
Cooperstown, New York, United States, 13326
- Clinical Site
-
New York, New York, United States, 10016
- Clinical Site
-
New York, New York, United States, 10029
- Clinical Site
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
- Clinical Site
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
- Clinical Site
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States, 17602
- Clinical Site
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
- Clinical Site
-
-
Rhode Island
-
Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02906
- Clinical Site
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- Clinical Site
-
-
Virginia
-
Falls Church, Virginia, United States, 22042
- Clinical Site
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53215
- Clinical Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Key Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of CVD defined as documented coronary artery disease, stroke, or peripheral artery disease
- Lp(a) plasma level ≥ 60 mg/dL
- Must be on standard-of-care preventative therapy for other than elevated Lp(a) CVD risk factors
Key Exclusion Criteria:
- Within 6 months of Screening: acute coronary syndrome, major cardiac surgery, or stroke/TIA
- Within 3 months of Screening: coronary, carotid, or peripheral arterial revascularization, major non-cardiac surgery, or lipoprotein apheresis
- Heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Cohort A: ISIS 681257: 20 mg Q4W
Cohort A participants received 20 milligrams (mg) ISIS 681257, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (Q4W), for up to 49 weeks and a maximum of 13 doses.
|
ISIS 681257 solution for SC injection.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Cohort B: ISIS 681257: 40 mg Q4W
Cohort B participants received 40 mg of ISIS 681257, SC injection, once Q4W, for up to 49 weeks and a maximum of 13 doses.
|
ISIS 681257 solution for SC injection.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Cohort C: ISIS 681257: 60 mg Q4W
Cohort C participants received 60 mg of ISIS 681257, SC injection, once Q4W, for up to 49 weeks and a maximum of 13 doses.
|
ISIS 681257 solution for SC injection.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Cohort D: ISIS 681257: 20 mg Q2W
Cohort D participants received 20 mg of ISIS 681257, SC injection, once every 2 weeks (Q2W), for up to 51 weeks and a maximum of 26 doses.
|
ISIS 681257 solution for SC injection.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Cohort E: ISIS 681257: 20 mg QW
Cohort E participants received 20 mg of ISIS 681257, SC injection, once weekly (QW), for up to 52 weeks and a maximum of 52 doses.
|
ISIS 681257 solution for SC injection.
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants in each cohort were randomized to receive placebo at a dose-matched volume of study drug (ISIS 681257).
|
Sterile normal saline (0.9% NaCl)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipoprotein A [Lp(a)] at the Primary Analysis Time Point
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 (Week 25 for Cohorts A, B and C and Week 27 for Cohorts D and E)
|
An ANCOVA model was performed on the log ratio of Lp(a) value at the Primary Analysis Time Point to Lp(a) value at Baseline.
The estimate of the log ratio was converted back to the original scale and percent change was calculated using formula: = (ratio of Lp(a) value at the Primary Analysis Time Point to Lp(a) value at Baseline - 1) × 100.
|
Baseline and Month 6 (Week 25 for Cohorts A, B and C and Week 27 for Cohorts D and E)
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks post treatment period (up to approximately 1.3 years)
|
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the study or use of investigational drug product, whether or not the AE was considered related to the investigational drug product.
TEAEs was defined as any AE with onset after the first administration of study medication through the end of the study, or any event that was present at baseline but worsened in intensity or was subsequently considered drug-related by the Investigator through the end of the study.
|
Up to 16 weeks post treatment period (up to approximately 1.3 years)
|
Number of Participants With TEAEs by Maximum Severity
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks post treatment period (up to approximately 1.3 years)
|
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the study or use of investigational drug product, whether or not the AE was considered related to the investigational drug product.
TEAEs was defined as any AE with onset after the first administration of study medication through the end of the study, or any event that was present at baseline but worsened in intensity or was subsequently considered drug-related by the Investigator through the end of the study.
The severity of TEAEs was assessed based on the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03.
TEAEs were graded on a 5-point scale where 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe, 4 = Potentially life-threatening and 5 = Death.
|
Up to 16 weeks post treatment period (up to approximately 1.3 years)
|
Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks post treatment period (up to approximately 1.3 years)
|
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the study or use of investigational drug product, whether or not the AE was considered related to the investigational drug product.
TEAE was defined as any AE with onset after the first administration of study medication through the end of the study, or any event that was present at baseline but worsened in intensity or was subsequently considered drug-related by the Investigator through the end of the study.
|
Up to 16 weeks post treatment period (up to approximately 1.3 years)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 (Week 25 for Cohorts A, B and C and Week 27 for Cohorts D and E)
|
An ANCOVA model was performed on the log ratio of LDL-C value at the Primary Analysis Time Point to LDL-C value at Baseline.
The estimate of the log ratio was converted back to the original scale and percent change was calculated using formula: = (ratio of LDL-C value at the Primary Analysis Time Point to LDL-C value at Baseline - 1) × 100.
|
Baseline and Month 6 (Week 25 for Cohorts A, B and C and Week 27 for Cohorts D and E)
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Plasma Lp(a) ≤ 125 Nanomoles Per Liter (Nmol/L) or ≤ 50 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL)
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 (Week 25 for Cohorts A, B and C and Week 27 for Cohorts D and E)
|
The percentage of participants who achieved ≤ 125 nmol/L or ≤ 50 mg/dL in fasting Lp(a) at the primary analysis time point were compared between each ISIS 681257 treatment group and pooled placebo group using a logistic regression model with log-transformed baseline Lp(a) as a covariate.
|
Baseline and Month 6 (Week 25 for Cohorts A, B and C and Week 27 for Cohorts D and E)
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Plasma Lp(a) ≤ 75 Nmol/L or ≤ 30 mg/dL
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 (Week 25 for Cohorts A, B and C and Week 27 for Cohorts D and E)
|
The percentage of participants who achieved ≤ 75 nmol/L or ≤ 30 mg/dL in fasting Lp(a) at the primary analysis time point were compared between each ISIS 681257 treatment group and pooled placebo group using a logistic regression model with log-transformed baseline Lp(a) as a covariate.
|
Baseline and Month 6 (Week 25 for Cohorts A, B and C and Week 27 for Cohorts D and E)
|
Percent Change From Baseline in the Plasma Levels of Apolipoprotein B (apoB)
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 (Week 25 for Cohorts A, B and C and Week 27 for Cohorts D and E)
|
An ANCOVA model was performed on the log ratio of apoB value at the Primary Analysis Time Point to apoB value at Baseline.
The estimate of the log ratio was converted back to the original scale and percent change was calculated using formula: = (ratio of apoB value at the Primary Analysis Time Point to apoB value at Baseline - 1) × 100.
|
Baseline and Month 6 (Week 25 for Cohorts A, B and C and Week 27 for Cohorts D and E)
|
Percent Change From Baseline in the Plasma Levels of Oxidized Phospholipids (OxPL) on Apolipoprotein(a) [OxPL-apo(a)]
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 (Week 25 for Cohorts A, B and C and Week 27 for Cohorts D and E)
|
An ANCOVA model was performed on the log ratio of OxPL-apo(a) value at the Primary Analysis Time Point to OxPL-apo(a) value at Baseline.
The estimate of the log ratio was converted back to the original scale and percent change was calculated using formula: = (ratio of OxPL-apo(a) value at the Primary Analysis Time Point to OxPL-apo(a) value at Baseline - 1) × 100.
|
Baseline and Month 6 (Week 25 for Cohorts A, B and C and Week 27 for Cohorts D and E)
|
Percent Change From Baseline in the Plasma Levels of Oxidized Phospholipids (OxPL) on Apolipoprotein B (OxPL-apoB)
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 (Week 25 for Cohorts A, B and C and Week 27 for Cohorts D and E)
|
An ANCOVA model was performed on the log ratio of OxPL-apoB value at the Primary Analysis Time Point to OxPL-apoB value at Baseline.
The estimate of the log ratio was converted back to the original scale and percent change was calculated using formula: = (ratio of OxPL-apoB value at the Primary Analysis Time Point to OxPL-apoB value at Baseline - 1) × 100.
|
Baseline and Month 6 (Week 25 for Cohorts A, B and C and Week 27 for Cohorts D and E)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
To Evaluate Plasma Cmax of ISIS 681257 Across Different Doses and Dose Regimens.
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Cmax will be calculated for the treatment groups.
|
6 months
|
To Evaluate Plasma Tmax of ISIS 681257 Across Different Doses and Dose Regimens.
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Tmax will be calculated for the treatment groups.
|
6 months
|
To Evaluate Plasma AUC Values of ISIS 681257 Across Different Doses and Dose Regimens.
Time Frame: 6 months
|
AUC values will be calculated for the treatment groups.
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Stiekema LCA, Prange KHM, Hoogeveen RM, Verweij SL, Kroon J, Schnitzler JG, Dzobo KE, Cupido AJ, Tsimikas S, Stroes ESG, de Winther MPJ, Bahjat M. Potent lipoprotein(a) lowering following apolipoprotein(a) antisense treatment reduces the pro-inflammatory activation of circulating monocytes in patients with elevated lipoprotein(a). Eur Heart J. 2020 Jun 21;41(24):2262-2271. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa171.
- Tsimikas S, Karwatowska-Prokopczuk E, Gouni-Berthold I, Tardif JC, Baum SJ, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Shapiro MD, Stroes ES, Moriarty PM, Nordestgaard BG, Xia S, Guerriero J, Viney NJ, O'Dea L, Witztum JL; AKCEA-APO(a)-LRx Study Investigators. Lipoprotein(a) Reduction in Persons with Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 16;382(3):244-255. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1905239. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 7, 2017
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 26, 2018
Study Completion (Actual)
November 13, 2018
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 31, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 28, 2017
First Posted (Actual)
March 6, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 30, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 26, 2020
Last Verified
October 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ISIS 681257-CS6
- 2016-003373-18 (EudraCT Number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Disease
-
University of FloridaUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham; Brown UniversityCompletedCardiovascular Disease | Psychosocial Influence on Cardiovascular DiseaseUnited States
-
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedCardiovascular Disease | Inflammatory DiseaseUnited States
-
Morehouse School of MedicineNot yet recruiting
-
Yonsei UniversityRecruitingCardiovascular DiseaseKorea, Republic of
-
Nanjing Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingCardiovascular Disease
-
National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)Active, not recruiting
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruiting
-
AmgenCompletedCardiovascular DiseaseUnited States, Australia
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentEnrolling by invitationCardiovascular DiseaseUnited States
Clinical Trials on ISIS 681257
-
Akcea TherapeuticsIonis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CompletedRenal ImpairmentUnited States, Canada
-
Akcea TherapeuticsCompletedCardiovascular Diseases | Elevated Lipoprotein(a)Canada
-
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CompletedHealthy ParticipantsUnited States
-
Akcea TherapeuticsCompletedCardiovascular Diseases | Elevated Lipoprotein(a)Canada
-
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CompletedElevated Lipoprotein(a)Netherlands, United Kingdom, Denmark, Germany, Canada
-
BiogenTerminatedSpinal Muscular AtrophyUnited States, Germany
-
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Completed
-
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CompletedHuntington's DiseaseCanada, United Kingdom, Germany
-
BiogenCompletedSpinal Muscular AtrophyUnited States
-
BiogenCompletedSpinal Muscular AtrophyUnited States, Canada