Cardiovascular Rehabilitation - Effectiveness of the Tulppa Program

November 2, 2021 updated by: Rehabilitation Foundation, Finland

Cardiovascular Rehabilitation - Effectiveness of the Tulppa Program - a Controlled Study

This study investigates the effectiveness of a Finnish Tulppa outpatient rehabilitation program. Tulppa is a group-based secondary prevention program for patients with vascular diseases. The program is developed by the Finnish Heart Association. The intervention is implemented at the local primary health care centers in 12 health districts in Finland.

A longitudinal controlled study is used to investigate the effects of the intervention on participants' level of cardiovascular risk factors (e.g. lipids, blood pressure, body mass index), functional capacity (e.g. 6 minute walk test), life style as well as psychosocial factors (e.g. smoking, diet, physical activity, health-related quality of life and depression). The data will be collected at baseline (i.e. before the intervention), and 6 and 12 months after the intervention started.

The participants (n = 300) are patients diagnosed with coronary heart disease. The study group (n = 150) is recruited from participants of Tulppa rehabilitation in three health care districts (Pirkanmaa, South Karelia, Päijät-Häme). The control group (n = 150) is recruited from two health care districts (Turku and Hyvinkää) that do not provide Tulppa rehabilitation.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Malminkartano
      • Helsinki, Malminkartano, Finland, 00410
        • Rehabilitation Foundation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Study group: Patients diagnosed with coronary heart disease taking part in the Tulppa cardiac rehabilitation program at Pirkanmaa, South Karelia and Päijät-Häme health districts
  • Control group: Patients diagnosed with coronary heart disease, living in the area of Turku or Hyvinkää which are health districts that do not provide Tulppa rehabilitation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute and severe mental health problems, alcohol abuse, major limitations in physical activities

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tulppa rehabilitation
8-10 weekly 3-hour group sessions and two follow-up sessions (6 and 12 months).
The intervention includes health education on e.g. healthy diet, weight management, physical activity and psychosocial coping as well as peer discussions and physical exercises.
No Intervention: Control group
Control group does not receive Tulppa rehabilitation during the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health related quality of life
Time Frame: Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Health related quality of life is assessed with the finnish version of RAND-36-Item Health Survey (36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument - SF-36; Aalto, Aro & Teperi, 1999). The RAND-36 is a generic health-related survey consisting of 36 items with eight sub-scales: 1. general health, 2. bodily pain, 3. physical functioning, 4. role limitations/physical, 5. role limitations/emotional, 6. vitality, 7. mental health, and 8. social functioning. The total score is a sum of the eight subscales and the range is 0 - 100. Higher scores on the scale indicate a better quality of life.
Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Modified North Karelia CVD risk score
Time Frame: Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months

The limit values to calculate the CVD risk score were originally developed during the North Karelia project (Puska et al., 2009) and were further elaborated by Ketola (2001). The modified CVD risk score consists of six risk factors:

  1. Body mass index (BMI)
  2. Smoking
  3. Physical inactivity
  4. Systolic blood pressure
  5. Diastolic blood pressure
  6. Total cholesterol. The total score of the index is a sum of the 6 risk factors and the range is 0-16, the cut-off point indicating high risk of CVD is 4.5. Higher scores on the scale indicate a higher risk of cardiovascular disease. Subscore outcomes of the CVD risk score are defined as secondary outcome measures below.
Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The 6-Min Walk Test
Time Frame: Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
The 6-min Walk Test (6MWT) measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes.
Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Blood pressure
Time Frame: Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Blood pressure is expressed in terms of the systolic and diastolic pressure and is measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg).
Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Waist circumference
Time Frame: Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Waist circumference is measured halfway between the costal margin and iliac crest in centimeters.
Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Body mass index
Time Frame: Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
The body mass index (BMI) is calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m2).
Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Lipid profile
Time Frame: Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Triglycerides, LDL-, HDL- and total cholesterol level will be measured with laboratory test
Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Blood glucose level
Time Frame: Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/l) will be measured with laboratory test
Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Physical inactivity
Time Frame: Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Physical inactivity is assessed with one question about the frequency per week of physical exercise causing swetting and /or some shortness of breath (1 = 3 or more times/week, 2 = 1-2 times/week, 3 = 1 time/week, 4 = sometimes, 5 = never)
Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Smoking
Time Frame: Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Smoking is evaluated with one question about number of cigarettes/day (0 = not at all...8 = 30 or more cigarettes/day)
Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Alcohol use
Time Frame: Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Alcohol use is measured with two questions:

  1. How often do you have drinks containing alcohol? (0 = never, 1 = monthly or less, 2 = 2-4 times a month, 3 = 2-3 times a week, 4 = 4 times a week or more)
  2. How many drinks containing alcohol do you have on a typical day when you are drinking? (1 = 1-2 drinks, 2 = 3-4, 3 = 5-6, 4 = 7-9, 5 = 10 drinks or more)
Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Dietary habits
Time Frame: Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Dietary habits are evaluated with 3 questions:

Do you eat regular meals? (2 = yes, 1 = I don´t know, 0 = no) Do you use low-fat foods? (2 = yes, 1 = I don´t know, 0 = no) Do you eat enough good / healthy fat? (2 = yes, 1 = I don´t know, 0 = no)

Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Depression
Time Frame: Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Depression will be measured using The finnish Depression Scale DEPS (Salokangas, R. K., Poutanen, O & Stengard, E.,1995). 10 items, the items are rated from 0 to 3 (0 = not at all... ...3 = very much) and the range of the total score is 0-30. Higher scores on the scale indicate a higher probability of depression.
Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Anxiety
Time Frame: Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Anxiety will be assessed with the state-anxiety sub-scale of the Endler Multidimensional Anxiety Scales (EMAS-State) (Endler, N. S., Parker, J. D. A., Bagby, R. M., & Cox, B. J., 1991). The State-anxiety sub-scale consists of 20 items evaluated on a five-point Likert scale (score range 20-100). EMAS-State assesses two components of state-anxiety : a cognitive worry component and an autonomic-emotional component. Both components consist of ten items. In this study the 10 items of a cognitive worry component is used. Higher scores indicate a higher level of cognitive worry.
Changes between baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Family support
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and twelve months
Partner support will be measured with a Finnish 12-item Family Support (FS) scale (Julkunen & Greenglass, 1989; Gustavsson-Lilius M., Julkunen J., & Hietanen P., 2007). The items are rated using a five-step Likert scale (1 = completely disagree… 5 = completely agree) and the range of the total score is 12 - 60. The sum-score of the scale reflects the respondents' perceived degree of emotional and instrumental support received from other family members. Higher scores on the scale indicates higher amount of perceived support from the family.
Baseline, 6 months and twelve months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Erja Poutianen, PhD, Rehabilitation Foundation
  • Principal Investigator: Mila Gustavsson-Lilius, PhD, Rehabilitation Foundation
  • Principal Investigator: Piia Pietilä, MA, Rehabilitation Foundation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 19, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 14, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Heart Disease

Clinical Trials on Tulppa rehabilitation

3
Subscribe