Surgical Planning With Patient-specific Pancreaticobiliary Disease With 3D Models

May 29, 2020 updated by: Figen GOVSA, Ege University

Ethical Committee at Researches of Ege University

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) printing has been increasingly used in medical applications with the creation of accurate patient-specific 3D printed models in medical imaging data. However, research on 3D printing in pancreaticobiliary disease is limited with lack of studies on validation of model accuracy.

Methods: This is a where general surgery residents, are introduced to 5 distinct hepatopancreatobiliary disease scenarios to generate a perception and required to compare their perception level of these cases with computed tomography (CT), 3D images and 1:1 solid models that the pathology, diverse diagnosis and presurgery diagnosis stages can be investigated.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

2.1.Research Design This study group are general surgery residents present in Faculty of Medicine, Ege University (n=19). A quintet with stations composed of normal pancreaticobiliary anatomy, common bile duct tumor, stony cholecystitis, pancreatic head cancer and cholelithiasis is assembled for the study. Each station containes CT, 3D-STL images and 1:1 solid models of cases. Each imaging method (CT, 3D-STL image and 3D solid model) associated with the scenarios of the quintet is created in the residents of the study. An explanatory assessment measure is being used as data collection method where the perception of each imaging method is being investigated based on their effectiveness in problem identification as well as their efficiency in diverse diagnosis and pre-surgery organization.

2.2. Selection of the sample cases The patients are chosen among the CT examinations of the ones who referred to Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery for diagnose and treatment between 2016 and 2018. CT archives are screened and 5 eligible patients (age: 18-62 year) who required hepatopancreatobiliary surgery were selected. Selection of the cases is based on patients with no previous hepatopancreatobiliary operation, pathology leading to dilated biliary duct, and whose radiological imaging results are suitable for modeling. Virtual modeling of pancreaticobiliary pathways of the cases is performed and clinical histories of each case were created.

2.3. Scenarios As a mutual agreement among the specialists in medical education, general surgery, anatomy and radiology, 5 cases identified, are elected to be samples for pancreaticobiliary surgical processes. Having defined these cases, they are further converted into genuine scenarios fully equipped with a past story, medical analysis results and imaging procedures.

Scenarios for 5 cases:

Case 1. Case with normal extrahepatic biliary tract with pancreas. Case 2. Choledochal tumor leading to advanced dilatation and hydropic gallbladder appearance in extrahepatic biliary tract.

Case 3. Acute cholecystitis characterized with extrahepatic biliary dilatation, hydropic gallbladder, thickness in gallbladder wall and biliary sludge with multiple millimeter-sized stones.

Case 4. Pancreatic head cancer with severe dilatation in the pancreatic canal and extrahepatic biliary tract.

Case 5. Choledocholithiasis characterized with dilatation at the extrahepatic biliary tract and 7 mm diameter stone at the distal end of the common bile duct.

2.4. Image post-processing and segmentation Original CT images in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format are converted to a separate workstation with Analyze 12.0 for post-processing and segmentation. A free 3D slicer (version 4.10.1) is employed in the process of attaining DICOM output from CT and MRI segments of the patients. Special attention is paid to the anatomical structures of the biliary tract including left hepatic duct (LHD), right hepatic duct (RHD), and common hepatic duct (CHD) which are segmented. The surface condition of the model is enhanced by implementing a softening filter to the segmented section output. The output is extracted into STL format to enable 3D printing.

2.5. Creating Life-size Patient-Specific 3D Model 3D printers of Mass Portal Pharaoh xd 20 and Form Labs2 are employed throughout the process of preparing the models for printing.

2.6. Quantitative assessment of model accuracy To ensure the model accuracy, measurements of the anatomical landmarks are performed and compared at three stages of the model production, namely, the original CT images, STL file and 3D model. The internal diameter of four anatomical locations is measured from left to right and from anterior to posterior in the following landmarks: CHD, LHD, RHD and common bile ducts. .

2.7. Workshop We performed a systematic review to evaluate of bile tree modelization and 3D printing, as well as the proof of concept of the benefit of 3D solid model in planning interventions. CT images of a patient diagnosed with dilated extrahepatic ducts are used to create the patient-specific, 1-1 scale 3D pancreaticobiliary models including five scenarios as the normal anatomy, common bile duct tumor, stony cholecystitis, pancreatic head cancer and cholelithiasis. For this purpose, scenarios for each case and a five-station carousel are based on the research. For each station, a period of 5-10 minutes is given.

2.8. Survey Participants' perception of residency training is evaluated with a multi-entry survey. In these scenarios, normal pancreaticobiliary organs and cases leading to extrahepatic biliary tract dilatation such as choledochal tumor, acute stone cholecystitis, pancreatic head tumor and cholelithiasis are discussed. Assessment forms for the normal structure of the cases, differential diagnosis and imaging methods in preoperative planning and the location of the 3D solid model are prepared. The forms are then asked to be filled by the residents to discover their opinions on all models. The evaluaton is done on a scale of 10, where (01-10) defines 0 = very low and 10 = the highest rank.

2.9. Statistical analysis Analysis will be submitted into SPSS 24.0 for statistical evaluation mean ± standard deviation format is employed for continuous variables. Any significant differences in the measurements between the original CT images, 3D-STL images and the 3D model are studied by using Wilcoxon Signed Test. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test is used to determine any significant differences in the measurements between the original CT images, 3D-STL images and the 3D model. Statistical relevance is stated as a p value of less than 0.05.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bornova
      • Izmir, Bornova, Turkey, TR-35100
        • EGE University, Faculty of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

24 years to 30 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Members chosen for this study group are general surgery residents present in Faculty of Medicine, Ege University

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • normal pancreaticobiliary anatomy case
  • common bile duct tumor case,
  • acute calculous cholecystitis,
  • pancreatic head cancer
  • cholelithiasis
  • general surgery residents present in Faculty of Medicine, Ege University

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hepatic disease
  • General surgery experts

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
compare the effectiveness of the solid model with CT screen, 3D-Standard Tessellation Language (STL) image and 1:1 scale model
Time Frame: 30 minute
Our aim is to compare the effectiveness of the solid model with CT screen, 3D-Standard Tessellation Language (STL) image and 1:1 scale model in 5 different hepatopancreatobiliary disease scenarios to general surgery residents in terms of recognizing the pathology, differential diagnosis and preoperative preparation stages.
30 minute

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Muhtar S Ersin, Prof. Dr, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 10, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EGE18-6.134

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Our aim is to compare the effectiveness of the solid model with CTimage, 3Dimage and 3Dmodel in 5 different hepatopancreatobiliary disease scenarios presented to general surgery residents in terms of recognizing the pathology, differential diagnosis and preoperative preparation stages. The focus of the survey applied by our team was on domains, decision-making, diverse diagnosis, scientific appraisal. In these scenarios, normal pancreaticobiliary organs and cases leading to extrahepatic biliary tract dilatation such as choledochal tumor, acute stone cholecystitis, pancreatic head tumor and cholelithiasis were discussed. Perception of the anatomical formation, impact of the procedure to diverse diagnosis, operation arrangement and presurgical preparation assistance are the main criteria in the evaluation of every imaging procedure. Any significant differences in the measurements between the CTimages, 3Dimages and the 3Dmodel were obtained by using Wilcoxon Signed Test.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgical Injury

Clinical Trials on survey

3
Subscribe