- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04614844
COVID-19 Responsive Intervention: Systems Improvement Simulations (CRI:SIS)
COVID-19 Responsive Intervention: Systems Improvement Simulations (CRI:SIS) Randomized Control Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The overall goal of this study is to develop and test the COVID-19 Responsive Intervention: Systems Improvement Simulations (CRI:SIS), a simulation-based training and quality improvement intervention that will minimize physician stress and improve system responsiveness. To accomplish this goal, the investigators will conduct a two-site randomized clinical trial to test the efficacy of CRI:SIS as a simulation-based preparedness intervention on decreasing emergency physician stress and anxiety during the care of COVID-19 patients in the ED through on-shift measurements of heart rate variability as a physiologic marker of stress and responses to the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory post-shift. The investigators will rapidly disseminate CRI:SIS as two simulation interventions, one on clinician preparedness and the other on system improvement, through interactive virtual tele-simulations, webinars, and virtual workshops providing mentorship and shared learning for other institutions facing similar challenges. If proven successful, the simulation-based CRI:SIS intervention to rapidly prepare clinicians and improve system responsiveness can be widely disseminated to other institutions to combat the anticipated lengthy response to COVID-19 safety challenges.
Participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive CRI:SIS as a three-hour simulation session. This session will include three scenarios focused on three critical areas of COVID-19 patient care:
- airway management procedures in patients with COVID-19 given increased risk of viral transmission to personnel and rapid respiratory deterioration in infected patients
- new presenting symptoms and associated complications of COVID-19 (e.g., hypercoagulability, cardiovascular morbidity), making accurate diagnosis and treatment of patients with suspected infection difficult
- caring for patients presenting with severe illness and poor prognosis adding emotional and cognitive strain to physicians as they initiate palliative care, discuss goals of care, or withdraw care in the ED.
In addition, all three scenarios will address negative effects on team performance during COVID-19 care from social distancing and personal protective equipment (PPE) requirements through interactions with nursing and ancillary staff confederates during each scenario. Each participant will complete all three scenarios within a three-hour block between one to five days prior to a clinical shift.
Participants randomized to the control arm will participate in four shift data collections, with no additional intervention. These participants will have access to the routinely distributed COVID-19 Task Force updates, guidelines, weekly town hall meetings, and any in-service support that would routinely be available to all clinical staff as per standard operational practice in our local departments. Once enrollment for Aim 2 is complete, all participants randomized to the control arm will be offered the opportunity to complete the simulation intervention.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Connecticut
-
New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06512
- Yale New Haven Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Resident or Attending Physician working at Yale New Haven Hospital York Street or Saint Raphael Emergency Departments
- Currently treating patients with COVID-19 or suspected COVID-19
Exclusion Criteria:
- Currently taking a beta-blocker and/or anti-arrhythmic medication
- Active (uncontrolled) thyroid dysfunction
- Pregnant
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Simulation Intervention
Participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive CRI:SIS as a three-hour simulation session.
|
Participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive CRI:SIS as a three-hour simulation session.
|
Active Comparator: Control
Participants randomized to the control arm will participate in four shift data collections, with no additional intervention.
|
Participants randomized to the control arm will participate in four shift data collections, with no additional intervention.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in end-of-shift heart rate variability
Time Frame: Baseline, 5 minutes post-intervention shift
|
The change in physician end-of-shift heart rate variability will be measured using the Hexoskin Smart Shirt. Changes in HRV will be averaged over the two post-intervention shift data collections to control for an anticipated shift-to-shift and patient-to-patient variability in stress response due to patient acuity and workload |
Baseline, 5 minutes post-intervention shift
|
Change in STAI S-Anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline, 5 minutes post-intervention shift
|
The change in physician end-of-shift anxiety measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for physicians exposed to the simulation based training preparation compared to standard guideline update delivery.
Each STAI item is given a weighted score of 1 to 4. A rating of 4 indicates the presence of a high level of anxiety for items (e.g., "I feel frightened," "I feel upset").
To obtain scores for the S-Anxiety, simply add the weighted scores for the twenty items that make up the scale, taking into account the fact that the scores are reversed for specific items.
Scores for the S-Anxiety scale can vary from a minimum of 20 to a maximum of 80.
|
Baseline, 5 minutes post-intervention shift
|
Change in STAI T-Anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week
|
The secondary outcome of interest is change in anxiety between the intervention and control conditions as measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).
The T-Anxiety scale (STAI Form Y-2) consists of twenty statements that assess how people generally feel.
The scoring weights for the anxiety-present items are the same as the chosen numbers on the print inventory form.
To obtain scores for the T-Anxiety scale, simply add the weighted scores for the twenty items that make up the scale, taking into account the fact that the scores are reversed for specific items.
Scores for the T- Anxiety scales can vary from a minimum of 20 to a maximum of 80.
|
Baseline, 1 week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Leigh Evans, MD, Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine; Executive Director, Yale Center for Medical Simulation; Director, Resident Research
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2000029372
- 1R01HS028340-01 (U.S. AHRQ Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Physician Stress Levels
-
Parkland Health and Hospital SystemCompletedStress LevelsUnited States
-
NestléCompletedMild to Moderate Levels of StressSwitzerland
-
The Cleveland ClinicAccreditation Council for Graduate Medical EducationCompletedBurnout, Professional | Physician Patient RelationUnited States
-
Dr cliff LibrachCompleted
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedPhysician Well-being | Physician Job SatisfactionUnited States
-
National University Hospital, SingaporeSingapore General HospitalCompletedCataract Surgery | Stress Levels | Music Improving Outcomes in Cataract SurgerySingapore
-
University of FloridaCompletedQuality/Accuracy of Physician Documentation | Efficiency of Physician DocumentationUnited States
-
University Health Network, TorontoQueen's UniversityNot yet recruitingAntithrombin III Levels | Albumin LevelsCanada
-
Yale UniversityNot yet recruitingBurn Out | Student Burnout | Physician Assistant Student BurnoutUnited States
-
Emory UniversityWithdrawnPhysician WorkflowUnited States
Clinical Trials on Simulation Intervention
-
University of AarhusCentral Denmark RegionActive, not recruitingMedical Education | Pediatrics | Patient OutcomesDenmark
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityRecruitingAutism Spectrum DisorderUnited States
-
Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiRecruiting
-
University of BrasiliaUnknownCompliance Behavior
-
Stanford UniversityCompletedWork-Related ConditionUnited States
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRecruitingAirway Management | Virtual Reality | Education, Medical | Trauma Centers | Students, Medical | ManikinsCanada
-
University of Massachusetts, BostonCompletedNurse's Role | Simulation of Physical IllnessUnited States
-
University of BrasiliaUnknownStress | Learning Process in Nursing Graduation