- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04797754
Systematic Development and Test-Retest Reliability of EISA (EISA)
Systematic Development and Test-Retest Reliability of Electronic Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Satisfaction Assessment (EISA)
The purpose of this proposed study, is the development and validation of EISA, a Self-report outcome measurement tool, for assessing the satisfaction of everyday functional needs, for consumers using Electronic Assistive Devices (EADs) as the primary means to complete Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs). The EISA outcome measure is proposed to be designed as a questionnaire that can be self or interview-administered to users of EADs. The development of EISA shall be modeled along the lines of development of the self-report outcome measure, Functional Mobility Assessment (FMA) (Kumar et al., 2013). The proposed tool EISA, would serve as a dynamic gage, for assessing perceived user function, related to using EADs for completing IADLs. The instrument is proposed to undergo systematic development in three phases. In phase 1, an initial pool of potential EISA items shall be generated, based on literature review data.
In phase 2, content experts (clinician and EADs user) review panels, shall assess the initial pool of potential EISA items for further content validity. The objective of phase 3, would be a validation of the first iteration of EISA, by establishing reliability for test-retest administration and internal consistency, at acceptable levels, by 25-100 EADs users. Statistical analysis for test-retest reliability and internal consistency estimation shall be carried out in phase 3 of the study, using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24 software.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Objective: The purpose of this proposed study, is the development and validation of EISA, a Self-report outcome measurement tool, for assessing satisfaction of everyday functional needs, for consumers using EADs as the primary means to complete IADLs. The EISA outcome measure is proposed to be designed as a questionnaire that can be self or interview administered to users of EADs. Development of EISA shall be modeled along the lines of development of the self-report outcome measure, FMA (Kumar et al., 2013). The proposed tool EISA would serve as a dynamic gauge, for assessing perceived user function, related to using EADs for completing IADLs.
Specific Aims:
The instrument is proposed to undergo systematic development in three phases. In Phase 1, an initial pool of potential EISA items shall be generated, based on literature review data.
In Phase 2, content experts (clinician and EADs user) review panels, shall assess the initial pool of potential EISA items for further content validity. The objective of phase 3, would be validation of the first iteration of EISA, by establishing reliability for test-retest administration and internal consistency, at acceptable levels, by 25-100 EADs users.
Statistical analysis for test-retest reliability and internal consistency estimation shall be carried out using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24 software, in Phase 3 of the study.
Background: Briefly describe previous findings or observations that provide the background leading to this proposal. It cannot be stressed enough, that for both able-bodied individuals and PWD, having access to ICT, is no longer a luxury, but rather, a basic necessity, to cope with the current technology based lifestyle. Furthermore, having equal and timely access to IT for PWD is imperative to enable them to live independently and have a high Quality of Life. Moreover, this equal and timely access not only provides increased life options for PWD but also, wider economic benefits for the society at large. However, currently, several factors are impeding this equal and timely access to ICT for PWD. These factors include (1) lack of an outcome measure specifically designed and validated to assess the satisfaction of everyday functional needs related to EAD; (2) inappropriateness, impracticality, apart from lack of clinical utility and psychometric validation of existing outcome measures to assess the satisfaction of everyday functional needs of PWD, related to EADs; (3) continual and fast-paced, disruptive innovations very often rendering essential services inaccessible for PWD. Therefore, to fill this unmet need, as well as, to enable PWD to have equal opportunity with able-bodied individuals to tap their optimal potential, this study proposes the development and validation of a self-report outcome measure, EISA, specifically designed to assess satisfaction of everyday functional needs of PWD, related to EADs.
Significance: In this day and age of IT, it is crucial for PWD to have access to EAD that matches their individualized needs and enables them to achieve their optimal potential. Nevertheless, as can be gleaned from the aforementioned analysis, currently there is no good outcome tool for the assessment of user-satisfaction in performing functional needs with EADs.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15206
- University of Pittsburgh
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Should be an existing user of EADs for at least 3 months
- Must be 18 years of age or older
- Should be capable of cognitively reading instructions and answering questions within the Qualtrics online research platform
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unable to read English
- Unable to independently answer or have assistance from someone to answer the survey questions
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Electronic Instrumental activities of daily living Satisfaction Assessment (EISA)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The EISA is a self-report outcome measurement tool, for assessing satisfaction of everyday functional needs, for consumers using Electronic Assistive Devices (EADs) as the primary means to complete IADLs.
The EISA outcome measure is proposed to be designed as a questionnaire that can be self or interview administered to users of EADs.
|
6 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Demographic Questionnaires
Time Frame: Six Months
|
This questionnaire is used to collect demographic information about the study cohort including age, experience using internet-connected EADs, level of education completed, if disabled, type of disability, etc.
|
Six Months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Mark R Schmeler, PhD, University of Pittsburgh, School of Health and Rehabilitation Professionals
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Day H, Jutai J, Campbell KA. Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: lessons learned and the road ahead. Disabil Rehabil. 2002 Jan 10-Feb 15;24(1-3):31-7. doi: 10.1080/09638280110066343.
- Demers L, Monette M, Descent M, Jutai J, Wolfson C. The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS): translation and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a Canadian-French version. Qual Life Res. 2002 Sep;11(6):583-92. doi: 10.1023/a:1016397412708.
- Scherer M, Jutai J, Fuhrer M, Demers L, Deruyter F. A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007 Jan;2(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/17483100600845414.
- Donnelly C, Carswell A. Individualized outcome measures: a review of the literature. Can J Occup Ther. 2002 Apr;69(2):84-94. doi: 10.1177/000841740206900204.
- Kumar A, Schmeler MR, Karmarkar AM, Collins DM, Cooper R, Cooper RA, Shin H, Holm MB. Test-retest reliability of the functional mobility assessment (FMA): a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013 May;8(3):213-9. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2012.688240. Epub 2012 May 22.
- Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Parsey C, Lamb R. Development and psychometric properties of the instrumental activities of daily living: compensation scale. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2014 Dec;29(8):776-92. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acu053. Epub 2014 Oct 25.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PRO17030604
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sensory Disorder
-
Boston University Charles River CampusCompletedSensory Processing DisorderUnited States
-
University of Southern DenmarkProtac A/SRecruitingChildren | Sensory Processing DisorderDenmark
-
Tel Aviv UniversityCompletedSensory Modulation Disorder | Sensory Over-ResponsivityIsrael
-
Uskudar UniversityHacettepe UniversityCompleted
-
University of NebraskaRecruitingAutism Spectrum Disorder | Sensory Processing Disorder | Autism | Sensory Over-ResponsivityUnited States
-
Gazi UniversityCompletedSensory Disorder | Preterm | Attachment DisorderTurkey
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center at...Not yet recruitingSensory Processing DisorderUnited States
-
Atlas UniversityRecruitingHip Fractures | Elderly | Sensory Processing Disorder | Sensory Disorder | Fall Injury | Falling | SensitivityTurkey
-
University of ThessalyCompleted
-
Pingale, Vidya, OTRTina S. Fletcher, EdD, MFA, OTR; Catherine Candler, PhD, OTR; Noralyn Pickens... and other collaboratorsCompletedSensory Processing Disorder | Autism | Special EducationUnited States