Two Monitors for Measuring the Activated Clotting Time: A Comparison

May 11, 2023 updated by: Umeå University

Comparison of Two Point of Care Techniques Mechanical Versus Biochemical Activated Clotting Time

In this observational study a comparison is made between two different monitors for measurement of the activated clotting time (ACT): mechanical versus biochemical techniques

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The ACT is a functional test influenced by multiple factors, such as platelet function, coagulation factors, temperature and contact activation inhibitors. Results produced by different monitors are also prone to vary influenced by the specific method employed to perform the test.

The present clinical study aims to compare two types of ACT monitors: the Hemostatic Management System Plus (Medtronic) and i-STAT (Abbott) in 20 cardiac surgical patients by performing five intraoperative consecutive measurements using anti factor Xa as a reference for the actual heparin concentration.

Inclusion criteria comprised patients aged 20-80 years, scheduled for coronary bypass surgery.

Measurements: 1) before induction of anaesthesia 2 ) after heparin bolus 3) rewarming of the patient 4) weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass 5) after protamine administration.

The Hemostatic System Plus ACT monitor served as reference for dosing of heparin in all patients. The study protocol did not intervene with the standard protocol used for anticoagulation. No patient interventions were made.

It is hypothesised that the i-STAT ACT monitor has a better correlation with the actual heparin concentration than the Hemostatic Management System Plus

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Umeå, Sweden, S-901 85
        • Heart Centre Umeå University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients admitted for routine coronary bypass surgery with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Patients listed for coronary bypass surgery, -

Exclusion Criteria: Primary coagulation disorder, diabetes mellitus, ongoing anti-coagulation therapy, emergency, reduced kidney function, allergy for fish, sea food and protamine

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
CABG Surgical Patients
Patients undergoing coronary bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass
Comparison between two point-of-care devices for measurement of the activated clotting time

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Activated Clotting time
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Coagulation Measure
Intraoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anti-Factor Xa
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Reference for heparin plasma concentration
Intraoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Magnus Hedström, MD, Heart Centre, Umeå University Hospital, Sweden

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 18, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017-HeartCentre-003

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Clinical Trials on Point-of-Care ACT

3
Subscribe