Effect of Lidocaine With Magnesium Sulfate on the Success of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block

August 8, 2019 updated by: Seyed Amir Mousavi, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Comparison of the Success Rate of Anesthesia Between Lidocaine 2% and Lidocaine 2% Mixed With 10% Magnesium Sulfate in the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Posterior Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis

68 healthy patients pulpitis and requiring root canal therapy are selected. . Sampling was done in a simple and non-experimental way from a dental clinic in Isfahan, and then the samples were randomly assigned to one of the two experimental groups (A, B) using simple random numbers.

Each vial is filled with distilled water or magnesium sulfate by an individual who is unaware of the nature of the design and is not involved in the design, and each letter A or B is written. This statement is not decoded after the statistical examination. Therefore, the study is blind and blind. In this way, 60 patients are examined in 2 groups of 34 First, patients with recognized pulpitis in mandibular posterior teeth have been identified and information about them is given. Patients will be introduced to the executive phase after the required explanation and clarification of the ambiguity and written consent. After completing the patient information form by the practitioner and complying with all entry and exit criteria, the study begins on each patient.

The patient records his pain as an initial pain on the Heath-Parker Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This pain measurement method involves a 180 mm line with descriptive words that differentiates patients on a line where the best describes their pain. In order to design a standard injection of the maxillary nerve block in all patients, using Aspirating Dental Injection Syringe, Novocol Ontario, Canada, the needle of the 27 mm long 35 mm (Septoject, Septodont, Saint-Maur-des- Fosses cedex, France) Lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 80000/1 mixed with magnesium sulfate or distilled water, injections in the retro-cell region and cm1 above the occlusal mandibular plan. After insertion of the needle at a rate of 3-5 mm into the tissue, aspiration was performed and about 2-3 ml / 2. It is injected from the contents of the cartridge, the syringe 1 mm is returned to the bone hard tissue (in the form of the syringe body in the perimmel area of the opposite side), and after the aspiration of the contents of each cartridge in a 1 minute period It is injected. After 15 minutes, in case of numbness of the lips, the patient begins to study and the access cavity begins on the desired tooth. In each of the stages of acquiring the access cavity or entering the initial file to the canal, in the event of pain, the treatment is suspended and the patient signs his pain on the pain assessment chart based on the Heft-parker VAS and at this stage the study It's over. In the absence of anesthetized lips, the patient is excluded from the study and after completing the injection, the root canal is given.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

68 healthy patients (ASA I, II, and over the age of 18 and under the age of 60 years with posterior mandibular maxillary jaw and with symptomatic pulpitis (severe and long response to cold test) and requiring root canal therapy are selected. .

The criteria for entering the study include: absence of periodontal disease and any periapical radiolucency except for PDL dilation, absence of susceptibility to local anesthetic or sulfite drugs, non-pregnant women and non-lactating women, lack of drugs that interact with local anesthetic Or change the perception of pain (such as beta-blocker drugs, opiates, etc.).

Exclusion criteria included: Clinical observation of necrotic pulp after opening the access cavity in the desired tooth, the patient's inability to give informed consent and patient's continuation of the research in each stage of the trial.

Sampling was done in a simple and non-experimental way from a dental clinic in Isfahan, and then the samples were randomly assigned to one of the two experimental groups (A, B) using simple random numbers.

Preparation of infiltration solution will be such that using a syringe with a high accuracy (hamilton) of 0.2 ml of magnesium 10% sulfate vial or distilled water sterilized and then into a 1.8ml cartridge of lidocaine 2% With an epinephrine 80000/1, the solution is shaken 5 times for mixing, so that no sediment should be seen.

Each vial is filled with distilled water or magnesium sulfate by an individual who is unaware of the nature of the design and is not involved in the design, and each letter A or B is written. This statement is not decoded after the statistical examination. Therefore, the study is blind and blind. In this way, 68 patients are examined in 2 groups of 34 people. It should be noted that all anesthesia is injected by one person.

First, patients with recognized pulpitis in mandibular posterior teeth have been identified and information about them is given. Patients will be introduced to the executive phase after the required explanation and clarification of the ambiguity and written consent. After completing the patient information form by the practitioner and complying with all entry and exit criteria, the study begins on each patient.

The patient records his pain as an initial pain on the Heath-Parker Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This pain measurement method involves a 180 mm line with descriptive words that differentiates patients on a line where the best describes their pain. In order to design a standard injection of the maxillary nerve block in all patients, using Aspirating Dental Injection Syringe, Novocol Ontario, Canada, the needle of the 27 mm long 35 mm (Septoject, Septodont, Saint-Maur-des- Fosses cedex, France) Lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 80000/1 mixed with magnesium sulfate or distilled water, injections in the retro-cell region and cm1 above the occlusal mandibular plan. After insertion of the needle at a rate of 3-5 mm into the tissue, aspiration was performed and about 2-3 ml / 2. It is injected from the contents of the cartridge, the syringe 1 mm is returned to the bone hard tissue (in the form of the syringe body in the perimmel area of the opposite side), and after the aspiration of the contents of each cartridge in a 1 minute period It is injected. After 15 minutes, in case of numbness of the lips, the patient begins to study and the access cavity begins on the desired tooth. In each of the stages of acquiring the access cavity or entering the initial file to the canal, in the event of pain, the treatment is suspended and the patient signs his pain on the pain assessment chart based on the Heft-parker VAS and at this stage the study It's over. In the absence of anesthetized lips, the patient is excluded from the study and after completing the injection, the root canal is given.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • absence of periodontal disease
  • absence of susceptibility to local anesthetics or sulfite
  • non-pregnant women and non-lactating women

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical observation of necrotic pulp
  • the patient's inability to give informed consent and patient's continuation of the research in each stage of the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: time of start of anesthesia
EXPERIMENTAL: intensity of anesthesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect of Magnesium with lidocaine
Time Frame: 10 to 20 minute
measuring the time of starting of anesthesia with questionnaire
10 to 20 minute
intensity of pain
Time Frame: 10-20 minute
measuring pain after access cavity preparation with questionnaire
10-20 minute

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 21, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 21, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 21, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 25, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 12, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Local Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on use of magnesium sulfate with lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block

3
Subscribe