Post-operative Pain Control of Testicular Sperm Extraction Using Liposomal Bupivacaine

November 23, 2020 updated by: Weill Medical College of Cornell University
The study is a drug trial comparing the post-operative pain control provided by liposomal bupivacaine (a local anesthetic) against standard bupivacaine (a different formulation of the local anesthetic) for men undergoing testicular sperm extraction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Weill Cornell Medicine Department of Urology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men scheduled for surgical sperm retrieval for infertility
  • Men 18 years and older who can provide informed consent
  • No documented allergy to bupivacaine or celecoxib

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior history of substance abuse
  • Any narcotic use within the last 3 months
  • Concomitant use of aspirin
  • Any of the following comorbidities: renal failure, heart disease, peptic ulcer disease, cerebrovascular disease, significant liver disease, untreated depression, chronic pain disorder, or bleeding diatheses
  • Medical history or concurrent illness that the investigator considers sufficiently serious to interfere with the conduct, completion, or results of this trial, or constitutes an unacceptable risk to the subject

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Liposomal Bupivacaine
Participants in this arm will have a single injection of liposomal bupivacaine admixed with standard bupivacaine (266mg liposomal bupivacaine mixed with 50mg bupivacaine hydrochloride) at the conclusion of their surgical sperm retrieval procedure.
After surgical sperm retrieval, the wound will be injected with liposomal bupivacaine (266 mg) mixed with standard bupivacaine (bupivacaine hydrochloride 50mg) for post-operative pain relief.
Active Comparator: Standard Bupivacaine
Participants in this arm will have a single injection of standard bupivacaine (100mg bupivacaine hydrochloride) at the conclusion of their surgical sperm retrieval procedure.
After surgical sperm retrieval, the wound will be injected only with standard bupivacaine (bupivacaine hydrochloride 100mg) for post-operative pain relief.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Scores 48 Hours After Surgery
Time Frame: First 48 hours after surgery

Every 8 hours in the first 48 hours post-surgery, subjects were prompted to report their pain score on the 11-point numerical pain rating scale, NRS-11 (Numerical Rating Scale, 11 points). 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst possible pain.

Each subject's pain scores were then plotted against time, and the area under the curve was then computed. The minimum composite score would be 0 (no pain ever reported), and the maximum composite score would be 480 (maximum pain (score of 10) reported each time across 48 hours).

First 48 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Scores 60 Hours After Surgery
Time Frame: First 60 hours after surgery

Every 12 hours in the first 60 hours post-surgery, subjects were prompted to report their pain score on the 11-point numerical pain rating scale, NRS-11 (Numerical Rating Scale, 11 points). 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst possible pain.

Each subject's pain scores were then plotted against time, and the area under the curve was then computed. The minimum composite score would be 0 (no pain ever reported), and the maximum composite score would be 600 (maximum pain (score of 10) reported each time across 60 hours).

First 60 hours after surgery
Pain Scores 7 Days After Surgery
Time Frame: First 7 days after surgery

Every 12 hours in the first 7 days post-surgery, subjects were prompted to report their pain score on the 11-point numerical pain rating scale, NRS-11 (Numerical Rating Scale, 11 points). 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst possible pain.

Each subject's pain scores were then plotted against time, and the area under the curve was then computed. The minimum composite score would be 0 (no pain ever reported), and the maximum composite score would be 1680 (maximum pain (score of 10) reported each time across 168 hours).

First 7 days after surgery
Narcotic Requirement
Time Frame: First 7 days after surgery
Total number of narcotic tablets required between the intervention and control arms during post-operative day 1 through 7.
First 7 days after surgery
Time to Narcotic Rescue
Time Frame: First 7 days after surgery
Time (in hours) to first rescue narcotic utilization between the two arms.
First 7 days after surgery
Pain Control Satisfaction
Time Frame: 7th day after surgery
Overall satisfaction of pain control regimen self reported on post-operative day 7. The prompt required a yes/no answer. The percent of participants answering "yes" will be compared between the two arms.
7th day after surgery
Percentage of Patients Not Requiring Any Narcotics
Time Frame: 7th day after surgery
The percentage of patients remaining opiate free by post-operative day 7.
7th day after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Russell Hayden, MD, Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 4, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 14, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Male Infertility

Clinical Trials on Liposomal Bupivacaine

3
Subscribe