- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04450914
Implementing Shared Decision Making (SDM) For Individualized CV Prevention (SDM4IP) (SDM4IP)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The primary prevention of cardiovascular (CV) events is often more intense in individuals at lower risk and vice versa (the so called "risk-treatment paradox") in part due to unawareness of each person's CV risk, of their preferences for prevention interventions, and of their feasibility in each person's daily life. Clinical practice guidelines recommend that clinicians and patients work together to arrive at an effective and feasible prevention plan that is congruent with each person's CV risk and informed preferences, a process called shared decision making (SDM). Despite the availability of an innovative and effective tool that estimates CV risk, shows the impact and features of available lifestyle and pharmacological preventive interventions, and thus can facilitate CV treatment discussions between clinicians and patients, this type of SDM does not routinely happen in practice.
The challenge therefore is to identify strategies to increase adoption of this type of SDM in real-world clinical practices. This 4-year study - proposed by a multidisciplinary team with expertise in preventive cardiology, SDM, and implementation science - aims to integrate an SDM tool (the CV Prevention Choice tool) in the primary care practices of three diverse health care systems in the U.S. and study both the tool and tailored strategies that foster its adoption and routine use. The study will use a mixed method, hybrid implementation-effectiveness (Type III) step-wedge clustered randomized trial design to determine:
- Implementation effectiveness (Aim 1) by evaluating the settings (including local workflow and policies) in which the CV Prevention Choice tool is implemented and the engagement of users in implementation strategies; implementation outcomes (e.g., reach, adoption) associated with these strategies; and how implementation fosters routine adoption of SDM and the CV Prevention Choice tool in primary care practices, and
- SDM effectiveness (Aim 2) estimated by the extent to which individual CV prevention plans are feasible and congruent with each person's estimated CV risk and preferences.
The investigators hypothesize that efforts to assess local needs and use them to develop tailored implementation approaches will foster greater adoption of SDM in practice. They further hypothesize that individual preventive care plans will be congruent with estimated risk when clinicians adopt the SDM tool. The broad goal is to promote patient-centered care that effectively reduces the substantial burden of CV disease among Americans. By the project's end, the investigators expect to have (a) identified the most effective implementation strategies to embed SDM in routine practice and (b) estimated the effectiveness of SDM to achieve feasible and risk-concordant CV prevention in primary care.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Georgia
-
Marietta, Georgia, United States, 30060
- WellStar Health System
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
- Mayo Clinic
-
-
North Dakota
-
Grand Forks, North Dakota, United States, 58201
- Altru Health System
-
-
Virginia
-
Arlington, Virginia, United States, 22205
- VHC Health
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinician Participants: All clinicians who are affiliated with a participating primary care practice and care for adult patients eligible for CV prevention will be invited to participate.
- Patient Participants: Adult patients (ages 40-75 years) with or without diabetes who have not experienced an atherothrombotic clinical event and receive preventive care at a participating primary care practice will be eligible to participate.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals who do not speak English or have any sort of cognitive deficit that would impact their ability to consent to participate in the study will not be invited to participate.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Other: Health Systems - First Step
Each health system will consist of clinicians who are affiliated with primary care practices and patients who are eligible for CV primary prevention discussions.
In the first step, health systems will be assigned to usual care (passive implementation of CV Prevention Choice).
|
The CV Prevention Choice SDM tool is a shared decision making intervention.
It is embedded in the electronic health record and uses EHR data to estimate and display cardiovascular risk for individual patients and then foster conversations between clinicians and patients about available options for preventive care based on individual risk and preferences.
|
Other: Health Systems - Second Step
Each health system will consist of clinicians who are affiliated with primary care practices and patients who are eligible for CV primary prevention discussions.
In the second step, health systems (in an order to be determined by randomization and staggered over time) will move into active implementation.
|
The CV Prevention Choice SDM tool is a shared decision making intervention.
It is embedded in the electronic health record and uses EHR data to estimate and display cardiovascular risk for individual patients and then foster conversations between clinicians and patients about available options for preventive care based on individual risk and preferences.
During the active implementation stage, health systems will deploy tailored implementation facilitation and other tailored implementation strategies aimed at increasing adoption and use of shared decision making using CV Prevention Choice.
|
Other: Health Systems - Third Step
Each health system will consist of clinicians who are affiliated with primary care practices and patients who are eligible for CV primary prevention discussions.In the third step, all health systems will move to maintenance implementation.
|
The CV Prevention Choice SDM tool is a shared decision making intervention.
It is embedded in the electronic health record and uses EHR data to estimate and display cardiovascular risk for individual patients and then foster conversations between clinicians and patients about available options for preventive care based on individual risk and preferences.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Reach metrics
Time Frame: Q1/Year 2 through Q3/Year 4
|
Proportion of eligible clinicians who accessed CV Prevention Choice (among all eligible clinicians), as indicated by EHR user metrics.
Higher proportions indicate greater reach.
|
Q1/Year 2 through Q3/Year 4
|
Effectiveness perceptions
Time Frame: Q1/Year 2 through Q3/Year 4
|
Qualitative findings of the perceptions of tool effectiveness, as assessed through interviews and focus groups with eligible clinicians.
|
Q1/Year 2 through Q3/Year 4
|
Adoption metrics
Time Frame: Q1/Year 2 through Q3/Year 4
|
Proportion of eligible clinicians that used CV Prevention Choice in encounters identified in the EHR as being eligible for a CV preventive care discussion (among all eligible visits), as indicated by EHR user metrics.
Higher proportions indicate greater adoption.
|
Q1/Year 2 through Q3/Year 4
|
Adoption perceptions
Time Frame: Q1/Year 2 through Q3/Year 4
|
Qualitative findings of reasons for adoption of or failure to adopt CV Prevention Choice, as assessed through interviews and focus groups with eligible clinicians.
|
Q1/Year 2 through Q3/Year 4
|
Implementation fidelity
Time Frame: Q1/Year 4 through Q3/Year 4
|
A sample of SDM clinical encounters will be audio-video recorded.
Recordings will be reviewed and scored according to a five-point SDM fidelity checklist.
Higher scores indicate greater fidelity to the core components of SDM.
|
Q1/Year 4 through Q3/Year 4
|
Implementation SDM quality
Time Frame: Q1/Year 4 through Q3/Year 4
|
Adherence to SDM quality will be assessed among a sample of patients with SDM clinical encounters using the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) questionnaire.
Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of SDM occurring in the encounter.
Range of scores is 0 to 100.
|
Q1/Year 4 through Q3/Year 4
|
Implementation care quality
Time Frame: Q1/Year 4 through Q3/Year 4
|
Care quality will be assessed among a sample of patients with SDM clinical encounters using the 10-item CARE Patient Feedback Measure.
Higher scores are indicative of higher patient reported relational empathy in the consultation.
Range of scores is 10 to 50.
|
Q1/Year 4 through Q3/Year 4
|
Maintenance metrics
Time Frame: Q1/Year 4 through Q3/Year 4
|
Change in CV PREVENTION CHOICE use, as indicated by EHR user metrics for eligible clinicians, at the start and end of the maintenance stage.
Equivalent or higher use at the end of the maintenance stage indicates maintenance of the tool as part of routine practice.
|
Q1/Year 4 through Q3/Year 4
|
Maintenance self-report
Time Frame: Q1/Year 4 through Q3/Year 4
|
The NoMAD questionnaire will be administered to clinicians to assess normalization of CV Prevention Choice into practice.
The NoMAD questionnaire is a continuous outcome converted to a 0-100 point scale, where higher scores indicate higher levels or normalization of CV Prevention Choice into routine care.
|
Q1/Year 4 through Q3/Year 4
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
SDM Effectiveness
Time Frame: Q1/Year 2 through Q3/Year 4
|
The assessment of statin prescription post encounter of interest is congruent with the patient estimated CV Risk based off EHR data.
|
Q1/Year 2 through Q3/Year 4
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jennifer Ridgeway, PhD, Mayo Clinic
- Principal Investigator: Victor Montori, MD, Mayo Clinic
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20-002772
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Risk
-
University of Split, School of MedicineCompletedCardiovascular Risk Factor | Lifestyle Risk ReductionCroatia
-
University of Southern DenmarkRegion of Southern Denmark; Odense Patient Data Explorative Network; ENIGMA Solutions... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingCardiovascular Risk Factor | Risk CommunicationDenmark
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonTerminatedHigh Cardiovascular Risk Patients | Low Cardiovascular Risk PatientsFrance
-
Universidad Católica San Antonio de MurciaCompleted
-
University of PittsburghAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)CompletedCardiovascular RiskUnited States
-
Uppsala UniversityCompletedCardiovascular Risk Factor | Lifestyle Risk Reduction | Primary Care
-
Universiti Putra MalaysiaBeacon Hospital Sdn BhdNot yet recruiting
-
Universidad Católica San Antonio de MurciaCompletedTo Evaluate the Efficacy of a Nutraceutical in Reducing Cardiovascular Risk in Healthy Subjects (JC)Cardiovascular RiskSpain
-
University of DundeeUniversity of St AndrewsCompletedCardiovascular Risk
-
AstraZenecaCompleted
Clinical Trials on CV Prevention Choice Tool
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD); Florida...CompletedSexually Transmitted Diseases | Human Immunodeficiency Virus TransmissionUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD); Florida...RecruitingSexually Transmitted Diseases | Human Immunodeficiency Virus | Human Immunodeficiency Virus TransmissionUnited States
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalMassachusetts General Hospital; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; North Shore Medical...Completed
-
Oslo University HospitalThe Research Council of NorwayCompletedLymphoma | Leukemia | Cancer | Stem Cell Transplantation
-
University of FloridaNot yet recruitingCervical Cancer Screening Methods
-
NYU Langone HealthNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)Recruiting
-
Lara McKenzieCompletedIntervention-carbon Monoxide Alarm + Educational Tool | Control- Usual Care Flyer on Carbon MonoxideUnited States
-
Nantes University HospitalFor Ever FabienRecruitingChild, Only | Hematologic Malignancy | Hematologic Non Malignancy | Solid Tumor, ChildhoodFrance
-
Fundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares...London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; Ferrer Internacional S.A.; Charite... and other collaboratorsCompletedMyocardial Infarction | Cardiovascular DiseaseSpain, Germany, France, Czechia, Hungary, Italy, Poland
-
George Washington UniversityNew York University; The Miriam HospitalCompletedHuman Immunodeficiency VirusUnited States