Pilot Study Person-centred Tablet Intervention

July 18, 2019 updated by: Saxion University of Applied Sciences

Randomised Controlled Feasibility Study Into FindMyApps; First Evaluation of a Tablet Intervention to Promote Self-management and Meaningful Activities in People With Mild Dementia

First evaluation of FindMyApps, a tablet intervention consisting of a selection tool for usable apps for self-management and meaningful activities and a training that supports informal carers to help people with dementia to learn how to use the tablet and the tool.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Testing the feasibility and mechanism of impact of FindMyApps, a tablet intervention consisting of a selection tool to help persons with dementia find usable apps for self-management and meaningful activities and a training that supports informal carers to employ errorless learning principles to help people with dementia to learn how to use the tablet and the tool.

An exploratory pilot randomized controlled trial was carried out with a mixed-methods design. Twenty persons with mild dementia and carer dyads were randomly assigned to the FindMyApps group (n = 10) that used the FindMyApps training and selection tool, or a control condition that just got a tablet (n = 10). After informal carers had received the training, the dyads in the experimental group started with the three-month intervention. Pre and post-test measurements consisted of questionnaires and post-test semi-structured interviews.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Overijssel
      • Enschede, Overijssel, Netherlands, 7500 KB
        • Saxion University of applied Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eligible dyads had to be community dwelling.
  • Persons with dementia had Mild Cognitive Impairment or mild dementia with a score of 3 to 4 on the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS; 45), with or without a confirmed diagnosis.
  • Availability of an informal carer or volunteer to provide support.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in another intervention trial
  • Severe visual and/or physical impairment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: FMA group
Receiving the FMA training and tool
A person-centred, tailored tablet intervention, called FindMyApps (FMA). The intervention consists of the FMA training to use the tablet and the FMA selection tool to help users find apps for self-management and meaningful activities that fit their needs, wishes and abilities
Placebo Comparator: control group
Receiving a simple tablet training and some websites
Receiving an introductory tablet training and some links to websites that recommend usable apps for people with dementia in general

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-management abilities people with dementia
Time Frame: At baseline and post-intervention at 3 months follow up
Measured with the revised 30-item Self-Management Ability Scale (SMAS-30). Change/ difference between baseline and post-intervention. It consists of six subscales: Taking Initiative, Self-efficacy, Investing, Positive Perspective, Multifunctionality, and Variety. Each subscale consists of five items scored on a 5-point or 6-point Likert-type scale. A 5-point scale is used for 'Self-efficacy' (1 = I certainly do not think so, 5 = I certainly think so) and 'Positive Perspective' (1 = No!, 5 = Yes!), and a 6-point scale is used for 'Taking Initiative', 'Investing', and 'Multifunctionality' (1 = never, 6 = very often), and 'Variety' (1 = none, 6 = more than six). Item scores are transformed into scores ranging from 0 to 20. Mean subscale scores range from 0 to 100, as does the total score, which is the mean score of the six subscales. A higher score indicates more self-management abilities.
At baseline and post-intervention at 3 months follow up
Participation in daily and social activities people with dementia
Time Frame: At baseline and post-intervention at 3 months follow up
Measured with a short version of the Pleasant Activities List (PAL). Change/ difference between baseline and post-intervention. The PAL was used to assess the frequency and enjoyability of daily and social activities. In this study, the PAL was shortened from its original 139 item to 31 items divided into two subscales: Social Activities (SA), such as visiting family, and Domestic Activities (DA), such as gardening. Shortening was done for two reasons: the length of the original version was thought to be not feasible for the PwDs and a focus on social and domestic activities was more in line with this study. Items relate to the frequency of engagement and the subjective enjoyability, which are scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much). A higher score indicates that activities are done more often and enjoyed more.
At baseline and post-intervention at 3 months follow up
Participation in daily and social activities people with dementia
Time Frame: At baseline and post-intervention at 3 months follow up
Measured with one item of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT). Change/ difference between baseline and post-intervention. Responses on this item are given on a scale ranging from 1 ('I have as much social contact as I want with people I like') to 4 ('I have little social contact with people and feel socially isolated'). A higher score indicates less social participation.
At baseline and post-intervention at 3 months follow up
Feeling of competence informal carers
Time Frame: At baseline and post-intervention at 3 months follow up
Measured with the Short Sense of Competence Scale (SSCQ). Change/ difference between baseline and post-intervention.The SSCQ contains of seven statements. Informal caregivers had answered these questions on a 5-point-likert scale which ranges from 'agree very strongly' to 'disagree very strongly'. For feeling of competence, the scores on all items were summed to get a sum-score. The sum-score ranges between 7 and 35 and a higher score indicates a greater feeling of competence.
At baseline and post-intervention at 3 months follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived self-efficacy people with dementia
Time Frame: At baseline and post-intervention at 3 months follow up
Measured with the Dutch version of the 10-item General Self-Efficacy Scale (D-GSE scale). Change/ difference between baseline and post-intervention. Responses are structured on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all true) to 4 (exactly true). A total score ranging between 10 and 40 is obtained by summing the responses on all ten items; a higher score indicates more self-efficacy.
At baseline and post-intervention at 3 months follow up
Perceived autonomy people with dementia
Time Frame: At baseline and post-intervention at 3 months follow up
Measured with the 12-item Experienced Autonomy List (EAL). Change/ difference between baseline and post-intervention. Responses are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (totally disagree) to 5 (totally agree). Responses to negatively worded items are reverse-coded. The scores on all items were summed to get a sum-score. The sum-score ranges between 12 and 60. A higher score indicates more perceived autonomy.
At baseline and post-intervention at 3 months follow up
Quality of life people with dementia
Time Frame: At baseline and post-intervention at 3 months follow up
Measured with the Dementia Quality of Life scale (DQoL). Change/ difference between baseline and post-intervention. It consists of 29 items that are focused on five domains: self-esteem, positive affect, negative affect, feelings of belonging, and sense of aesthetics. All items are rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Responses on 'sense of aesthetics' relate to enjoyment and range from 1 (not at all) to 5 (a lot). Responses on the four other subscales relate to frequency and range from 1 (never) to 5 (very often). Scores for the subscales are calculated by computing the mean score. In addition, the DQoL contains one global item to assess overall quality of life on a scale from 1 (bad) to 5 (excellent). A higher score on both the subscales and the global item indicates a higher quality of life.
At baseline and post-intervention at 3 months follow up
Positive care experiences informal carers
Time Frame: At baseline and post-intervention at 3 months follow up
Measured with the Positive Experience Scale (PES). Change/ difference between baseline and post-intervention. The PES is an 8-item scale. The answer categories were: (1) agree , not agree/not disagree and disagree, whereby not agree/not disagree are took together as (0) disagree. The scores on all items were summed to get a sum-score. The sum-score ranges between 0 and 8, whereby a higher score indicates more positive care experiences.
At baseline and post-intervention at 3 months follow up
Quality of life informal carers
Time Frame: At baseline and post-intervention at 3 months follow up
Measured with the EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels scale (EQ-5D-5L). Change/ difference between baseline and post-intervention. The EQ-5D-5L consists of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Informal caregivers had the following answer options on these dimensions: (1) no problems, (2) slight problems, (3) moderate problems, (4) severe problems or (5) extreme problems. A mean sum-score was calculated on these dimensions which ranges from 1 till 5, whereby a higher score indicates more problems. Besides that, the EQ-5D-5L consists of the EuroQol Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS), which contains of a 20 centimeter vertical scale ranging from 0 till 100. Informal caregivers rated their health on this scale, whereby a higher score indicates a better health.
At baseline and post-intervention at 3 months follow up
Quality of life informal carers
Time Frame: At baseline and post-intervention at 3 months follow up
Measured with The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum DataSet (TOPICS-MDS). Change/ difference between baseline and post-intervention. In the quality of life topic of TOPICS-MDS informal caregivers were asked to rate their current quality of life on a five-level response scale which ranges from 1 (excellent) till 5 (poor). Besides that, informal carers rated their quality of life in comparison with the previous year on a five-level response scale which ranges from to 1 (much better) till 5 (much worse), whereby a lower score indicates a better quality of life. The last question which informal caregivers answered was about their perceived quality of life. Informal carers answered this question by rating their present life on a scale of 0 till 10, whereby a higher score indicates a better life.
At baseline and post-intervention at 3 months follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yvonne Kerkhof, MSc, Saxion University of applied Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 31, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 12, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

March 22, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neurological Rehabilitation

Clinical Trials on FMA group

3
Subscribe