CoV-PICS: A Virtual Post-ICU Clinic

June 2, 2022 updated by: Chris M Palmer, Washington University School of Medicine

COVID-19 Virtual Post Intensive Care Syndrome (CoV-PICS) Clinic: Modern, Convenient and Practical Recovery Care

This is a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of a COVID-19 virtual Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) clinic (CoV-PICS). The findings from this study are the first steps in determining the feasibility and potential impact of a telehealth PICS clinic that is able to address the needs of patients with COVID-19 disease and potentially other patients that are unable to attend a brick and mortar clinic and require virtual care.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes-Jewish Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older
  • COVID-19 diagnosis with a stay in the ICU.
  • A home internet connection or smartphone access, along with the ability to use them
  • Missouri resident

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cognitive deficits or dementia prior to hospitalization
  • Long-term resident of a skilled nursing facility prior to admission
  • Non-English speaking (will not have an interpreter available)
  • Hospice or Comfort Care at discharge
  • No plans to return to some degree of independent living at the time of discharge
  • Pregnant at the time of discharge
  • Prisoner at the time of discharge
  • Blind
  • Deaf

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients with PICS
Patient characteristics, medical history, and information regarding their inpatient treatment from the electronic medical record
Patients will complete online questionnaires related to their physical, cognitive and mental health function and inquire about current treatments. The multiprofessional CoV-PICS clinic practitioners will evaluate their responses and, combined with information obtained during their virtual visits, formulate a suggested treatment plan and needed referrals.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptance With COVID-19 Virtual Post Intensive Care Syndrome (CoV-PICS) Visits - AIM
Time Frame: up to 6 months after consent
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) Implementation of outcome measure. Response Scale: 1 = Completely disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree, 4 = Agree, 5 = Completely agree
up to 6 months after consent
Acceptance With COVID-19 Virtual Post Intensive Care Syndrome (CoV-PICS) Visits - IAM
Time Frame: up to 6 months after consent
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) Implementation of outcome measure. Response Scale: 1 = Completely disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree, 4 = Agree, 5 = Completely agree
up to 6 months after consent
Acceptance With COVID-19 Virtual Post Intensive Care Syndrome (CoV-PICS) Visits - FIM
Time Frame: up to 6 months after consent
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) Implementation of outcome measure. Response Scale: 1 = Completely disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree, 4 = Agree, 5 = Completely agree
up to 6 months after consent

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Symptoms - Daily Living - Visit 1
Time Frame: Up to 6 months after consent
Katz Independence in Activities in Daily Living Rates daily activities by independence or dependence in completing the task (range 0-6) 0=low or patient very dependent, 6 = high or patient independent
Up to 6 months after consent
Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Symptoms - Daily Living - Visit 2
Time Frame: Approximately 60 days after initial visit (scheduling dependent)
Katz Independence in Activities in Daily Living Rates daily activities by independence or dependence in completing the task (range 0-6) 0=low or patient very dependent, 6 = high or patient independent
Approximately 60 days after initial visit (scheduling dependent)
Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Systems - Cognitive Visit 1
Time Frame: Up to 6 months after consent
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Screening tool for mild cognitive dysfunction. Scores range from 0 to 15 with scores of 11 and above considered normal and below 11 considered cognitive impairment.
Up to 6 months after consent
Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Systems - Cognitive Visit 2
Time Frame: Approximately 60 days after initial visit (scheduling dependent)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Screening tool for mild cognitive dysfunction. Scores range from 0 to 15 with scores of 11 and above considered normal and below 11 considered cognitive impairment
Approximately 60 days after initial visit (scheduling dependent)
Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Systems - Nutrition Initial Visit
Time Frame: Up to 6 months after consent

Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) The Scored PG-SGA© includes the four patient-generated historical components (Weight History, Food Intake, Symptoms and Activities and Function - also known as the PG-SGA Short Form©), the professional part, the Global Assessment, the total numerical score (0-1 No risk, 2-3 Mild risk, 4-8 Moderate risk, 9 or more High risk), and nutritional triage recommendations based on the score.

For each component of the PG-SGA, points (0-4) are awarded depending on the impact on nutritional status. Typical scores range from 0-35 with a higher score reflecting a greater risk of malnutrition and scores ≥9 indicating a critical need for nutrition intervention and symptom management

0-1: no intervention 2-3: patient and family education by dietician or nurse 4-8: requires intervention by dietician >9: critical need for symptom intervention

Up to 6 months after consent
Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Systems - Nutrition Final Visit
Time Frame: Approximately 60 days after initial visit (scheduling dependent)

Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) The Scored PG-SGA© includes the four patient-generated historical components (Weight History, Food Intake, Symptoms and Activities and Function - also known as the PG-SGA Short Form©), the professional part, the Global Assessment, the total numerical score (0-1 No risk, 2-3 Mild risk, 4-8 Moderate risk, 9 or more High risk), and nutritional triage recommendations based on the score.

For each component of the PG-SGA, points (0-4) are awarded depending on the impact on nutritional status. Typical scores range from 0-35 with a higher score reflecting a greater risk of malnutrition and scores ≥9 indicating a critical need for nutrition intervention and symptom management

0-1: no intervention 2-3: patient and family education by dietician or nurse 4-8: requires intervention by dietician >9: critical need for symptom intervention

Approximately 60 days after initial visit (scheduling dependent)
Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Symptoms - Memory
Time Frame: up to 6 months after consent

ICU Memory Tool (all inclusive tool that measures multiple items as described below)

Questionnaire of patient's memory and feelings of ICU stay. Outcomes reported as the total number of memory types per group: factual memories, memories of feelings, delusional memories, unexplained feelings of panic, intrusive memories.

up to 6 months after consent

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chris Palmer, MD, Washington University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 29, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 202007053

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post ICU Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Medical Record Review - Inpatient Treatment

3
Subscribe