Effect of Physical Exercise on Tumor Proliferation of Luminal B Breast Cancer Patients (EFIK)

January 12, 2023 updated by: Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group

Effect of Physical Exercise on Ki-67 Levels in Women With Operable Breast Cancer Hormonal Receptor Positive, HER2 Negative

Observational study to evaluate the effect of physical exercise prior to surgery and adjuvant systemic treatment in women with newly diagnosed operable hormone receptor(HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancers

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Effect of exercise on tumor aggressiveness and the impact on patients' quality of life.

Exercise is a safe and effective treatment for women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC), that has an integral benefit during and after treatments, however, the effect at the tumour microenvironment it is unknown; previous studies have evaluated the association between exercise and BC, finding a positive influence on it, which suggest that exercise could reduce the aggressiveness of the tumour. This study will explore the exercise impact in tumor microenvironment, as part of the therapy given to the patients prior to surgery and treatment. In addition, different serum biomarkers involved and the tailoring of exercise for these women will be evaluated. The effect of exercise on treatments secondary effects, biomarkers and quality of life will be evaluated after 6 months of BC surgery. This project will open a window of opportunity to explore new translational research as well as new treatment vias to the patients of this breast cancer subgroup.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28007
        • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Women with newly diagnosed operable hormone receptor(HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancers

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed, previously untreated clinical stage I-IIIA without previous treatment.
  • ER positive breast cancer according to local results. (RH+ is defined as ≥ 1% assessed by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) to Estrogen Receptor (ER) and/or Progesterone Receptor (P)E).
  • HER2 negative in the primary tumour according to local results. (HER2 confirmation should be done following the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) 2013 guidelines)
  • Scheduled to undergo surgical resection.
  • Ki67 levels must be over 13%, according to local results.
  • At least 14 days from enrolment to planned surgical resection.
  • Karnofsky performance status of at least 70% at study entry or 0-1 level in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Scale.
  • Signed consent prior to initiation of study-related procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Schedule to receive any form of induction/neoadjuvant therapy
  • Significant cardiac disease (ventricular ejection fraction of <50%, unstable angina, placement of cardiac stents and myocardial infarction within precious 6 months)
  • Any pulmonary dysfunction which may affect to the exercise program perform.
  • Any mental disease or condition that compromise the physical, psychological and emotional patients' wellness or affect to the process.
  • Contraindications to a cardiopulmonary exercise test as recommended by the American Thoracic Society.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
High intensity physical exercise
Supervised Exercise Group: Customized and supervised exercise high intensity training program during 2-3 weeks previous surgery.
Exercise intervention adapted to maximum rate of oxygen consumption measured during incremental exercise (VO2level) of each patient, working between 60% to 100% VO2level. The activity will be walk-run in a treadmill. 10 sessions minimum
Control
Supervised Stretching Group: a stretching and body balance classes will be developed to control the possible confounders and to control the exercise level of participants.
Stretching and relaxing exercise during 30 minutes. Same number of sessions as intervention group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tumor proliferation (Ki67)
Time Frame: Post-surgery, an average of 6 months
Tumor proliferation (Ki67) will be assessed immunohistochemically at basal biopsies versus post-surgery tumor samples.
Post-surgery, an average of 6 months
Proliferation Score
Time Frame: Post-surgery, an average of 6 months
A 50-gene quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay (PAM50) will be used to identify the intrinsic biological subtypes using RNA isolated from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue from baseline biopsies samples and post-surgery tumor samples.
Post-surgery, an average of 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline molecular subtypes
Time Frame: Post-surgery, an average of 6 months
A 50-gene qPCR assay (PAM50) will be used to identify the intrinsic biological subtypes using RNA isolated from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue from baseline biopsies samples and post-surgery tumor samples.
Post-surgery, an average of 6 months
Changes in tumor microenvironment: levels of Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)
Time Frame: Post-surgery, an average of 6 months
VEGF will be evaluated on tissue from baseline biopsies samples and post-surgery tumor samples by Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Post-surgery, an average of 6 months
Changes in tumor microenvironment: levels of factor Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1)
Time Frame: Post-surgery, an average of 6 months
HIF-1 will be evaluated on tissue from baseline biopsies samples and post-surgery tumor samples by Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Post-surgery, an average of 6 months
Change in tumor microenvironment: levels of cleaved caspase 3
Time Frame: Post-surgery, an average of 6 months
Levels of cleaved caspase 3 will be evaluated on tissue from baseline biopsies samples and post-surgery tumor samples by Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Post-surgery, an average of 6 months
Oxygen uptake during peak exercise (VO2peak)
Time Frame: Post-surgery, an average of 6 months
VO2peak will be obtained of the Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) performed at baseline and after the exercise program until surgery.
Post-surgery, an average of 6 months
Change in body composition
Time Frame: Post-surgery, an average of 6 months
Change in body composition will be assessed by bioimpedance parameters. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a commonly used method for estimating body composition, and in particular body fat, and will be performed at baseline and after the exercise program until surgery.
Post-surgery, an average of 6 months
Change in fatigue levels
Time Frame: Post-surgery, an average of 6 months
Change in fatigue levels will be assessed by questionnaire Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: Fatigue (FACT-F). The physical well-being domain has 7 items with scores from 0 to 28 points; social/family well-being, 7 items with score from 0 to 28 points; emotional well-being, 6 items with score from 0 to 24 points; functional well-being, 7 items with score from 0 to 28 points; and fatigue subscale, 13 items with score from 0 to 52. Each item has five likert-type options graduated from 0 to 4: "Not at all", "A little bit"; Somewhat"; "Quite a bit"; "Very much'. The final score of FACT-F is obtained by adding the scores of the five domains, and may vary from 0 to 160 points. The higher the number of points, the better the quality of life and the less the fatigue of the patients is. To obtain the score, the negative questions are reverted; then the answers of the domains are added up, and a proportional average is carried out in case of non answered items.
Post-surgery, an average of 6 months
Change in quality of life levels
Time Frame: Post-surgery, an average of 6 months
Change in quality of life levels will be assessed by questionnaire Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: Breast Cancer (FACT-B). The FACT-B is a breast cancer-specific HRQoL instrument of the FACIT system. The 37-item are divided into five subscales, namely physical (PWB), social/family (SWB), emotional (EWB), functional well-beings (FWB), and the additional concerns for breast cancer (BCS). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Negatively worded items were recoded such that a higher score indicates a better HRQoL. The FACT-B total score is the sum of scores of all five subscales.
Post-surgery, an average of 6 months
Change in depression levels
Time Frame: Post-surgery, an average of 6 months
Change in depression levels will be assessed by questionnaire Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). The CES-D is a 20-item measure assessing symptoms of depression with items phrased as self-statements (e.g., "I felt hopeful about the future"). Respondents rate how frequently each item applied to them over the course of the past week. Ratings were based on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (rarely or none of the time [less than 1 day]) to 3 (most or all of the time [5-7 days]).
Post-surgery, an average of 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 8, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 8, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GEICAM/2014-09

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Exercise

3
Subscribe