- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04709042
Acquisition of Objective Data During Transapical Neochordae Implantation (TENSCHORD)
Mitral Valve repair (MVr) is the gold standard treatment for primary Mitral Regurgitation. Implantation of artificial Gore-Tex chordae (or neochordae implantation) is often used for MVr.
The NeoChord DS1000 (NeoChord Inc., Minneapolis, USA) is a device designed to deploy neochordae through transapical access in a beating heart and without cardiopulmonary bypass. NeoChord System is CE marked and therefore authorized for use in Europe. Procedure is conducted under 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance. The device is introduced through the apex of the left ventricular (LV) and the prolapsed leaflet is grabbed and harpooned.
The neochordae are thus stretched between the valve and the LV apex. Neochordae length can be precisely adapted to restore a normal coaptation, to treat the regurgitation.
Recently, the principal investigator's teams (heart surgery department at Hospices Civils de Lyon and Laboratoire de Génie Electrique et Ferromagnétique lab at Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA) de Lyon, France) created a platform allowing the measurement of the tension applied on neochordae during a NeoChord procedure. A dedicated protocol was designed and approved by the ethical committee of the French Society of Cardiology. The measurement was performed in 7 patients. This preliminary study shows that the technic is safe. It also suggests that chordal tension might be correlated to the quality of MVr: the sub-valvular apparatus appears to be in a low stress state when the structure and the function of the valve are restored.
These first findings raise new questions:
- The mechanism involved in the changes in tensions during chordal length adjustment cannot be understood with current standard medical imaging tools. Numerical simulation technologies could bring physical data in order to approach physical phenomenon underlying these findings.
- Novel chordal tension measurement tools could lead to a change in current paradigm enabling a MVr based on objective data measurement, instead of sole morphological analysis. Prognostic value of chordal tension must be studied through a larger clinical study and a systematic protocol.
A large consortium involving physicians and scientists has been created to address those questions, and a large national funding has been raised to fulfil our objectives over a 4 years period (SIMR project). The present clinical study is the core of this large project.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults (≥ 18 years old)
Patient candidate for NeoChord procedure after validation by the local Heart-Team
- severe symptomatic MR due to a posterior prolapses, involving mainly the P2 segment (with a variable extension on P1 or P3, but never involving the commissures or the anterior leaflet). Also, a LAI (leaflet to annulus index) >1,25 will be required.
- and considered as high-risk for conventional surgery (mainly because of frailty) after selection by our heart team.
- Patient who has provided his written informed consent to participate in the study
- Patient affiliated to a social health insurance.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient with contraindication for NeoChord technic including:
- Patient with secondary MR
- LV dilatation with initial tethering
- Central component to regurgitant jet
- Calcified leaflets segments.
Patient with contraindication for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) imaging:
- Patients without sinus rhythm
- Regular MRI contraindications (e.g. a pacemaker, defibrillator or metallic (ferromagnetic) body, a known allergy to gadolinium)
- Contraindication for Gadolinium infusion : glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 ml / min
- Patient unable to understand the purpose of the study
- Patient participating in another trial that would interfere with this study
- Female patient who is pregnant or lactating
- Patients under judicial protection
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Chordal tension measurement and cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
All patient candidates for NeoChord implantation according to the standard of care will be considered for inclusion in this clinical study.
Chordal tension measurement will be performed during Neochord implantation.
Moreover, all patients will undergo cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) exam before the surgery, as well as at 3 months follow-up.
|
The chordal tension measurement will be performed during surgery.
The neochordae are connected to the measuring device through "crocodile" clips (e.g.
machine-patient interface).We start to apply traction on the chordae that is in the center of the flailing area thanks to a millimeter screw and under TEE control.
After obtaining a stable tension (plateau value), the other chordae are then tracked, one at a time, with an individual screw.
When we achieve an equivalent tension on all chordae, a traction on all chordae is applied thanks to the principal screw under TEE control until obtaining a perfect coaptation.
When the correction is optimal (good echocardiographic result, chordal tension low and equally spread on each chordae), the measurements are then stopped, and the chordae are fixed at the apex of the left ventricle at the optimal length.
Patients will undergo 2 MRI exams: 1 MRI before surgical intervention (maximum 21 days before) and 1 MRI three months after surgery (+/- 14 days), with intravenous administration of gadolinium.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Correlate intraoperative chordal tension and postoperative echocardiographic mitral valve repair success (defined as mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤2+)
Time Frame: Day 0
|
Correlation between intraoperative chordal tension (measured in mmHg) and postoperative echocardiographic mitral valve repair success (defined as mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤2+)
|
Day 0
|
Correlate intraoperative chordal tension and postoperative echocardiographic mitral valve repair success (defined as mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤2+)
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
|
Correlation between intraoperative chordal tension (measured in mmHg) and postoperative echocardiographic mitral valve repair success (defined as mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤2+)
|
1 month after surgery
|
Correlate intraoperative chordal tension and postoperative echocardiographic mitral valve repair success (defined as mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤2+)
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery
|
Correlation between intraoperative chordal tension (measured in mmHg) and postoperative echocardiographic mitral valve repair success (defined as mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤2+)
|
12 months after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Duration of procedure in minutes
Time Frame: Day 0
|
Intraoperative safety is assessed by procedure duration in minutes (defined as skin incision to skin closure)
|
Day 0
|
Number of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Post-operative safety is assessed by occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) at each of the follow-up times
|
12 months
|
Duration of hospitalization
Time Frame: From the end of surgery (Day 0) to discharge from hospital (Day 15)
|
Post-operative safety is assessed by duration of hospitalization
|
From the end of surgery (Day 0) to discharge from hospital (Day 15)
|
Number of patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) > 2+
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
|
Mitral regurgitation is assessed by echocardiographic exam
|
1 month after surgery
|
Number of patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) > 2+
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery
|
Mitral regurgitation is assessed by echocardiographic exam
|
12 months after surgery
|
Number of rehospitalization for heart failure and mitral valve reoperation
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
|
Freedom from rehospitalization for heart failure and Mitral valve reoperation free survival
|
1 month after surgery
|
Number of rehospitalization for heart failure and mitral valve reoperation
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery
|
Freedom from rehospitalization for heart failure and Mitral valve reoperation free survival
|
3 months after surgery
|
Number of rehospitalization for heart failure and mitral valve reoperation
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery
|
Freedom from rehospitalization for heart failure and Mitral valve reoperation free survival
|
12 months after surgery
|
New York Heart Association (NYHA) score
Time Frame: Inclusion
|
Change in functional evaluation is assessed by NYHA functional classification of heart failure.
It is based on symptom severity and the amount of exertion needed to provoke symptoms.
NYHA heart failure classes are as follows : Class I No limitation of physical activity, Class II Slight limitation of physical activity, in which ordinary physical activity leads to fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest, Class III Marked limitation of physical activity, in which less-than-ordinary activity results in fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest and Class IV Inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort but also symptoms of heart failure at rest, with increased discomfort if any physical activity is undertaken.
|
Inclusion
|
New York Heart Association (NYHA) score
Time Frame: Discharge from hospital (Day 15)
|
Change in functional evaluation is assessed by NYHA functional classification of heart failure.
It is based on symptom severity and the amount of exertion needed to provoke symptoms.
NYHA heart failure classes are as follows : Class I No limitation of physical activity, Class II Slight limitation of physical activity, in which ordinary physical activity leads to fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest, Class III Marked limitation of physical activity, in which less-than-ordinary activity results in fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest and Class IV Inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort but also symptoms of heart failure at rest, with increased discomfort if any physical activity is undertaken.
|
Discharge from hospital (Day 15)
|
New York Heart Association (NYHA) score
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
|
Change in functional evaluation is assessed by NYHA functional classification of heart failure.
It is based on symptom severity and the amount of exertion needed to provoke symptoms.
NYHA heart failure classes are as follows : Class I No limitation of physical activity, Class II Slight limitation of physical activity, in which ordinary physical activity leads to fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest, Class III Marked limitation of physical activity, in which less-than-ordinary activity results in fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest and Class IV Inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort but also symptoms of heart failure at rest, with increased discomfort if any physical activity is undertaken.
|
1 month after surgery
|
New York Heart Association (NYHA) score
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery
|
Change in functional evaluation is assessed by NYHA functional classification of heart failure.
It is based on symptom severity and the amount of exertion needed to provoke symptoms.
NYHA heart failure classes are as follows : Class I No limitation of physical activity, Class II Slight limitation of physical activity, in which ordinary physical activity leads to fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest, Class III Marked limitation of physical activity, in which less-than-ordinary activity results in fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest and Class IV Inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort but also symptoms of heart failure at rest, with increased discomfort if any physical activity is undertaken.
|
3 months after surgery
|
New York Heart Association (NYHA) score
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery
|
Change in functional evaluation is assessed by NYHA functional classification of heart failure.
It is based on symptom severity and the amount of exertion needed to provoke symptoms.
NYHA heart failure classes are as follows : Class I No limitation of physical activity, Class II Slight limitation of physical activity, in which ordinary physical activity leads to fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest, Class III Marked limitation of physical activity, in which less-than-ordinary activity results in fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea; the person is comfortable at rest and Class IV Inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort but also symptoms of heart failure at rest, with increased discomfort if any physical activity is undertaken.
|
12 months after surgery
|
The 3-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) health status score (quality of life score)
Time Frame: Inclusion
|
The EQ-5D-3L consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems.
The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions.
This decision results into a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension.
The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.
The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'.
The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
|
Inclusion
|
The 3-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) health status score (quality of life score)
Time Frame: Discharge from hospital (Day 15)
|
The EQ-5D-3L consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems.
The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions.
This decision results into a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension.
The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.
The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'.
The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
|
Discharge from hospital (Day 15)
|
The 3-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) health status score (quality of life score)
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
|
The EQ-5D-3L consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems.
The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions.
This decision results into a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension.
The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.
The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'.
The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
|
1 month after surgery
|
The 3-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) health status score (quality of life score)
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery
|
The EQ-5D-3L consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems.
The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions.
This decision results into a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension.
The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.
The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'.
The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
|
3 months after surgery
|
The 3-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) health status score (quality of life score)
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery
|
The EQ-5D-3L consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems.
The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions.
This decision results into a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension.
The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.
The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'.
The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
|
12 months after surgery
|
Left ventricular volumes and function quantification
Time Frame: Inclusion
|
Left ventricular volumes and function quantification are assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
|
Inclusion
|
Left ventricular volumes and function quantification
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery
|
Left ventricular volumes and function quantification are assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
|
3 months after surgery
|
Number of left ventricular tissue fibrosis
Time Frame: Inclusion
|
Left ventricular tissue fibrosis are assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
|
Inclusion
|
Number of left ventricular tissue fibrosis
Time Frame: 3 months after surgery
|
Left ventricular tissue fibrosis are assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
|
3 months after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Daniel GRINBERG, MD, Hôpital Pneumologique et Cardiovasculaire Louis Pradel
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 69HCL19_1034
- ID-RCB (Other Identifier: 2023-A01937-38)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mitral Regurgitation
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedFunctional Mitral Regurgitation | Degenerrative Mitral RegurgitationRussian Federation
-
Ancora Heart, Inc.CompletedMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Regurgitation | Functional Mitral RegurgitationAustria, Lithuania, Germany
-
Heinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfCompletedMitral Regurgitation | Functional Mitral Regurgitation | Degenerative Mitral Valve RegurgitationGermany
-
Mitre Medical Corp.BSWRI Cardiac Imaging Core Lab (CICL)Not yet recruitingIschemic Mitral Regurgitation | Functional Mitral RegurgitationUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedMitral Valve Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Incompetence | Mitral Insufficiency | Functional Mitral Regurgitation | Mitral Stenosis With InsufficiencyJapan
-
Hospital Clinic of BarcelonaAbbottUnknownMITRAL REGURGITATIONSpain
-
Boston Scientific CorporationActive, not recruitingCardiovascular Diseases | Mitral Regurgitation Functional | Mitral Valve DiseaseUnited States, Australia
-
Edwards LifesciencesRecruitingMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Insufficiency | Functional Mitral Regurgitation | Degenerative Mitral Valve DiseaseUnited States, Canada, Switzerland, Germany
-
Abbott Medical DevicesActive, not recruitingHeart Failure | Mitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Regurgitation | Treatment of Functional Mitral Regurgitation in Symptomatic Heart Failure SubjectsUnited States, Canada
-
Mardil MedicalRecruitingFunctional Mitral RegurgitationCanada, Hungary, France, Germany, Netherlands, Panama, Poland
Clinical Trials on Chordal tension measurement
-
Benjamin T. MillerRecruiting
-
The Cleveland ClinicRecruitingHernia, Abdominal | Hernia, Ventral | Hernia Abdominal WallUnited States
-
Edwards LifesciencesTerminatedMitral Leaflet ProlapseItaly
-
West Virginia UniversitySuspendedCutaneous Tumors | Skin CancersUnited States
-
Pipeline MedicalActive, not recruitingMitral Valve Regurgitation | Degenerative Mitral Valve DiseaseSerbia, Georgia, Paraguay
-
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman UniversityCompletedPRESSURE PAIN THRESHOLD | PAIN TOLERANCE | KINESIOTAPINGTurkey
-
Yale UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedInfertility | PregnancyUnited States
-
Hawaii Pacific HealthRecruitingInduction of Labor Affected Fetus / NewbornUnited States
-
McGill UniversityCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)UnknownSyncope, VasovagalCanada
-
Beijing Tongren HospitalNot yet recruitingGlaucoma | Angle-ClosureChina