Minimally Invasive Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Stage IIIC-IV Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube Cancer, LANCE Trial

October 27, 2023 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Laparoscopic Cytoreduction After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

This phase III trial compares minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to laparotomy in treating patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer who are receiving chemotherapy before and after surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy). MIS is a surgical procedure that uses small incision(s) and is intended to produce minimal blood loss and pain for the patient. Laparotomy is a surgical procedure which allows the doctors to remove some or all of the tumor and check if the disease has spread to other organs in the body. MIS may work the same or better than standard laparotomy after chemotherapy in prolonging the return of the disease and/or improving quality of life after surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To examine whether MIS is non-inferior to laparotomy in terms of disease free survival (DFS) in women with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) that received 3 to 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine if there are differences in health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in patients undergoing MIS versus (vs) laparotomy as assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30), QLQ-Ovarian Cancer Module (OV28), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G7).

II. To determine if there are differences between patients undergoing MIS vs laparotomy in the rate of optimal cytoreduction (defined as residual tumor nodules each measuring 1 cm or less in maximum diameter) and complete cytoreduction (defined as no evidence of macroscopic disease).

III. To examine whether MIS is non-inferior to laparotomy in terms of overall survival (OS) in women with advanced stage EOC that received 3 to 4 cycles of NACT.

IV. To determine if there are differences between patients undergoing MIS vs laparotomy in surgical morbidity and mortality, intraoperative injuries, and post-operative complications.

V. To determine the rates of MIS converted to laparotomy and the reasons.

VI. To determine if there are any difference in costs and cost-effectiveness between patients undergoing MIS vs laparotomy.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM A: Patients undergo MIS within 6 weeks after last cycle of standard of care neoadjuvant chemotherapy. If during MIS the surgeon thinks complete gross resection can only be accomplished by performing an open procedure, patients may undergo laparotomy instead. Within 6 weeks after surgery, patients receive standard of care chemotherapy.

ARM B: Patients undergo laparotomy within 6 weeks after last cycle of standard of care neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Within 6 weeks after surgery, patients receive standard of care chemotherapy.

After completion of study, patients are followed up within 6 weeks of completing post-surgery chemotherapy, then every 3 months for the first 2 years, and then every 6 months for 3 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

580

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • Recruiting
        • University of Miami Miller School of Medicine-Sylvester Cancer Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Abdulrahman Sinno, MD
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Recruiting
        • NYP/Columbia University Medical Center/Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alexander Melamed, MD
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Recruiting
        • Duke
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Leah McNally, MD
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jose A. Rauh-Hain
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77026
        • Recruiting
        • Lyndon Baines Johnson General
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jose Rauh-Hain, MD
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53792
        • Recruiting
        • University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lisa Barroilhet, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Stage IIIC or IV, high-grade (serous, endometrioid, clear-cell, transitional carcinomas), invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma, primary peritoneal carcinoma, or fallopian-tube carcinoma or pathology consistent with high-grade mullerian carcinoma.
  • Patient is considered by treating physician to be a surgical candidate after completion of 3 to 4 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy, or an investigational neoadjuvant regimen given according to protocol, with complete radiologic resolution of any disease outside the abdominal cavity. Pleural effusions are acceptable per the local PI's discretion.
  • Normalization of CA-125 according to individual participating center reference range (Note: Among patients with a normal CA-125 at initiation of therapy, the CA-125 cannot exceed 35 U/mL at the completion of NACT prior to interval debulking surgery.) or has a CA-125 value ≤500 and is scheduled to undergo a diagnostic laparoscopy prior to debulking surgery. a. For patients undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy, surgeon considers that optimal debulking is feasible either by MIS or laparotomy.
  • Timeframe of < 6 weeks (42 days) from the last cycle of NACT to interval debulking surgery. Overall timeframe may be extended per MD Anderson PI discretion.
  • ECOG performance status 0-2
  • Signed informed consent and ability to comply with follow-up
  • Negative pregnancy test by blood or urine (within 14 days prior to surgery)
  • Disease free of other active malignancies in the previous five years, except basal and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of tumor not amenable to minimally invasive resection on pre-operative imaging (CT, PET-CT, or MRI) including but not limited to the following findings that may preclude minimally invasive resection per surgeon's assessment. • Failure of improvement of ascites during NACT (trace ascites is allowed) • Small bowel or gastric tumor involvement • Colon or rectal tumor involvement • Diaphragmatic tumor involvement • Splenic or hepatic surface or parenchymal tumor involvement • Mesenteric tumor involvement • Tumor infiltration of the lesser peritoneal sac
  • History of psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially preventing compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule
  • Inability to tolerate prolonged Trendelenburg position or pneumoperitoneum as deemed by participating institution's clinicians
  • Any other contraindication to MIS as assessed by the clinician

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm A (MIS, standard of care chemotherapy)
Patients undergo MIS within 6 weeks after last cycle of standard of care neoadjuvant chemotherapy. If during MIS the surgeon thinks complete gross resection can only be accomplished by performing an open procedure, patients may undergo laparotomy instead. Within 6 weeks after surgery, patients receive standard of care chemotherapy.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Receive standard of care chemotherapy
Other Names:
  • Chemo
  • Chemotherapy (NOS)
  • Chemotherapy, Cancer, General
Undergo MIS
Other Names:
  • Minimally-Invasive Surgery
Active Comparator: Arm B (laparotomy, standard of care chemotherapy)
Patients undergo laparotomy within 6 weeks after last cycle of standard of care neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Within 6 weeks after surgery, patients receive standard of care chemotherapy.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Undergo laparotomy
Receive standard of care chemotherapy
Other Names:
  • Chemo
  • Chemotherapy (NOS)
  • Chemotherapy, Cancer, General

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease free survival (DFS)
Time Frame: Between randomization and physical or radiographic evidence of recurrence (local/distant) or death (all causes), assessed up to 5 years
Kaplan Meier curves will be used to describe DFS over time. Log-rank test will be used to compare DFS between the control and experimental arms. The treatment effects will be summarized by means of a hazard ratio with its associated 95% confidence interval. Two years DFS rate will be computed with a targeted 95% confidence interval (CI).
Between randomization and physical or radiographic evidence of recurrence (local/distant) or death (all causes), assessed up to 5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health related-quality of life (HR-QoL)
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post surgery chemotherapy
HR-QoL of patients will be assessed with European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC Scale 1-Not at all, 2-A little bit, 3-Quite a bit, 4-Very Much)
Up to 1 year post surgery chemotherapy
Health related-quality of life (HR-QoL)
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post surgery chemotherapy
HR-QoL of patients will be assessed Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQC30 scale 1-Not at all, 2-A little bit, 3-Quite a bit, 4-Very Much)
Up to 1 year post surgery chemotherapy
Health related-quality of life (HR-QoL)
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post surgery chemotherapy
HR-QoL of patients will be assessed with QLQ-Ovarian Cancer Module (OV28 Scale 1- Not at all, 2- A little bit, 3-Quite a bit, 4-Very Much).) (ovarian supplement)
Up to 1 year post surgery chemotherapy
Health related-quality of life (HR-QoL)
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post surgery chemotherapy
HR-QoL of patients will be assessed with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General short-form (FACT-G7 Scale 1- Not at all, 2- A little bit, 3-Quite a bit, 4-Very Much).
Up to 1 year post surgery chemotherapy
Optimal cytoreduction
Time Frame: At the end of surgery
Defined as residual tumor nodules each measuring 1 cm or less in maximum diameter.
At the end of surgery
Complete cytoreduction
Time Frame: At the end of surgery
Defined as no evidence of macroscopic disease.
At the end of surgery
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: Between randomization and death (all causes), assessed up to 5 years
Overall survival will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and will be described using the median with its 95% CI. Univariate Cox proportional hazards model (i.e., logrank test) will be used to estimate hazard ratios (HR: control arm versus investigational arm) with a 95% CI. When appropriate, multivariate Cox analyses will be performed, in which a univariate selection procedure will serve to identify eligible explanatory variables with univariate Cox (using Wald test) p-value lower than 0.10 as potential prognostic value. Follow-up will be estimated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method, and will be described using the median with its 95% CI.
Between randomization and death (all causes), assessed up to 5 years
Surgical morbidity
Time Frame: Up to 6 months post surgery
Rates of surgical complications according to Surgical morbidity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] version [v] 5.0 & Clavien Dindo classification and mortality (30-day post-operative for adverse events and up to 6 months post-operative for adverse events of interest).
Up to 6 months post surgery
Mortality
Time Frame: Up to 6 months post surgery
Mortality rates (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] version [v] 5.0 & Clavien Dindo classification and mortality (30-day post-operative for adverse events and up to 6 months post-operative for adverse events of interest).
Up to 6 months post surgery
Intraoperative injuries
Time Frame: During surgery
Coded as yes or no and categorized as involving the bowel, veins, arteries, ureter, bladder, or other site.
During surgery
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) converted to laparotomy
Time Frame: During surgery
Prospectively completed forms documented reasons for conversion of MIS to laparotomy.
During surgery
Cost of the procedure
Time Frame: Up to 6 months post surgery
A cost analysis may be performed in some countries.
Up to 6 months post surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jose A Rauh-Hain, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 5, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ovarian Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma

Clinical Trials on Quality-of-Life Assessment

3
Subscribe