Rectus Sheath Block: Postoperative Analgesia and Proinflammatory Cytokines

February 21, 2018 updated by: Abdelrady S Ibrahim, MD, Assiut University

Effect of Rectus Sheath Block on Opioid Consumption and Serum Level of TNF-α and IL-6 After Radical Prostatectomy

Good quality of postoperative analgesia would lead to attenuate or prevent the adverse effects on the common functions of the immune system. We compared the effect of epidural analgesia versus rectus sheath block on postoperative pain and proinflammatory cytokines following malignant urological surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Study groups: 60 patients were included in the study randomly allocated into two groups of 30 patients. Rectus sheath group (RSB): Each patient received bilateral single shot ultrasound guided rectus sheath block under complete aseptic condition in a dose of 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% in each side immediately after induction of general anaesthesia. Control group: the patients did not receive any intervention after anaesthesia induction.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt
        • Assiut university faculty of medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Male patients their age over 40 years, classified ASA I, II or III, undergoing radical resection of cancer prostate, through midline abdominal incision under general anaesthesia.

Exclusion criteria:

Contraindications to rectus sheath block as patient refusal, coagulopathy, local infection and allergy to bupivacaine. Planned transverse or oblique abdominal incision, extensive existing midline abdominal scarring or pre-existing chronic abdominal pain.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Rectus Sheath
Each patient received bilateral single shot ultrasound guided rectus sheath block under complete aseptic condition in a dose of 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% in each side immediately after induction of general anaesthesia
Each patient received bilateral single shot ultrasound guided rectus sheath block under complete aseptic condition in a dose of 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% in each side immediately after induction of general anaesthesia
Other Names:
  • Plain marcaine
No Intervention: Control
Control group: the patients did not receive any intervention after anaesthesia induction.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cumulative opioid consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
study the effect of RSB on cumulative opioid consumption at 24 hours
24 hours postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numerical rating scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
evaluate postoperative pain intensity by NRS
24 hours postoperative
time to first anlgesic request
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
the first time receiving IV-PCA bolus injection
24 hours postoperative
serum levels of TNF-α
Time Frame: at 24 hours postoperative
Proinflamatory cytokines
at 24 hours postoperative
Serum level of IL-6
Time Frame: at 24 hours postoperative
Proinflamatory cytokines
at 24 hours postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Waleed S Farrag, Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 5, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

April 28, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 22, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine 0.25%

3
Subscribe