Optimizing Anesthesia for Post Partum Tubal Ligations

December 16, 2021 updated by: Mark Powell, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Comparing 1% Spinal Chloroprocaine to Low-dose Bupivacaine Using the Epidural Volume Extension Technique for Post-Partum Tubal Ligation

In this study, the investigators will compare CLOROTEKAL® (1% spinal chloroprocaine) to low-dose isobaric bupivacaine using the epidural volume extension (EVE) technique in patients undergoing post-partum tubal ligation (PPBTL). This will be a randomized, double-blinded study. Patients scheduled for PPBTL at the Women and Infants Center (WIC) will be eligible for enrollment in this study. Outcomes measured will include: ability to achieve an adequate level required for surgery (T6), rate of epidural activation, and duration of the block. The investigators hope to determine the usefulness of each drug using the EVE technique in the setting of PPBTL.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35223
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient scheduled for a postpartum tubal ligation at the Women and Infants Center will be eligible for the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age less than 18 years old
  • allergy to either local anesthetic class (amide or ester)
  • contraindication to spinal anesthesia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Bupivacaine
1 ml 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine (5 mg) + 15 mcg fentanyl intrathecal plus epidural volume extension (EVE)
1 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine with 15 mcg fentanyl 10 cc of sterile saline in the epidural
EXPERIMENTAL: Chloroprocaine
5 ml 1% spinal chloroprocaine (50 mg) intrathecal plus epidural volume extension (EVE)
Adding 5 cc 1% Chloroprocaine with 10 cc sterile saline in the epidural

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients Who Achieve a Level of Numbness of T6 or Higher
Time Frame: 10 minutes after spinal injection

Degree of analgesia is determined by the level of the block. Block level may be T1 (highest level of numbness), T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7,T8, T9 , T10, T11, T12, L1, L2, L3, or L4 (lowest level or numbness).

A level of numbness of T6 or higher is required for an adequate surgical block. Participants are classified as having either an adequate level of numbness (T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, or T6) or an inadequate level (T7,T8, T9 , T10, T11, T12, L1, L2, L3, or L4).

10 minutes after spinal injection
Level of Numbness
Time Frame: 10 minutes after spinal injection

The degree to which participants experience analgesia. Degree of analgesia is determined by the level of the block. Block level may be T1 (highest level of numbness), T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7,T8, T9 , T10, T11, T12, L1, L2, L3, or L4 (lowest level or numbness).

Participants are assigned a numerical score according to level of the block. Numerical scores were assigned so that a higher score indicates better outcome (i.e., greater level of numbness):

T1 = 16 points; T2 = 15 points; T3 = 14 points; T4 = 13 points; T5 = 12 points; T6 = 11 points; T7 = 10 points; T8 = 9 points; T9 = 8 points; T10 = 7 points; T11 = 6 points; T12 = 5 points; L1 = 4 points; L2 = 3 points; L3 = 2 points; L4 = 1 point

10 minutes after spinal injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Epidural Activation
Time Frame: Day of surgery
Number of patients who required epidural activation
Day of surgery
Supplemental Intravenous Sedation or General Anesthesia
Time Frame: Day of surgery
Number of patients who required supplemental intravenous sedation or general anesthesia
Day of surgery
Modified Bromage Score at 10 Minutes Post-injection
Time Frame: 10 minutes after spinal injection

The modified Bromage score is an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4 with higher values indicating greater levels of numbness.

0 = ability to maintain leg lift for prolonged period; 1 = ability to lift legs briefly; 2 = ability to bend knees; 3 = ability to wiggle toes; 4 = no movement of lower extremities

10 minutes after spinal injection
Modified Bromage Score 60 Minutes After Intrathecal Injection
Time Frame: 60 minutes after spinal injection

The modified Bromage score is an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4 with higher values indicating greater levels of numbness.

0 = ability to maintain leg lift for prolonged period; 1 = ability to lift legs briefly; 2 = ability to bend knees; 3 = ability to wiggle toes; 4 = no movement of lower extremities

60 minutes after spinal injection
Time to PACU Discharge
Time Frame: Day of surgery
Time required for readiness for discharge from Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
Day of surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 13, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 3, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 3, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 17, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnancy Related

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine

3
Subscribe