Blinding and Previous Experiences of Dry Needling

December 10, 2020 updated by: Gracia Gallego Sendarrubias, European University of Madrid

Blinding of Dry Needling Technique Based on Previous Experiences: A Double-blinded Clinical Trial

Dry needling (DN) is a treatment technique widely used in patients with various musculoskeletal health problems due to myofascial trigger points (MTrP). DN has shown to have positive effect on pain and function in patients with mechanical neck pain. These positive results are thought to be the consequence of specific neurophysiological and mechanical processes. Research has shown that DN induces 1) end plate inhibition, 2) reduction of inflammatory substances, 3) increase of blood flow and oxygen and 4) a reduction of nociceptive afferent activity. However, the exact working mechanisms underlying DN effects is still a topic of debate. This trial addresses one of the major methodological issues in needle testing,the effects of proper blinding. DN is a specific technique that is not easily be replaced by another comparable intervention. A sham needle with a blunt tip was created that simulates penetration into the skin without actually doing so. Research about a valid method for the control in needling studies is for this reason of particular relevance. A proper blinding technique is of importance to further the field of DN.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The objectives of this study are to analysize short-term effects on pain intensity and pressure pain sensitivity according to previous experience (blinding) in subjects with mechanical neck pain receiving real or sham-DN and to determine the success in masking DN versus sham DN in patients with mechanical neck pain based on prior experience with this technique.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rest Of The World
      • Madrid, Rest Of The World, Spain, 28922
        • Gracia Gallego-Sendarrubias

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Non-specific mechanical neck pain of at least 3 months of duration
  • Between 18-60 years old
  • At least one active trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle which referred pain reproduces the neck pain symptoms

Exclusion Criteria:

  • whiplash injury;
  • previous cervical or thoracic surgery;
  • cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy;
  • diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome;
  • having undergone physical therapy in the previous 6 months;
  • fear to needles

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: DN group
The intervention group will receive real dry needling (DN) (fast in and fast out needling technique) in an active MTrP within upper trapezius muscle.
Real dry needling will be conducted according to Hong description, fast-in and fast-out interventions. The intervention will be applied until a total of four local twitch responses will be elicited
Placebo Comparator: Placebo needle
The placebo group will receive sham needling in an active MTrP within the upper trapezius muscle. A sham needle will be used as placebo. This needle has a blunt tip and retractable handle that created the illusion of a needle penetrating the skin.
Sham dry needling with be conducted with a sham needle (Steitberger's Park sham device (PSD). This needle has a blunt tip and retractable handle that created the illusion of a needle penetrating the skin. When this needle touches the skin, a pricking sensation will be created. However, when pressure will be increased, the shaft of the needle disappears into the handle creating a sensation on the patient.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Neck Pain Intensity between baseline and follow-up periods
Time Frame: Baseline, inmediately after and 1 week after intervention
The intensity of neck pain at rest and during active movement of the cervical spine in rotation will be assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS).
Baseline, inmediately after and 1 week after intervention
Identification (blinding) of the needling intervention
Time Frame: Inmediately after intervention
Participants will be asked directly after the intervention whether they thought they had received a real intervention or a sham. Answering categories were: 'yes' (real DN) or 'no' (sham DN).
Inmediately after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Pressure pain sensitivity between baseline and follow-up periods
Time Frame: Baseline, inmediately after and 1 week after intervention
Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) will be assessed at the upper trapezius muscle, spinous process of C7 and distant pain-free area of the lower extremity (heel)
Baseline, inmediately after and 1 week after intervention
Changes in patients self-perceived improvement between baseline and follow-up periods
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 week after intervention

Patients self-perceived improvement will be assessed using a Global Rating of Change (GROC) consisting of a 15-point scale ranging from -7 (a very great deal worse) to +7 (a very great deal better).

Descriptors of worsening or improving are assigned with values ranging from -1 to -7 and +1 to +7, respectively

Baseline and 1 week after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 4, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 2, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Hulp:5006

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Dry needling

3
Subscribe