Artificial Intelligence for Optimal Anemia Management in End-stage Renal Disease: The Anemia Control Model (ACM) Trial (ANEMEX)

January 6, 2020 updated by: Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma

ANEMEX UK Trial: Artificial Intelligence for Optimal Anemia Management in End-stage Renal Disease: The Anemia Control Model (ACM) Trial

Fresenius Medical Care has developed a computer software programme called the Anaemia Control Management (ACM) software to assist in the anaemia management of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing hemodialysis. This trial is designed to assess the effectiveness of this ACM software on anaemia management in routine clinical practice. However, all ultimate decisions on therapeutic or diagnostic procedures, treatments, management of the disease, or resource utilisation will be at the discretion of the Investigator. The trial consists of a retrospective (historical) control period and a prospective (going forward) period. During the prospective period, the ACM will be used to assist the Investigators' decision making and will help the Investigators to administer a personalised intravenous (IV) iron and red blood cell stimulating agent (ESA) therapy, whereas treatment according to standard of care will be documented retrospectively for the same patients during the retrospective period of the trial. Thus, patients can serve as their own control.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Fresenius Medical Care has developed an algorithm that uses a data-driven computational intelligence model based on an artificial neural network architecture (ACM) to generate individualised ESA dose recommendations from a history of dose and response information and specific patient demographic characteristics.

The ACM has been validated and complies with the European requirements for medical devices. The ACM was classified as a Class I medical device in accordance with Directive 93/42/EEC. A proof of concept trial was conducted in 3 NephroCare dialysis clinics (managed by Fresenius) in the Czech Republic, Portugal, and Spain. It could be shown that the introduction of ACM-guided therapy led to a significant decrease in median darbepoetin doses and to a significant increase in on-target haemoglobin (Hb) values along with a decrease in Hb fluctuation. Moreover, a retrospective trial conducted in NephroCare clinics in Portugal, suggested that ACM is able to reliably predict the long-term response to ESA and iron therapy in patients undergoing haemodialysis.

The current trial will test the applicability of the ACM outside of Fresenius clinics in a public hospital setting in the UK. Both intravenous (IV) iron and ESA doses will be recommended by the algorithm. The effectiveness of ACM-guided therapy on several anaemia outcomes will be assessed in adult patients with End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD).This trial will be conducted at 1 main unit and 5 satellite units at King's College Hospital, London, UK, in patients with ESRD who are routinely undergoing haemodialysis.

This trial is designed to assess the effectiveness of the ACM software on anaemia management in routine clinical practice. However, all ultimate decisions on therapeutic or diagnostic procedures, treatments, management of the disease, or resource utilisation will be at the discretion of the Investigator.

The trial will consist of a retrospective control period and a prospective period. During the prospective period, the ACM will be used to facilitate the Investigators' decision making and will help the Investigators to administer a personalised IV iron and ESA therapy, whereas treatment according to standard of care will be documented retrospectively for the same patients during the retrospective period of the trial. Thus, patients can serve as their own control.

The planned overall duration of the trial is 18 months (12 months recruitment period + 6 months until last patient last visit). The planned duration of prospective treatment for an individual patient will be 6 months. The collection of retrospective data from medical records covering a period of 6 months will take place as soon as the Informed Consent Form (ICF) is signed but at the latest at baseline.

Data will be collected at designated time Points (monthly) throughout the Trial once the ICF is signed: at the latest at baseline (collection of retrospective data), at baseline (start of prospective documentation), and for the observation time points (Month 1 to Month 6). However, examinations will follow routine clinical practice at the site according to the Investigator's decision.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

88

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 19 to 90 years
  • On haemodialysis for the past 18 months prior to baseline
  • Treatment with IV iron sucrose during the past 6 months according to the respective Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC)
  • Treatment with epoetin beta during the past 6 months according to the respective SmPC
  • Regular Hb measurements and at least 5 (standard of care, approximately monthly) Hb measurements during the past 6 months
  • Ferritin measurements during the past 6 months (at least 2 measurements)
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Life expectancy <6 months
  • One or more Hb measurements <8 g/dl during the control period
  • Living-donor transplant scheduled within the next 6 months
  • Scheduled for switch to peritoneal dialysis or home haemodialysis
  • Blood transfusion during the past 9 months
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Active infection
  • Current malignancy or haematological disorder
  • Previous severe hypersensitivity reaction to IV iron sucrose
  • Serious allergic reactions to darbepoetin alfa or epoetin alfa/beta/zeta, respectively
  • Current treatment with PEGylated erythropoietin
  • Surgery in the past 6 months
  • Surgery scheduled within the next 6 months
  • Participation in a clinical trial in the past 7 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Anemia Control Model IV iron and ESA

Anemia Control Model (ACM) algorithm to recommend monthly IV and ESA dose over a 6 month period

IV iron: given monthly as required - dosing recommendation by ACM over 6 a month period

Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA): given monthly as required - dosing recommendation by ACM over 6 a month period

The ACM is mainly composed of 2 sub-Systems - predictor model which, depending on the input data, forecasts the response to anaemia drug therapy for a specific patient. The predictor model is implemented as a feed-forward artificial neural network. The ACM is an algorithm that extracts the optimal policy to achieve the established clinical outcome for anaemia management using the predictor model.
IV iron given monthly as required - dose determined by the ACM and as agreed by the investigator
Other Names:
  • Venofer
  • iron sucrose
ESA given monthly as required over 6 months - dose determined by the ACM and as agreed by the investigator
Other Names:
  • epoetin beta

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the proportion of patients with haemoglobin within the target range as compared to the historical control period (non-inferiority testing)
Time Frame: Month -6 to Month -1 compared with Month +1 to Month +6
The proportion of patients with at least 5 (standard of care, approximately monthly) Hb measurements and with 80% of these measurements within the target range of 10 to 12 g/dl from Month -6 to Month -1 will be compared with the proportion of patients with at least 5 measurements and with 80% of these measurements within target range of 10 to 12 g/dl from Month 1 to Month 6 (non-inferiority testing).
Month -6 to Month -1 compared with Month +1 to Month +6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the proportion of patients with haemoglobin within the target range as compared to historical control period (superiority testing)
Time Frame: Month -6 to Month -1 compared with Month +1 to Month +6
The proportion of patients with at least 5 (standard of care, approximately monthly) Hb measurements and with 80% of these measurements within the Hb target range of 10 to 12 g/dl from Month -6 to Month -1 will be compared with the proportion of patients with at least 5 measurements and with 80% of these measurements within target range of 10 to 12 g/dl from Month 1 to Month 6 (superiority testing).
Month -6 to Month -1 compared with Month +1 to Month +6
Change in haemoglobin fluctuations as compared to historical control period
Time Frame: Month -6 to Month -1 compared with Month +1 to Month +6
The Hb fluctuation in patients with at least 5 (standard of care, approximately monthly) Hb measurements from Month -6 to Month -1 and from Month 1 to Month 6 as measured by Hb, Coefficient of Variation (CV), and Standard Deviation (SD) from Month -6 to Month -1 period versus Month 1 to Month 6.
Month -6 to Month -1 compared with Month +1 to Month +6
Change in cumulative ESA dose as compared to historical control period
Time Frame: Month -6 to Month -1 compared with Month +1 to Month +6
Cumulative ESA dose from Month -6 to Month -1 versus cumulative ESA dose from Month 1 to Month 6.
Month -6 to Month -1 compared with Month +1 to Month +6
Change in cumulative IV iron dose as compared to historical control period
Time Frame: Month -6 to Month -1 compared with Month +1 to Month +6
Cumulative IV iron dose from Month -6 to Month -1 versus cumulative IV iron dose from Month +1 to Month +6.
Month -6 to Month -1 compared with Month +1 to Month +6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Iain Macdougall, King's College Hospital NHS Trust

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 21, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 21, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anemia

Clinical Trials on Anemia Control Model (ACM)

3
Subscribe