- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04069000
Mind Up (MindUP) Evaluation With Grade 3 Students
Implementing a Mindfulness-informed, Evidence-based Social and Emotional Program With Kindergarten Students Within a Trauma-informed Framework
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Design and Overview:
Social-emotional learning programs have a strong evidence base documenting their effectiveness. More recently, there has been increasing interest in social-emotional learning programs that include mindfulness; however, there is much less research on these programs, and much of the existing work has been hampered by small sample sizes. In this project, the investigators will examine the association between participation in the MindUP program and social-emotional outcomes in grade three students. The investigators are using a quasi-experimental design with pre-post data collection from students and educators. Students are nested in classrooms, and the clustered nature of the data will be accounted for in analyses. The study will identify changes in social-emotional behaviour, executive functioning, classroom climate, academic skills, and self-concept through a combination of teacher and self-report data using standardized scales.
Participants:
The investigators plan to recruit approximately 24 educators and 450 grade three students in approximately 24 classrooms. More or fewer classrooms will be recruited as needed to reach the intended sample size of 150 students in each of the three conditions.
Procedures:
The school district partnering on this project will identify 24 classrooms to participate. The first condition (~150 children in 8-10 classrooms) will participate in MindUP during the school year. The second condition (~150 children in 8-10 classrooms) includes children who have been participating in MindUP since kindergarten receiving the program in grade 3. The third group is a comparison condition where teachers will not implement the program. All implementing teachers will receive a half-day training on trauma-informed practice and a full-day training in MindUP before beginning the intervention.
Classroom teachers will send home consent forms for guardians to complete. Children will provide their own assent when the researchers come to classrooms to collect data. Surveys will be completed in October 2019 and again in May 2020. In November 2020, the students' grade 4 teachers will provide ratings for a 6-month follow-up.
To understand program implementation, educators will be asked to complete a brief online survey at the end of each week to report on their weekly engagement with MindUP lesson plans generally, and breathing breaks specifically. They will also be asked to report additional SEL activities. Educators in comparison classrooms will complete a weekly summary of their SEL learning activities as well.
Planned Analyses The primary comparisons will be between the group receiving MindUP for the first time versus the comparison groups (both immediately after intervention, and at 6-month follow-up). A secondary set of analyses will compare the group who have received MindUP for three years previously to the comparison group to see if they continue to make gains relative to the comparison group. Finally, we will also conduct moderator analyses using parent-reported adversity to test our hypothesis that students who have experienced more adversity will show greater gains.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
London, Ontario, Canada, N6G 1G7
- Western University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Decision to implement the MindUP program is made at the school level, with agreement from classroom teachers
- All students in a classroom in any of the three arms of the study are eligible to participate
Exclusion Criteria:
- Students with very low literacy or cognitive functioning may not be able to complete the self-report measures, but can still participate in the teacher-rating component of the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Regular grade 3 classrooms
Students in this condition will participate in the regular grade 3 program.
Educators will use their usual teaching methods to meet educational outcomes, including standards for social-emotional learning.
|
Grade 3 teachers are expected to implement activities to achieve a number of pre-specified social-emotional learning outcomes that are identified by the Ministry of Education.
Educators have leeway over how they achieve these curriculum expectations and they will report on a weekly basis regarding their implementation of social-emotional learning activities.
|
Experimental: First time MindUP participants
Students in this condition will participate in MindUP for the first time.
Their classroom teachers will receive training and implement the program during the school year.
|
Grade 3 teachers implement MindUP in their classrooms over the academic year.
MindUP is a manualized program informed by cognitive-developmental neuroscience, contemplative science, positive psychology, and social-emotional learning.
The curriculum consists of 15 sequential lessons taught in 10-15 minute chunks and cross-curricular extension activities.
There are four lesson units: Getting Focused (introduction to brain structure and function, the core practice, and how focused awareness affects brains and feelings), Sharpening Your Senses (focus on internal experiences such as mindful smelling and tasting), It's All About Attitude (focus on cognitive experiences such as positive mindset, perspective-taking, and practicing gratitude), and Taking Action Mindfully (performing acts of kindness to others and building positive relationships).
An essential component is the core practice, a focused breathing exercise and mindfulness practice that is implemented three times daily.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Repeat MindUP participants
Students in this condition are in schools where MindUP has been implemented since they were in kindergarten (although some students may not have participated in those first three years, depending on when they moved to the school).
Their classroom teachers will receive training and implement the program during the school year.
|
Grade 3 teachers implement MindUP in their classrooms over the academic year.
MindUP is a manualized program informed by cognitive-developmental neuroscience, contemplative science, positive psychology, and social-emotional learning.
The curriculum consists of 15 sequential lessons taught in 10-15 minute chunks and cross-curricular extension activities.
There are four lesson units: Getting Focused (introduction to brain structure and function, the core practice, and how focused awareness affects brains and feelings), Sharpening Your Senses (focus on internal experiences such as mindful smelling and tasting), It's All About Attitude (focus on cognitive experiences such as positive mindset, perspective-taking, and practicing gratitude), and Taking Action Mindfully (performing acts of kindness to others and building positive relationships).
An essential component is the core practice, a focused breathing exercise and mindfulness practice that is implemented three times daily.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Social and emotional learning
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention; one school year (approximately 6 months)
|
Composite Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) score from the Social Skills Improvement System-Social Emotional Learning Edition (SSIS-SEL); the score is transformed from a raw score based on norms provided in the manual; higher scores are better.
Scores are standardized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15.
|
Change from baseline to post-intervention; one school year (approximately 6 months)
|
Social and emotional learning (follow-up)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6-month follow-up; one calendar year
|
Composite Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) score from the Social Skills Improvement System-Social Emotional Learning Edition (SSIS-SEL); the score is transformed from a raw score based on norms provided in the manual; higher scores are better.
Scores are standardized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15.
|
Change from baseline to 6-month follow-up; one calendar year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Academic skills
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention; one school year (approximately 6 months)
|
Academic skills reported by teachers on SSIS-SEL and/or report card and standardized testing data.
Higher scores are better.
|
Change from baseline to post-intervention; one school year (approximately 6 months)
|
Social and Emotional Learning Subscales
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention; one school year (approximately 6 months)
|
Subscales from the SSIS-SEL (self-awareness; self management; social awareness; responsible decision-making; relationships); higher scores are better.
Scores are standardized and norm-referenced with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15.
|
Change from baseline to post-intervention; one school year (approximately 6 months)
|
Self-concept
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention; one school year (approximately 6 months)
|
Child's view of themselves as assessed by the Feelings, Attitudes, and Behaviors Scale for Children (FAB-C).
Higher scores are indicative of poorer functioning (i.e., feeling negative about oneself or feeling socially unaccepted).
T scores are used to interpret the level of concerns as reported by children on the FAB-C.
These scores are linear transformations of the raw scale scores (M = 50, SD = 10).
T scores provide information about an individual's scores relative to the scores of respondents in the standardization sample.
Percentiles represent the percentage of children in the standardization sample with scores at or below the same value.
For all FAB-C subscales, T scores over 60 are considered somewhat elevated and T scores over 65 are considered significantly elevated.
|
Change from baseline to post-intervention; one school year (approximately 6 months)
|
Class climate
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention; one school year (approximately 6 months)
|
Classroom cohesion and satisfaction as measured by the My Class Inventory-Short Form.
Both cohesion and satisfaction are measured with six yes/no items, such that children can score between 0 and 6 on each subscale.
If the two scales are moderately correlated (as expected give the age of the children), then we will sum them for one class climate scale (ranging from 0-12; higher scores indicate higher cohesion and satisfaction in the classroom).
|
Change from baseline to post-intervention; one school year (approximately 6 months)
|
Executive functioning
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention; one school year (approximately 6 months)
|
General executive control deficits as measured by the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second edition (BRIEF-2).
Higher scores are indicative of poorer functioning.
T scores are used to interpret the level of executive functioning as reported by teachers on the BRIEF-2 rating forms.
These scores are linear transformations of the raw scale scores (M = 50, SD = 10).
T scores provide information about an individual's scores relative to the scores of respondents in the standardization sample.
Percentiles represent the percentage of children in the standardization sample with scores at or below the same value.
For all BRIEF-2 clinical scales and indexes, T scores from 60 to 64 are considered mildly elevated, and T scores from 65 to 69 are considered potentially clinically elevated.
T scores at or above 70 are considered clinically elevated.
|
Change from baseline to post-intervention; one school year (approximately 6 months)
|
Executive functioning (follow-up)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6-month follow-up; one calendar year
|
General executive control deficits as measured by the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second edition (BRIEF-2).
Higher scores are indicative of poorer functioning.
T scores are used to interpret the level of executive functioning as reported by teachers on the BRIEF-2 rating forms.
These scores are linear transformations of the raw scale scores (M = 50, SD = 10).
T scores provide information about an individual's scores relative to the scores of respondents in the standardization sample.
Percentiles represent the percentage of children in the standardization sample with scores at or below the same value.
For all BRIEF-2 clinical scales and indexes, T scores from 60 to 64 are considered mildly elevated, and T scores from 65 to 69 are considered potentially clinically elevated.
T scores at or above 70 are considered clinically elevated.
|
Change from baseline to 6-month follow-up; one calendar year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Claire Crooks, PhD, Western University
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0000039458
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Child Development
-
Yale UniversityRobinhood Foundation; Adelphi University; Docs for TotsCompletedSocial Skills | Child Behavior | Child Development | Infant DevelopmentUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaSafe Water and AIDS Project (SWAP); Early Childhood Development Network for...RecruitingChild Behavior | Child Development | Language, ChildKenya
-
Windward Islands Research and Education FoundationGrand Challenges Canada; St. George's University; GRENCASECompletedDevelopment, Child | Behavior, Child | Neurocognition, ChildGrenada
-
London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh; University... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingChild Development | Child Development DisorderBangladesh, Tanzania, Nepal
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)Active, not recruitingDevelopment Delay | Development, ChildUnited States
-
The Hospital for Sick ChildrenAga Khan University; March of DimesCompletedChild Development | Child Mortality | Child Morbidity | Child BehaviourPakistan
-
O-KidiaRecruitingChild Development | Child Development DisorderFrance
-
University Hospital, RouenRecruitingChild Development | Child Mental Disorder | Adolescent Behavior | Child Behavior Disorders | Behavior, Child | Adolescent Development | Adolescent - Emotional Problem | Child Development DisorderFrance
-
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research...UnknownChild Behavior | Child DevelopmentBangladesh
-
Boston Medical CenterCenter for the Study of Social PolicyCompletedChild Abuse | Parenting | Child Development | Child Rearing | Child NeglectUnited States
Clinical Trials on Regular grade 3 program
-
University of ValenciaCompleted
-
American Institutes for ResearchCompletedSmoking Tobacco | Prevention of Drug Abuse and Dependency | Alcohol Abuse and Dependency | High Risk Sex Behavior | School FailureUnited States
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalCompletedChildren With Mobility Disabilities
-
University of Texas at AustinDriscoll Health PlanActive, not recruitingPregnancy Related | Nutrition, Healthy | Financial GiftUnited States
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityRecruitingOverweight | ExerciseTurkey
-
University of ChileComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaCompleted
-
University of MinhoNot yet recruitingCognitive Training
-
University Hospital, MontpellierCompletedInfant DevelopmentFrance
-
University of AarhusCompletedUterine Cervical Neoplasms | Uterine Cervical DysplasiaDenmark
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingChild DevelopmentPakistan