Functional and MRI Evaluation of the Robot-assisted and Traditional Rehabilitation Programs on the Muscle

February 22, 2021 updated by: IRCCS Eugenio Medea

Functional and MRI Evaluation of the Robot-assisted and Traditional Rehabilitation Programs on the Muscle in Subjects With Acquired Brain Injury

Walk recovery is one of the goals of rehabilitation programs in patients with acquired brain injury.

Recent experiences have shown the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs including traditional physiotherapy in combination with robotic gait training systems (Lokomat).

In this context, MRI can be used to assess the treatment effects on the muscular tissue, providing useful clinical indications for the optimization of the rehabilitation programs on the basis of the damage extension and the muscle characteristics.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Acquired brain injuries can lead to permanent physical, cognitive and psycho-social deficits. One of the primary objectives of rehabilitation in these patients is to recover the ability to walk, which is usually feasible in most patients, even in those with severe brain injuries.

Recent experiences have shown that the use of rehabilitative programs that include traditional physiotherapy in combination with robotic walking training systems (robotic-aided gait training - RAGT, Lokomat) are effective in improving the performance of pediatric patients with acquired brain injuries. Thanks to the partial or total support of the patient's weight and the robotic guidance that facilitates a physiological gait pattern, these systems allow intensive and reproducible training which, by stimulating brain neuroplasticity, can increase the chances of recovery. Alterations of strength, coordination, balance associated with structural changes of muscular tissue (e.g. atrophy, fibrosis, adipose substitution) are frequent and may, on the other hand, compromise the effectiveness of rehabilitation treatments.

There are currently no literature data regarding local effects on muscle tissue of such treatments in the pediatric population; in particular, it has not yet been documented how the muscle responds to the robotic treatment and whether it is possible to identify local indices able to correlate with the degree of performance and improvement of each patient. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) can be a useful tool for in-vivo measurement of the effects of these treatments on muscle tissue and provide clinical indications for a better optimization of rehabilitative programs, based on the extent of damage and the characteristics of the muscle.

A complete evaluation of the effects of rehabilitative programs with RAGT, both in terms of mechanical-functional data (kinematics, muscular metabolism) and structural data through MRI, and the subsequent correlation of these parameters with clinical scales measuring motor skills, is not currently described in the literature. It could instead prove to be very useful both for prognostic purposes and for a better understanding of the local mechanisms of muscle tissue response to rehabilitative treatments, favoring an identification of the best rehabilitation plan targeted for each specific patient and thus increasing the chances of functional recovery.

The objectives of the study are:

  1. To characterize, in subjects with acquired cerebral lesions, the effects of intensive rehabilitative programs with RAGT, in terms of kinematics, activation and muscle metabolism;
  2. To document, in subjects with acquired cerebral lesions, the effects of intensive rehabilitative programs with RAGT on muscular structure through advanced and quantitative MRI methods;
  3. Correlate functional and muscle imaging data with clinical parameters related to patient's motor skills and with the type of treatment performed.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • LC
      • Bosisio Parini, LC, Italy, 23842
        • Recruiting
        • Scientific Institute IRCCS Eugenio Medea
        • Contact:
          • Denis Peruzzo, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 18 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population includes pediatric patients with acquired brain lesion occurred in the last 10 months prior the beginning of the treatment and showing deficit in the lower limbs movements due to the acquired lesion.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • acquired brain lesion occurred in the last 10 months prior the beginning of the treatment
  • hemi or tetraparesis diagnosis following the brain lesion
  • thigh-bone length > 21 cm
  • ability and willingness to follow instructions and communicate fear and pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe contractures, fractures, bone instability or osteoporosis of the lower limbs
  • skin lesions in the lower limbs
  • thromboembolic or cardiovascular pathologies
  • aggression and self-aggressive behavior
  • orthopedic surgery and/or botulinum toxin injection in the 6 months prior to enrollment
  • cognitive and/or motor deficits prior to the injury
  • contraindications to MRI examination

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Pediatric patients with acquired brain injury
Subjects with a acquired brain injury occurred in the last 10 months prior the beginning of the treatment

Conventional physiotherapy is performed in 10 weekly sessions (45 minutes each) over 4 weeks(total 40 sessions).

Specific exercises are administered to improve gait, balance and functional abilities focusing on:

strengthening the gluteus and quadriceps muscles stretching the hip flexor and hamstrings muscles increasing static balance increasing dynamic balance increasing functional abilities improving ground gait going up and down the stairs.

Physiotherapists can choose from a list of 25 standard exercises, according to some constraints:

  1. strengthening exercises had to involve all the lower limb joints (no segmental intervention)
  2. during each session, at least 4 out of the 7 categories above had to be delivered
  3. the impossibility to perform any of the categories above during any session had to be recorded in the patient's treatment diary.

Physiotherapists of the treatments group discuss patients' diaries during weekly meetings.

Other Names:
  • Conventional physiotherapy

The rehabilitation protocol consists of 20 sessions of robotic training alternated with 20 sessions of conventional physiotherapy (CP). Each treatment is performed in 5 weekly sessions (45 minutes each) over 4 weeks.

Robotic training aimed to recovery/improve walking capacity from the initial Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level. It is performed using the Lokomat® (Hocoma AG, Volketswil, Switzerland) gait orthosis. Initial set ups includes 50% body weight unload, gait velocity adjusted on the patient individual capability (1.5 km/h on average) and 100% guidance force. Both weight unload and guidance force are gradually reduced across sessions according to patient recovery of muscle strength and allowing patients to work harden and move more freely.

Children engagement, active participation and motivation were reinforced through frequent encouragement by therapists and performance feedback implemented in the exercise video-games.

Other Names:
  • Lokomat

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
GMFM - T-pre
Time Frame: The week before the beginning of the treatment
Gross Motor Function Measures (GMFM) acquired before the beginning of the treatment. (Functional measure)
The week before the beginning of the treatment
6mwt - T-pre
Time Frame: The week before the beginning of the treatment
Six minute walking test (6mwt) performed before the beginning of the treatment. (Functional measure)
The week before the beginning of the treatment
Ashowrth scale - T-pre
Time Frame: The week before the beginning of the treatment
Ashowrth scale acquired before the beginning of the treatment. (Functional measure)
The week before the beginning of the treatment
Tardieu scale - T-pre
Time Frame: The week before the beginning of the treatment
Tardieu scale acquired before the beginning of the treatment. (Functional measure)
The week before the beginning of the treatment
GMFM - T-post
Time Frame: Within a week after the ent of the treatment
Gross Motor Function Measures (GMFM) acquired after the end of the treatment. (Functional measure)
Within a week after the ent of the treatment
6mwt - T-post
Time Frame: Within a week after the ent of the treatment
Six minute walking test (6mwt) performed after the end of the treatment. (Functional measure)
Within a week after the ent of the treatment
Ashowrth scale - T-post
Time Frame: Within a week after the ent of the treatment
Ashowrth scale acquired performed after the end of the treatment. (Functional measure)
Within a week after the ent of the treatment
Tardieu scale - T-post
Time Frame: Within a week after the ent of the treatment
Tardieu scale acquired performed after the end of the treatment. (Functional measure)
Within a week after the ent of the treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
WF - T-pre
Time Frame: The week before the beginning of the treatment
Water fraction (WF) in the muscular bundles measured from MRI Dixon data acquired before the beginning of the treatment
The week before the beginning of the treatment
FF - T-pre
Time Frame: The week before the beginning of the treatment
Fat fraction (FF) in the muscular bundles measured from MRI Dixon data acquired before the beginning of the treatment
The week before the beginning of the treatment
FA - T-pre
Time Frame: The week before the beginning of the treatment
Fractional Anisotropy (FA) in the muscular bundles measured from MRI Diffusion data acquired before the beginning of the treatment
The week before the beginning of the treatment
MD - T-pre
Time Frame: The week before the beginning of the treatment
Mean Diffusivity (MD) in the muscular bundles measured from MRI Diffusion data acquired before the beginning of the treatment
The week before the beginning of the treatment
WF - T-post
Time Frame: Within a week after the end of the treatment
Water fraction (WF) in the muscular bundles measured from MRI Dixon data acquired at the end of the treatment
Within a week after the end of the treatment
FF - T-post
Time Frame: Within a week after the end of the treatment
Fat fraction (FF) in the muscular bundles measured from MRI Dixon data acquired at the end of the treatment
Within a week after the end of the treatment
FA - T-post
Time Frame: Within a week after the end of the treatment
Fractional Anisotropy (FA) in the muscular bundles measured from MRI Diffusion data acquired at the end of the treatment
Within a week after the end of the treatment
MD - T-post
Time Frame: Within a week after the end of the treatment
Mean Diffusivity (MD) in the muscular bundles measured from MRI Diffusion data acquired at the end of the treatment
Within a week after the end of the treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Denis Peruzzo, PhD, Research Institute IRCCS Eugenio Medea

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 30, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 24, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Traumatic Brain Injury

Clinical Trials on Physical Rehabilitation without lokomat

3
Subscribe