- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04690946
Comparing Effect and Change Processes in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Emotion-Focused Therapy for Depression
Randomized Controlled Study Comparing the Therapeutic Effect and Change Processes in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Emotion-Focused Therapy for Depression
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Depression is a widespread mental disorder which can result in severe impairment and reduced quality of life for those affected. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is the approach with strongest empirical support, and is often recommended as treatment for depression, as in the NICE Guidelines for Depression from 2009. However, research indicates that not all patients respond to CBT, indicating a need to expand the range of available evidence-based psychotherapies, and mapping the mechanisms of change in existing treatments.
Emotion focused therapy (EFT) is one promising treatment for depression with empirical support for its efficacy. A previous study found equal outcome in CBT and Process-Experiential treatment/EFT for depression, but more studies are needed to replicate these findings across cultural contexts. The main aim of this study is to investigate whether there are significant differences in the therapeutic effect of EFT compared to that of CBT for patients with moderate and major depressive disorder in a Norwegian outpatient setting.
Although several psychotherapeutic approaches have shown efficacy in the treatment of depression, no psychotherapeutic interventions is beneficial for all patients. There is a need for research that investigates what treatments works for whom, based on patient characteristics and preferences. The present study will investigate whether patient characteristics moderate treatment outcome, both within and between treatment conditions. In addition, qualitative interviews will be conducted to get a deeper understanding of what clients find helpful and challenging within the CBT and EFT condition, and to explore the experience of patients who drop-out of the treatment process.
In order to further develop psychotherapeutic treatments and increase their effectiveness, there is a need to identify processes that are related to good and poor outcome. Process-outcome studies are commonly used for this purpose. The present study will investigate and compare characteristics of psychotherapy processes in both the CBT and EFT conditions and how these are related to outcome.
Study design and Method
The study will be conducted as a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in order to compare the efficacy of EFT to CBT. RCT's are considered the gold standard for efficacy studies. Participants will be recruited from the Norwegian mental health program "Return to work", a publicly funded treatment program where patients with common mental health issues receives outpatient psychotherapeutic treatment to reduce and prevent sick leave.
The present study will address the following research hypothesis and questions:
- EFT and CBT will not result in significantly different outcome in the treatment of patients with moderate and major depressive disorder.
- Patient characteristics (severity of depression, adverse childhood experiences and clients' initial ability to make sense of their experience) will moderate treatment outcome for both conditions.
- Will therapeutic processes (therapeutic alliance, therapist empathy, clients' ability to make sense of their experience and emotional processing) mediate treatment outcome equally for both conditions?
- What do patients in both conditions describe as helpful and unhelpful aspects of treatment?
- How do patients in both conditions describe their own change or lack or change after treatment?
- How do patients that choose to drop out of treatment describe the processes leading to that decision?
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Jan R Stiegler, PhD
- Phone Number: +4792211019
- Email: stiegler@ipr.no
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Hanna Aardal, Cand Psychol
- Phone Number: +4795287217
- Email: aardal@ipr.no
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bergen, Norway, 5012
- Institutt for Psykologisk rådgivning
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Moderate or major depressive episode as primary diagnosis
Exclusion Criteria:
- Serious mental illness (schizophrenia, severe bipolar disorder, recent or current psychotic episode) or intellectual disability.
- Severe alcohol or drug abuse, last 12 months.
- Suicidality last 6 months
- Severe medical issues
- If the participant is on antidepressive medication, the dosage must have been stable for more than 4 weeks, and the participant must consent to staying on the same dosage for the duration of the treatment.
- The participant is currently in another treatment for depression
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
14-18 sessions of psychotherapy according to principles of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
|
14-18 sessions of CBT
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Emotion-Focused Therapy
14-18 sessions of psychotherapy according to principles of Emotion Focused Therapy
|
14-18 sessions of EFT
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Beck Depression Inventory from session to session
Time Frame: 1 week before treatment startup, 1 day after each therapy session, within 1 week after treatment, 3 month follow up, 6 month follow up, 12 months follow up
|
Self-report measure of depressive symptoms, ranging from minimum 0 and maximum 63.
Higher scores suggests worse outcome.
|
1 week before treatment startup, 1 day after each therapy session, within 1 week after treatment, 3 month follow up, 6 month follow up, 12 months follow up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Beck Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: 1 week before treatment startup, within 1 week after treatment, 3 month follow up, 6 month follow up, 12 months follow up
|
Self-report measure of anxiety symptoms, ranging from minimum 0 and maximum 63.
Higher scores suggests worse outcome.
|
1 week before treatment startup, within 1 week after treatment, 3 month follow up, 6 month follow up, 12 months follow up
|
Change in Repetitive Eating Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 week before treatment startup, within 1 week after treatment, 3 month follow up, 6 month follow up, 12 months follow up
|
Self-report measure of symptoms related to eating disorders, average scores, minimum 0, maximum 6, higher score indicates worse outcome.
|
1 week before treatment startup, within 1 week after treatment, 3 month follow up, 6 month follow up, 12 months follow up
|
Change in Inventory of Interpersonal problems
Time Frame: 1 week before treatment startup, within 1 week after treatment, 3 month follow up, 6 month follow up, 12 months follow up
|
Self-report measure of interpersonal difficulties, average scores minimum 0, maximum 4. Higher score suggests worse outcome.
|
1 week before treatment startup, within 1 week after treatment, 3 month follow up, 6 month follow up, 12 months follow up
|
Change in The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire from session to session
Time Frame: 1 week before treatment startup, 1 day after each therapy session, within 1 week after treatment, 3 month follow up, 6 month follow up, 12 months follow up
|
Self-report measure of psychological flexibility, average scores minimum 1, maximum 7. Higher score suggests worse outcome.
|
1 week before treatment startup, 1 day after each therapy session, within 1 week after treatment, 3 month follow up, 6 month follow up, 12 months follow up
|
Change in Emotion Approach Coping Scale
Time Frame: 1 week before treatment startup, within 1 week after treatment, 3 month follow up, 6 month follow up, 12 months follow up
|
Self-report measure of emotional processing ability, average scores minimum 1, maximum 4. Higher score suggests better outcome.
|
1 week before treatment startup, within 1 week after treatment, 3 month follow up, 6 month follow up, 12 months follow up
|
Change in Penn State Worry Questionaire
Time Frame: 1 week before treatment startup, within 1 week after treatment, 3 month follow up, 6 month follow up, 12 months follow up
|
Self-report measure of rumination and cognitive processing, total scores minimum 16, maximum 80. Higher score suggests worse outcome.
|
1 week before treatment startup, within 1 week after treatment, 3 month follow up, 6 month follow up, 12 months follow up
|
Change in Self-Compassion Scale
Time Frame: 1 week before treatment startup, within 1 week after treatment, 3 month follow up, 6 month follow up, 12 months follow up
|
Self-report measure of self-relating, average scores, minimum 1, maximum 5, higher scores suggests better outcome.
|
1 week before treatment startup, within 1 week after treatment, 3 month follow up, 6 month follow up, 12 months follow up
|
Change in Quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 week before treatment startup, within 1 week after treatment, 3 month follow up, 6 month follow up, 12 months follow up
|
Self-report measure of quality of life, average scores, minimum 1, maximum 5, higher scores indicate better outcome.
|
1 week before treatment startup, within 1 week after treatment, 3 month follow up, 6 month follow up, 12 months follow up
|
Change in Working Alliance Inventory - short version
Time Frame: 1 day after 1st through 14th therapy session.
|
Self report measure on experience of therapeutic alliance, average scores, minimum 1, maximum 7, higher scores suggests better outcome.
|
1 day after 1st through 14th therapy session.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jan Reidar Stiegler, PhD, Institute for Psychological Counselling
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kazdin AE. Understanding how and why psychotherapy leads to change. Psychother Res. 2009 Jul;19(4-5):418-28. doi: 10.1080/10503300802448899.
- Dimidjian S, Hollon SD. How would we know if psychotherapy were harmful? Am Psychol. 2010 Jan;65(1):21-33. doi: 10.1037/a0017299.
- Blatt SJ, Luyten P. A structural-developmental psychodynamic approach to psychopathology: two polarities of experience across the life span. Dev Psychopathol. 2009 Summer;21(3):793-814. doi: 10.1017/S0954579409000431.
- Goldman, R. N., Greenberg, L. S., & Angus, L. (2006). The effects of adding emotion-focused interventions to the client-centered relationship conditions in the treatment of depression. Psychotherapy Research, 16(5), 537-549.
- Greenberg, L & Watson, J. (1998). Experiential Therapy of Depression: Differential Effects of ClientCentered Relationship Conditions and Process Experiential Interventions, Psychotherapy Research, 8:2, 210-224.
- Kazdin AE. Evidence-based treatment research: Advances, limitations, and next steps. Am Psychol. 2011 Nov;66(8):685-698. doi: 10.1037/a0024975.
- Kendall JM. Designing a research project: randomised controlled trials and their principles. Emerg Med J. 2003 Mar;20(2):164-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.2.164. No abstract available.
- Lambert, M. J. (2011). What have we learned about treatment failure in empirically supported treatments? Some suggestions for practice. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 18(3), 413-420.
- What have we learned about treatment failure in empirically supported treatments
- Depression: Evidence Update April 2012: A summary of selected new evidence relevant to NICE clinical guideline 90 'The treatment and management of depression in adults' (2009) [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE); 2012. No abstract available. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK552056/
- Nilsson, T., Svensson, M., Sandell, R. & Clinton, D. (2007). Patients' experiences of change in cognitive-behavioral therapy and psychodynamic therapy: a qualitative comparative study. Psychotherapy Research, 17:5, 553-566.
- Rice, L. N., & Greenberg, L. S. (Eds.). (1984). Patterns of change: Intensive analysis of psychotherapy process. Guilford Press.
- Roth, A & Fonagy, P (1996) What works for whom? New York: Guilford Press
- Elliott R. Psychotherapy change process research: realizing the promise. Psychother Res. 2010 Mar;20(2):123-35. doi: 10.1080/10503300903470743.
- Watson JC, Gordon LB, Stermac L, Kalogerakos F, Steckley P. Comparing the effectiveness of process-experiential with cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy in the treatment of depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Aug;71(4):773-81. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.71.4.773.
- Watson JC. Mapping patterns of change in emotion-focused psychotherapy: Implications for theory, research, practice, and training. Psychother Res. 2018 May;28(3):389-405. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2018.1435920. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IPR
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Depression
-
ProgenaBiomeRecruitingDepression | Depression, Postpartum | Depression, Anxiety | Depression Moderate | Depression Severe | Clinical Depression | Depression in Remission | Depression, Endogenous | Depression ChronicUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompletedTreatment Resistant Depression | Late Life Depression | Geriatric Depression | Refractory Depression | Therapy-Resistant DepressionUnited States, Canada
-
Kintsugi Mindful Wellness, Inc.Sonar Strategies; Vituity PsychiatryRecruitingDepression | Depression Moderate | Depression Severe | Depression MildUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoRecruitingDepression Moderate | Depression Mild | Depression, TeenUnited States
-
University GhentUniversiteit Antwerpen; Janssen-Cilag Ltd.RecruitingDepression Moderate | Depression Severe | Depression MildBelgium
-
Baylor College of MedicineUniversity of TexasRecruitingDepression | Depression Moderate | Depression Severe | Suicide and Self-harm | Depression in Adolescence | Depression MildUnited States
-
University of Cape TownNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedPostpartum Depression | Clinical Depression | Moderate DepressionSouth Africa
-
Washington University School of MedicinePatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; National Institute of Mental...CompletedMajor Depressive Disorder | Treatment Resistant Depression | Treatment-Refractory Depression | Late Life Depression | Geriatric DepressionUnited States, Canada
-
Northern Illinois UniversityUniversity Autonoma de Santo DomingoTerminatedDepression Moderate | Depression MildUnited States, Dominican Republic
-
Gerbera Therapeutics, Inc.Not yet recruitingPostpartum Depression | Depression, Postpartum | Postnatal Depression | Post-partum Depression | Post-Natal DepressionUnited States
Clinical Trials on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
-
Eleos HealthMissouri Department of Mental HealthCompletedMood Disorders | Anxiety DisordersUnited States
-
Regionsenter for barn og unges psykiske helseThe Research Council of NorwayCompletedGeneralized Anxiety Disorder | Social Phobia | Separation Anxiety DisorderNorway
-
Claremont McKenna CollegeUniversity of California, Los AngelesCompleted
-
University of South FloridaObsessive Compulsive FoundationCompletedObsessive Compulsive Disorder | Stepped Care Cognitive Behavioral TherapyUnited States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
University of RochesterNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)CompletedDepression | Sleep | Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticUnited States
-
University of PittsburghWithdrawnPsychosis | Prodromal Symptoms | Prodromal Stage | Prodromal StatesUnited States
-
Duke UniversityCompleted
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center at...59th Medical Wing; Brooke Army Medical Center; South Texas Veterans Health Care...CompletedCombat Disorders | Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders | Stress DisordersUnited States
-
University of PittsburghCompletedDepression | Anxiety | Sickle Cell DiseaseUnited States