Exercise Prescription for the Improvement of Quality of Life in Elderly Patients With Multiple Myeloma

November 28, 2023 updated by: Thomas Jefferson University

A Pilot Study to Assess Adherence of an Exercise Prescription in Elderly Multiple Myeloma Patients

This trial studies how well exercise prescription works in improving quality of life in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. Engaging and adhering to an exercise program may improve functional status and quality of life and decrease pain and skeletal-related events. This study is being done to see if elderly patients with multiple myeloma can participate in a physical activity program.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. Assess the ability for elderly multiple myeloma patients to maintain a personalized exercise regimen and activity level for a period of 6 months.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:

I. Assess changes in biometric data.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE I. Evaluate changes in bone metabolism markers as a result of exercise.

OUTLINE:

Patients meet with a physical therapist on day 0 and at 3 and 6 months and receive a personalized home exercise intervention consisting of aerobic and resistance training for 6 months. Patients also receive face-to-face sessions, video chats, or text message check-ins with physical therapist weekly for 6 weeks and then every other week for up to 24 weeks.

After completion of study, patients are followed up every 6 months for 5 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

9

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of multiple myeloma
  • If patients are undergoing an autologous stem cell transplant, then they will be enrolled after their transplant so that there is not an interruption in the study period
  • Patients are eligible whether or not they have lytic bone lesions

    • If they do have lytic lesions, the lesions must be low risk for fracture (low risk by Mirel's score or less than 50% of vertebral body height)
    • If patients are high risk for bone fracture, they must undergo bone stabilization prior to being considered for enrollment
    • Patients will have to be at least 6 weeks from date of stabilization
  • Provide signed and dated informed consent form
  • Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study
  • Subjects need to be within 24 months of their multiple myeloma diagnosis
  • Subject must be able to stand and walk to perform baseline assessments
  • Subjects must be able to text message (will need cell phone)
  • Need to limit to able to read and understand English as video visit capability is only in English at this point in time and multiple questionnaires will not be translated into other languages

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of lytic lesions that cannot undergo appropriate stabilization
  • Anything that would place the individual at increased risk or preclude the individual's full compliance with or completion of the study
  • Non English speaking
  • Diagnosed greater than 24 months prior to screening

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Health Services Research (physical therapist, exercise)
Patients meet with a physical therapist on day 0 and at 3 and 6 months and receive a personalized home exercise intervention consisting of aerobic and resistance training for 6 months. Patients also receive face-to-face sessions, video chats, or text message check-ins with physical therapist weekly for 6 weeks and then every other week for up to 24 weeks.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Meet with physical therapist
Receive personalized home exercise intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical activity adherence
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Will be measured at each assessment using an Actigraph tri-axial hip-worn accelerometers, worn for 7 days at each assessment point, supplemented with patient self-report of exercise in the past 7 days using a physical activity recall to differentiate subtypes of physical activity. Will estimate the proportion of participants who maintained their target level, along with an exact 95% confidence interval. We will use an exact binomial test to assess whether adherence exceeds 50%. Adherence to the exercise prescriptions will be measured with the absolute and relative increase from baseline in min/week of aerobic and resistance exercise at 3 months and 6 months (benchmark: min/week of exercise changes by > 100% and a minimum of 90 min/week at 6 months). The percent of prescribed minutes of exercise performed at 3 and 6 months also will be calculated with goal of adherence greater than 50%.
Up to 6 months
Retention
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Will be measured by percent number of days the patient wears the provided FitBit during the 6-month period.
Up to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in short physical performance battery protocol
Time Frame: Baseline up to 6 months

The Short Physical Performance Battery Protocol is a test consisting of three sections (Balance, Gait Speed, and Chair Stand). The score for the Short Physical Performance Battery Protocol is scored as a total of the points earned in each section. Scores range from a total of 0 to 12 points.

Will use methods for paired data to estimate the mean difference, along with a 95% confidence interval. Will carry out additional analyses to assess the change of these outcomes over time, utilizing the repeated measurements obtained at all timepoints. Will use mixed-effects regression for all analyses.

Baseline up to 6 months
Change in 6 minute walk test
Time Frame: Baseline up to 6 months
Will use methods for paired data to estimate the mean difference, along with a 95% confidence interval. Will carry out additional analyses to assess the change of these outcomes over time, utilizing the repeated measurements obtained at all timepoints. Will use mixed-effects regression for all analyses.
Baseline up to 6 months
Change in grip strength
Time Frame: Baseline up to 6 months
Grip strength will be measured using a dynamometer, which gives results in kg of force. Will use methods for paired data to estimate the mean difference, along with a 95% confidence interval. Will carry out additional analyses to assess the change of these outcomes over time, utilizing the repeated measurements obtained at all timepoints. Will use mixed-effects regression for all analyses.
Baseline up to 6 months
Change in Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test
Time Frame: Baseline up to 6 months
Will use methods for paired data to estimate the mean difference, along with a 95% confidence interval. Will carry out additional analyses to assess the change of these outcomes over time, utilizing the repeated measurements obtained at all timepoints. Will use mixed-effects regression for all analyses.
Baseline up to 6 months
Change in frailty score
Time Frame: Baseline up to 6 months
Will use methods for paired data to estimate the mean difference, along with a 95% confidence interval. Will carry out additional analyses to assess the change of these outcomes over time, utilizing the repeated measurements obtained at all timepoints. Will use mixed-effects regression for all analyses.
Baseline up to 6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in bone metabolism markers
Time Frame: Baseline up to 6 months
Will include bone specific alkaline phosphatase, tartrate resistant acid phosphatase, C-terminal telopeptide fragment of type 1 collagen, and metabolomics signatures. Will trend metabolomics signatures as described above over time for individual participants and relate them to exercise adherence. Samples will be randomized in order to avoid machine drifts. All measurements will be carried out at least in triplicate and the false discovery rate will be used for hypothesis testing to determine the rate of type I errors when conducting multiple comparisons.
Baseline up to 6 months
Change in pain level
Time Frame: Baseline up to 6 months
Will be measured by Brief Pain Inventory. There are 9 total questions consisting of: 1 diagram, 1 yes/no, 1 item to list pain medications/treatments, 5 questions with an 11-point rating scale, and one question with sub-items A-G with an 11-point rating scale for each sub-item. Scored as follows: Pain Severity Score = Mean of items 3-6 (pain at its worst, pain at its least, average Pain Interference Score = Mean of items 9A-9G (interference of pain with: general activity, mood, walking, normal work, relations, sleep, enjoyment of life).
Baseline up to 6 months
Change in quality of life (QOL)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 6 months
Will be measured by European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer - QOL survey. There are 20 questions on a 4 point scale. Scores range from 0 to 100.
Baseline up to 6 months
Participant satisfaction
Time Frame: At 6 months
This is an 8 question survey with likert scale answers. Will be measured by a participant satisfaction questionnaire as well as open feedback questions to guide future studies.
At 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Adam Binder, MD, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 24, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 27, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 27, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Plasma Cell Myeloma

Clinical Trials on Quality-of-Life Assessment

3
Subscribe