Patient Satisfaction Survey of Non-surgical Urinary Incontinence Treatment

October 5, 2020 updated by: Erin Duecy, University of Rochester

Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Non-Surgical Management of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

The purpose of this study is to identify self-reported wellness following nonsurgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. This will be done by correlating the response of "yes" on the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) question to responses from other questionnaires regarding urinary symptoms.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

125

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14623
        • University Urogynecology Associates

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Eligible subjects will be women over the age of 18 who desire nonsurgical management of stress urinary incontinence.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult women (> 18 years) seeking care for stress urinary incontinence at the URMC in Rochester, NY, DUMC in Durham, NC, Western New York (WNY) Urology Associates in Cheektowaga, NY, or at the UTMB in Galveston, TX.
  • English-speaking
  • Possess the ability to complete electronic patient reported outcome questionnaires and voiding diaries

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who decline to participate in the study
  • Women were unable to complete electronic patient reported outcome questionnaires
  • Women with greater than stage II uterovaginal prolapse or post-hysterectomy prolapse.
  • Women considered citizens of the European Union (EU), including EU citizens living in the United States.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
PASS Cohort
The Severity Index for Urinary Incontinence, which documents incontinence frequency and severity, pelvic floor distress, patient global impression of severity and improvement, physical function, depression, sleep disturbance, anxiety, global health and ability to participate in social roles and activities.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of participants whose Urinary Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6) score predict their Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) answer
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Each participant will be asked to complete the Urinary Distress Inventory 6 (UDI-6) after enrollment and again after 6 weeks. This is a short validated disease-specific patient reported outcome measuring urinary incontinence severity. The UDI-6 is a likert scale based questionnaire that calculates the mean of the scores and multiplies that mean by 25 to scale the instrument to an "actual score" with a range of 0 - 100. The higher the score the greater perceived negative impact on an individual's quality of life. The question "Considering all of the different ways that urinary leakage is affecting you, do you consider your current state to be satisfactory?" and provide a yes/no answer. Statistical analysis will then be performed to determine the threshold score at which one is likely to consider their symptoms to be acceptable, PASS "yes". Participants whose UDI score matches their PASS answer will be considered predicted and counted for this outcome measure.
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Minimal important difference (MID) of the Urinary Distress Inventory 6 (UDI 6 ) as determined by the anchor-based method of analysis
Time Frame: baseline to 6 weeks
The UDI-6 is a likert scale based questionnaire that calculates the mean of the scores and multiplies that mean by 25 to scale the instrument to an "actual score" with a range of 0 - 100 with a questions specifically related to stress urinary incontinence. The higher the score the greater perceived negative impact on an individual's quality of life The MID represents a clinically significant improvement in self-reported symptomatology. Anchor-based methods assess responsiveness in relation to an external event or rating to quantify the meaning of the particular degree of change. This is traditionally assessed by a moderate relationship noted using correlations between the negative score change and the external anchor. Participants will complete the UDI-6 at baseline and after 6 weeks. The MID will be defined by the mean score change reported by women who indicate improvement on the Patient Global Impression of severity (PGI-S) and Improvement (PGI-I).
baseline to 6 weeks
Mean Minimal important difference (MID) of the Urinary Distress Inventory 6 (UDI 6 ) as determined by the distribution-bases method of analysis
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The UDI-6 is a likert scale based questionnaire that calculates the mean of the scores and multiplies that mean by 25 to scale the instrument to an "actual score" with a range of 0 - 100 with a questions specifically related to stress urinary incontinence. The higher the score the greater perceived negative impact on an individual's quality of life The MID represents a clinically significant improvement in self-reported symptomatology. Distribution-based methods rely on the distribution of scores within a population and relate clinical significance to a change in magnitude at least equal to a statistical parameter of group data such as standard deviation (SD). This is traditionally assessed by including the effect size and standard error of measurement (SEM). A medium effect (0.5 SD) and a small effect size (0.2SD). The MID is estimated as 1 SEM.
6 weeks
Mean Minimal important difference (MID) of the Urinary Impact Questionnaire 7 (UIQ-7) as determined by the anchor-based method of analysis
Time Frame: baseline to 6 weeks
The UIQ-7 is a likert scale based questionnaire that calculates the mean of the scores and multiplies that mean by 25 to scale the instrument to an "actual score" with a range of 0 - 100. The higher the score the greater perceived negative impact on an individual's quality of life. The MID represents a clinically significant improvement in self-reported symptomatology. Anchor-based methods assess responsiveness in relation to an external event or rating to quantify the meaning of the particular degree of change. This is traditionally assessed by a moderate relationship noted using correlations between the negative score change and the external anchor. Participants will complete the UDI-6 at baseline and after 6 weeks. The MID will defined by the mean score change reported by women who indicate improvement on the Patient Global Impression of severity (PGI-S) and Improvement (PGI-I).
baseline to 6 weeks
Mean Minimal important difference (MID) of the Urinary Impact Questionnaire 7 (UIQ-7) as determined by the distribution-bases method of analysis
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The UIQ-7 is a likert scale based questionnaire that calculates the mean of the scores and multiplies that mean by 25 to scale the instrument to an "actual score" with a range of 0 - 100. The higher the score the greater perceived negative impact on an individual's quality of life The MID represents a clinically significant improvement in self-reported symptomatology. Distribution-based methods rely on the distribution of scores within a population and relate clinical significance to a change in magnitude at least equal to a statistical parameter of group data such as standard deviation (SD). This is traditionally assessed by including the effect size and standard error of measurement (SEM). A medium effect (0.5 SD) and a small effect size (0.2SD). The MID is estimated as 1 SEM.
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 14, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Incontinence

Clinical Trials on patient acceptable symptom state (PASS)

3
Subscribe