Comparison of an Inhaled Sedation Strategy to an Intravenous Sedation Strategy in Intensive Care Unit Patients Treated With Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (INASED)

January 11, 2024 updated by: University Hospital, Brest

Comparison of an Inhaled Sedation Strategy to an Intravenous Sedation Strategy in Intensive Care Unit Patients Treated With Invasive Mechanical Ventilation : INASED Study

The objective of the study is to determine the impact on the frequency of occurrence of delirium of an early inhaled sedation strategy (from induction in rapid sequence if intubation in intensive care, or from admission if intubated in pre -hospital) by Isoflurane using an ANACONDA ™ type system, compared to a conventional intravenous sedation strategy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Sedation-analgesia is used in most patients treated with mechanical ventilation (MV). The usual benzodiazepine and morphine sedation reduces pain and anxiety and allows tolerance of invasive procedures in intensive care. These molecules, used as part of the sedation titration protocol or the daily sedation stop protocol, have improved patient outcomes.

Although necessary, these drugs, by mechanisms still uncertain, would promote the occurrence of resuscitation delirium. Delirium itself responsible for worsening morbidity and mortality (increase in the duration of MV, increase in the length of hospital stay, discussed increase in mortality, long-term cognitive sequelae).

This finding favored the use of new drugs in the sedation strategies of patients on MV. Dexmedetomidine has for example reduced the number of days of delirium, the number of days of coma and even mortality in septic patients. Its large-scale use has however been questioned by a recent study.

Halogenated gases have been used for a long time in anesthesia. Their pharmacodynamics, their positive and adverse effects, their therapeutic margins are well known. Thanks to technical innovations they can be used on resuscitation respirators. Several studies on targeted populations have shown the feasibility and the benefits of this use, in particular, the absence of accumulation, the absence of tachyphylaxis, the broad therapeutic range, the small interindividual variation, the rapidity of efficacy and the speed of awakening. Safety in use for the staff in charge of the patient is established. In addition, their potential neuroprotective effect would make it an anesthetic of choice in the prevention of resuscitation delirium.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

250

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Bourges, France, 18000
      • Brest, France, 29200
      • Corbeil-Essonnes, France, 91106
        • Recruiting
        • CH Corbeil Essonnes
        • Contact:
      • Le Mans, France, 72039
        • Recruiting
        • CH Le Mans
        • Contact:
      • Lorient, France, 56322
      • Melun, France, 77000
      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • Suspended
        • CHU Montpellier
      • Morlaix, France, 29672
        • Recruiting
        • CH Morlaix
        • Contact:
      • Poitiers, France, 86021
      • Rennes, France, 35033
      • Tours, France, 37044
      • Tours, France, 37044
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU Tours - Réanimation Chirurgicale
        • Contact:
          • Mathilde BARBAZ
          • Phone Number: 07.62.12.70.34
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged 18 and over
  • Patient requiring mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours
  • The patient requires continuous and immediate sedation for more comfort, safety and to facilitate the administration of survival measures.
  • Consent obtained from patient or relative

Exclusion Criteria:

Patient hospitalized for the following reasons for admission:

  • Cardiac arrest
  • State of refractory epilepticus
  • Head trauma
  • Stroke

    • Hearing, visual or aphasia disorders before inclusion making it impossible to take the CAM-ICU
    • Sedation started more than 24 hours ago
    • Impairment of cognitive functions and / or dementia
    • Contraindication to halogenated gases (personal or family history of malignant hyperthermia, acute or chronic neuromuscular disease, hepatocellular insufficiency with PT <30%)
    • Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (Berlin criteria: PaO2 / FiO2 <100 after ventilatory optimisation))
    • PaCO2 at inclusion> 50 mmHg after ventilatory optimisation
    • Patient for whom a procedure of "limitation of active therapies" is envisaged at inclusion
    • Patient under guardianship or curatorship
    • Minor patient
    • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
    • Patient not affiliated to the social security scheme

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Usual sedation
Sedation according to a written, standardized Nurse management protocol using at least one sedative drug (propofol) and one analgesic drug.
sedation according to a written, standardized Nurse management protocol using at least one sedative drug (propofol) and one analgesic drug. It uses the nurse driven analgesia protocol of each ward involved in the study. It uses a pain assessment score (BPS, VICOMORE, FLACC), local or regional anesthesia, non-opioïd adjuncts (acetaminophen, NSAIDs, nefopam), opioïds (per os opioïds, bolus of sufentanyl followed by continuous infusion if necessary, continuous infusion of remifentanyl
Experimental: Inhaled sedation
Sedation by inhalation of halogenated gas (Isoflurane) delivered by the Anesthetic-Conserving Device (ACD) system ANACONDA ™ associated with the administration of an analgesic drug.
sedation by inhalation of halogenated gas (Isoflurane) delivered by the Anesthetic-Conserving Device (ACD) system ANACONDA ™ associated with the administration of a analgesic drug. It uses the nurse driven analgesia protocol of each ward involved in the study. It uses a pain assessment score (BPS, VICOMORE, FLACC), local or regional anesthesia, non-opioïd adjuncts (acetaminophen, NSAIDs, nefopam), opioïds (per os opioïds, bolus of sufentanyl followed by continuous infusion if necessary, continuous infusion of remifentanyl.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occurrence of a delirium in intensive care
Time Frame: 28 days
Occurrence of delirium in intensive care will be observed (yes / no)
28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality in intensive care
Time Frame: Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days
Mortality in intensive care will be observed
Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days
Mortality at day 28
Time Frame: 28 days
Mortality at day 28 will be observed
28 days
Hospital cost per patient
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
The average cost of hospitalization for each patient will be calculated taking into account their length of hospital stay, examinations carried out and medical treatment taken.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Number of days with vasopressors or inotropic agents
Time Frame: Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days
Number of days with vasopressors or inotropic agents will be observed
Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days
Number of days with sedation
Time Frame: Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days
Number of days with sedation will be observed
Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days
Cumulative dose anesthetics drugs
Time Frame: Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days
Cumulative dose anesthetics drugs will be observed
Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days
Duration of anesthetics drugs
Time Frame: Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days
Duration of anesthetics drugs will be observed
Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days
Maximum dose of vasopressors or inotropic agents
Time Frame: Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days
Maximum dose of vasopressors or inotropic agents will be observed
Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days
Ventilation free days at 28 days following randomisation
Time Frame: 28 days
Ventilation free days at 28 days following randomisation will be observed
28 days
Incidence of delirium
Time Frame: 28 days
Incidence of delirium will be observed
28 days
Duration of delirium
Time Frame: 28 days
Duration of delirium will be observed
28 days
Length of ICU stay
Time Frame: Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days
Length of ICU stay will be calculated
Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days
Requirement of patients physical restraints
Time Frame: Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days
Requirement of physical restraints, of patients with unplanned extubation, unplanned catheter, urinary probe or gastric probe removal will be observed
Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days
Self aggressive act
Time Frame: Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days
Self aggressive act will be observed
Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days
Hetero-aggressive act
Time Frame: Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days
Hetero-aggressive act will be observed
Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days
Evaluation of cognitive functions
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

Cognitive function will be evaluated at discharge, 3- and 12 months using two kinds of score :

  • Cantab test, combining 6 cognitive evaluations with an iPad during a 45-60 minutes medical consultation
  • PCLS (Posttraumatic stress disorder Checklist Scale), HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale), SF36 (medical outcome study short form 36), IADL (instrumental activities of daily living) practised by a clinical research associate
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pierre Bailly, MD, CHRU Brest

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 6, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All collected data that underlie results in a publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available after the publication of result and ending fifteen years following the last visit of the last patient

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data access requests will be reviewed by the internal committee of Brest UH. Requestors will be required to sign and complete a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prevention of Delirium

Clinical Trials on Propofol + analgesic drug

3
Subscribe