PEEP Mask for Tracheobronchomalacia-Induced Cough

Non-invasive Positive Expiratory Pressure Mask (PEEP-Mask) for Tracheobronchomalacia Associated Cough

This study aims to determine if an expiratory resistance device that delivers non-invasive positive expiratory pressure (nPEP) will reduce or stop coughing, reduce airway resistance and improve quality of life in patients with tracheobronchomalacia (TBM) who are not candidates for tracheal stenting.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Tracheobronchomalacia
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: nPEP (non-invasive positive expiratory pressure) mask

Detailed Description

PROSPECTIVE:

Twenty subjects with chronic cough and TBM diagnosed by bronchoscopy or computed tomography (CT) scan will be recruited to enroll 12 participants. Comorbid conditions that can cause chronic cough, such as asthma, COPD, and GERD, must be treated if present, for subjects to qualify. At the pre-baseline visit (V0), after obtaining verbal informed consent, each subject will complete validated cough questionnaires to quantify their cough severity and cough-related QOL at baseline. The baseline visit (V1) will occur in-person approximately two weeks later, after a run-in period to minimize observation bias related to the cough questionnaires. Written consent will be performed at this visit. At V1, the cough questionnaires will be repeated and subjects' airway resistance and reactance will be measured with impulse oscillometry (IOS). A study physician will perform a physical exam and determine eligibility. Eligible subjects will then be given the nPEP device by the study team and instructed on its use. Approximately four to six weeks after device delivery, at the follow-up visit (V3), cough questionnaires and IOS will be repeated and they will be asked for feedback regarding device design and user experience. Subjects may then be entered into a cohort for up to six additional months, during which there will be no study visits or procedures, but subjects may be contacted by investigators for additional narrative feedback on the device and its use.

Study subjects will be given an nPEP device to use for four to six weeks. During this time participants will be asked to remain on their current medical regimen and not to make any dose changes or add new drugs, unless indicated by their primary care provider. Impulse oscillometry will be measured at V1 and 4-6 weeks later at V3 to assess effect of the nPEP device on airway physiology. A lung CT scan will be performed at V2.

RETROSPECTIVE:

This device was tried on two individuals and it was initiative and was beneficial. Many patients are not candidates for tracheobronchoplasty itself due to medical comorbidities, prefer to avoid the associated risks, or are not candidates for the required tracheal stenting due to trachea size or anatomy. These patients are left without a viable therapeutic option for their severe cough.

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices have been reported to stop or prevent cough in TBM, presumably through pneumatic stenting the large airways to maintain their patency during exhalation. CPAP devices, however, are not labeled for this indication and their functional utility is very limited given size of the device, need for a power source, and multiple steps to don the equipment that are not easily completed while actively and uncontrollably coughing.

The physicians aimed to provide positive airway pressure at a low cost and through readily accessible means, in order to abort coughing paroxysms in patients who were not candidates for tracheal stenting and did not have access to commercial CPAP devices. Patients at Duke University Hospital referred to the Interventional Pulmonary service for evaluation of severe, debilitating TBM-related cough and possible tracheal stenting, but who were not candidates for tracheal stenting given their airway anatomy, were given positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) masks assembled using existing hospital supplies. Specifically, a standard, adjustable (5-20 cm H2O) positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) valve manufactured for attachment to a manual resuscitation (commonly known as bag-valve-mask) device was attached directly to a flexible face mask, also from a manual resuscitation device. Patients were instructed by their physicians how to use the PEEP masks. The patients used the PEEP mask immediately during their clinical encounter and were given a mask to take home. (The device was created by fellow, Lindsay Boole.)

This was a limited intervention for a very small number of patients (two), specifically identified as being referred to Duke Interventional Pulmonary service with severe cough related to TBM, but with anatomy that ruled them out as candidates for tracheal stenting. There were no formal data collected and no separate follow-up for the purpose of this project (though patients had ongoing clinical follow-up per standard of care). The patients' subjective improvement with the masks was submitted as a case report abstract and poster at the American College of Chest Physician meeting in 2017.

Other physicians asked Dr. Boole about the mask and if it could be used for their patients. Therefore, the investigators would like to request a retrospective review of all patients that used the PEEP mask between January 1, 2009 and August 20, 2019 to be included in this pilot study. Approximately 15 records will be reviewed.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 10
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • North Carolina
    • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
      • Duke University Health System

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age ≥18 years
• Visualization of ≥50% collapse of the trachea or mainstem bronchus on CT scan or bronchoscopy
• No upper or lower respiratory infection within 4 weeks
• Having capacity to provide legal written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

• History of tracheobronchoplasty or chronic tracheal stenting
• Current tracheostomy
• History of external chest trauma

• History of:

  • Active treatment for Lung cancer
  • Lung transplantation
  • Unstable congestive heart failure
  • History of spontaneous pneumothorax
• Other medical conditions that interfere with participation in the study
• Pregnant women

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: nPEP Recipients; Single-patient, adjustable expiratory resistance device that provides positive pressure (5 to 20 cm H2O) during expiration	Device: nPEP (non-invasive positive expiratory pressure) mask; Positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) mask

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in Cough Severity as Measured by the Cough Visual Analog Scale (VAS)	The primary objective is to determine if use of the nPEP device will change cough severity. Responses to the Cough VAS range from 0-100 mm, with higher scores corresponding to worse outcomes.	Baseline, two weeks
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the Cough-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (CQLQ)	The CQLQ score ranges from 28 to 112, with higher scores corresponding to worse outcomes.	Baseline, two weeks
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ)	The LCQ score ranges from 19 to 133, with lower scores corresponding to worse outcomes.	Baseline, two weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Proximal Airway Reactance at 5 Hz (X5) as Assessed by Impulse Oscillometry	The secondary objective is to determine if use of the nPEP device changes airway physiology, specifically proximal airway reactance, as assessed by impulse oscillometry. Reactance at 5 Hz (X5) relates to the physical properties of the lung parenchyma and its ability to expand and facilitate alveolar filling. A more negative X5 value indicates less elasticity of the lung.	Baseline, two weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Duke University
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Loretta G Que, MD, Duke University

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): August 30, 2021
• Primary Completion (Actual): August 15, 2022
• Study Completion (Actual): August 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: November 14, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 18, 2019
• First Posted (Actual): November 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): September 28, 2023
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: September 1, 2023
• Last Verified: September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: cough; tracheobronchomalacia; TBM
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Respiratory Tract Diseases; Congenital Abnormalities; Bronchial Diseases; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Connective Tissue Diseases; Musculoskeletal Abnormalities; Cartilage Diseases; Tracheal Diseases; Tracheobronchomalacia; Bronchomalacia
• Other Study ID Numbers: Pro00102498

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: Yes
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No