Effect of Quadratus Lumborum Block on Perioperative Analgesia and Inflammatory Responses in Laparoscopic Nephrectomy

July 9, 2019 updated by: Dita Aditianingsih, Indonesia University

Effect of Preincisional Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Block on Perioperative Analgesia and Inflammatory Responses in Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: A Single-Blinded, Randomised Control Trial

Quadratus lumborum (QL) block can reduce intraoperative opioid consumption, decrease inflammation responses of IL-6, and reduce acute pain intensity in comparison with non-receiving QL block as the control group.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Quadratus lumborum block had been studied as an effective postoperative analgesia in lower abdominal surgery, due to its spread to the thoracic paravertebral space and thoracolumbar fascia nerve. The effect of preincisional ultrasound (US)-guided QL block as "preemptive analgesia" on patient underwent laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy has never been evaluated. As preemptive analgesia, quadratus lumborum block could provide analgesics before and after surgery. Both groups immediately received basic postoperative analgesia regimen paracetamol 1 gr IV 8th hourly.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • DKI Jakarta
      • Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia, 10430
        • Rumah Sakit Cipto Mangunkusumo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • BMI < 30 kg/m2
  • ASA 1 or 2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refused to participate
  • chronic use of analgesics or anti-inflammatory drugs
  • allergy to local anaesthetic
  • duration of surgery <4 or > 6 hours
  • duration of anaesthesia <5 or > 7 hours
  • neuropathy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Non-QL block
The control (non-QL block) group only received fentanyl IV during surgery.
Only received fentanyl IV during surgery.
Experimental: Bilateral QL block
The patients were in the semi-lateral supine position to show up the side to be blocked. Using USG and 1-6 MHz convex transducer placed in the transverse plane above the iliac crest at the level of the umbilicus. A Stimuplex® 20G 100-mm needle was advanced in anteroposterior direction toward the junction of tapered abdominal muscle layer and QL muscle, and 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was deposited in the anterolateral border of QL muscle at the junction with the transversalis fascia reach outside the anterior layer of transversalis fascia. The lateral approach QL (type I) blocks were performed at both sides of patients. The total amount of bupivacaine was 100 mg for each patient
Bilateral lateral Quadratus Lumborum block using 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine each injection as preemptive analgesia.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraoperative fentanyl consumption
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Intraoperative fentanyl consumption was recorded as total consumption in µg, and calculated into mean consumption per hour in µg.kg-1.h-1, due to the influence of patients body weight and duration of surgery to the given dose of fentanyl boluses.
Intraoperative
Changes in Interleukin-6 from baseline
Time Frame: 24 hours
Measurement of plasma Interleukin-6 before the anaesthesia induction as the baseline; 2 hours of surgical stimulation and gas insufflation intraoperatively; and 2 hours after recovery from anaesthesia.
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numerical Rating Scale
Time Frame: 24 hours
Pain measurement using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at rest and during movement. NRS from 0 =no pain to 10= worst pain at 2 hours and 24 hours after anaesthesia recovery
24 hours
Hemodynamic Profiles: Heart Rate in bpm
Time Frame: Intraoperative
The trends of perioperative haemodynamic profiles during and after surgery: heart rate in beat per minute
Intraoperative
Hemodynamic Profiles: Systolic, Diastolic, and Mean Arterial Pressure in mmHg
Time Frame: Intraoperative
The trends of perioperative haemodynamic profiles during and after surgery : systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure in mmHg
Intraoperative
Number of participants with additional intravenous tramadol
Time Frame: 24 hours
During observation after surgery, when the NRS began to increase > 3 at rest the intermittent tramadol 50 mg IV boluses was given 8th hourly. If the NRS still remained > 3, the intermittent tramadol 50 mg IV boluses were administered more frequently up to 4th hourly.
24 hours
Number of participants with additional intravenous fentanyl
Time Frame: 24 hours
If the pain relief was still inadequate after increasing tramadol boluses, the extra fentanyl 1 µg.kg^-1 IV boluses was given at every 15-30th minute until the NRS ≤ 3.
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 18, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 13, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 17, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Non-QL block

3
Subscribe