Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol for Sedation in Stereotactic Brain Biopsy

March 21, 2022 updated by: Ghada M.Samir, Ain Shams University

Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol on the Onset and Recovery of Sedation in Stereotactic Brain Biopsy A Comparative Study

Pre-operative anxiety leads to higher sympathetic stimulation. Propofol in the main drug used during interventional or imaging techniques that need sedation. Also, dexmedetomidine causes sedation, analgesia, sympatholytic properties, without respiratory depression.In stereotactic brain biopsy; patient discomfort due to drilling a hole through the skull and the advancement of the biopsy needle make the patient in need for good sedation and analgesia.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

Patients with:

  • brain secondaries from the lung/breast/pancreas
  • tuberculoma
  • pyogenic abscess
  • intra-axial supratentorial space occupying lesion with or without hydrocephalus *an average duration of the procedure 1- 2hr 30 min
  • an available caregiver for overnight observation
  • patient relative proximity to the hospital Exclusion criteria

Patients with:

  • morbid obesity (body mass index >35 kg/m2)
  • significant comorbidities (a known history of hepatic disease, renal dysfunction, hypertension, and chronic pain)
  • history of drug or alcohol abuse
  • an allergic reaction to one of the study medications
  • anticipated difficult airway
  • uncontrolled epilepsy
  • poor neurological status
  • neuropsychological unsuitability taking psychotropic drugs (benzodiazepines and barbiturates)
  • patients with brain stem lesions (vital areas of brain)
  • un-cooperative
  • refusing adults
  • patients with ventricular drain
  • already inpatient
  • Intubated patients and those who had a prior craniotomy .

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Hemodynamic parameters
The loading and infusion doses of dexmedetomidine hydrochloride and 1% propofol were calculated according to the patient's body weight and diluted to a 10 ml volume (labeled as loading-1 and loading-2) and a 50 ml volume (labeled as infusion-1 and infusion-2).
Other: Ramsay sedation score
The loading and infusion doses of dexmedetomidine hydrochloride and 1% propofol were calculated according to the patient's body weight and diluted to a 10 ml volume (labeled as loading-1 and loading-2) and a 50 ml volume (labeled as infusion-1 and infusion-2).
Other: Intraoperative side effects
The loading and infusion doses of dexmedetomidine hydrochloride and 1% propofol were calculated according to the patient's body weight and diluted to a 10 ml volume (labeled as loading-1 and loading-2) and a 50 ml volume (labeled as infusion-1 and infusion-2).
Other: recovery of sedation
The loading and infusion doses of dexmedetomidine hydrochloride and 1% propofol were calculated according to the patient's body weight and diluted to a 10 ml volume (labeled as loading-1 and loading-2) and a 50 ml volume (labeled as infusion-1 and infusion-2).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the sedation characteristics
Time Frame: 4 hours
Ramsay sedation score
4 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adverse Effects in the Therapeutic Use of Other and Unspecified Agents Primarily Acting on the Respiratory System

Clinical Trials on dexmedetomidine/ propofol

3
Subscribe