Feasibility of M-health Version of "What Were We Thinking" Intervention to Promote Maternal Postpartum Mental Health

September 29, 2021 updated by: Soledad Coo Calcagni, Universidad del Desarrollo

Preliminary Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Intervention And Now What? to Promote Maternal Mental Health in the Postpartum Period in the Primary Health System in Chile.

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of "What Were We Thinking" (WWWT) a psychoeducational intervention -delivered remotely via communication technologies- to prevent symptoms of postpartum depression and anxiety in new mothers; which has been shown to be effective in primary health settings. WWWT was developed in Australia and has been culturally adapted to be used in Chile. The m-health version of the Chilean adaptation of WWWT for the current study includes: Psychoeducational modules on issues relevant to mothers during the post-partum period; contact with the program facilitator through instant messaging services available on mobile phones and a virtual group meeting.

This pilot study will use a mixed design. The quantitative component will consist of a before-after design with control group including 90 adult mothers of child aged 6-8 weeks who receive health care in a primary health centers in Santiago, Chile. Mothers will be randomized into the experimental (EG) or control groups (CG) in a rate of 1:1. Both EG and CG will receive usual treatment provided by primary health centers (TAU), and only de EG will receive the m-health adapted version of the WWWT.

The qualitative component considers 12 users semi-structured interviews. The maximum variation sampling strategy will be used according to the completion of m-health version of WWWT. An open coding of Grounded Theory will be used to data analysis.

The feasibility of m-health version of WWWT intervention will be evaluated in terms of eligibility rates, recruitment rates and reasons for study refusals, feasibility to deliver the three components of the intervention, data attrition and follow-up rates by treatment condition. Their acceptability considers participant completion of the intervention rates, and a qualitative assessment of the users' acceptability of and satisfaction. Secondary outcomes will include changes on maternal levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms, maternal self-efficacy and perceived social support. And differences in mother-infant quality of interaction between intervention and control groups.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Mental health symptoms are common in new mothers. Despite the availability of effective screening and referral in the primary health system in Chile, very few women access treatment due to diverse barriers (i.e., long waiting lists and insufficient knowledge about postnatal depression and treatment). This highlights the importance of using a preventive approach. Currently in Chile there are no universal preventive interventions, although they are available internationally.

Thus, this study seeks to assess if it's feasible and acceptable to offer an alternative intervention that can be delivered remotely by mobile phones, to support women in the early postpartum period by promoting confidence and reducing distress in first time mothers. By doing so, it will increase the number of available interventions to promote and prevent children´s early adverse experiences related to maternal mental health problems.

This study accounts for the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of "What Were We Thinking" (WWWT) a psychoeducational intervention -delivered remotely via communication technologies- to prevent symptoms of postpartum depression and anxiety in new mothers. WWWT was developed in Australia and has been culturally adapted to be used in Chile. The m-health version of the Chilean adaptation of WWWT includes:

  1. Psychoeducational information for understanding and managing infant behavior and about parenting. Modules on understanding and managing infant behavior include information on: infant temperament, including such as differences in the reactivity, responsivity and regulation of young infants; amount and known and unknown reasons for infant crying; stimulation, over-stimulation and soothing; infant sleep needs and optimal sleep habits; the use of settling strategies to achieve these while supporting breastfeeding; and establishing sustainable routines of daily care: the feed, play, sleep routine. Modules on matters relating to parents include: gendered differences in the losses and gains of parenthood; differences in emotional needs and the potential for adverse reproductive events to have lasting psychological effects on women after the birth of a baby; and developing strategies to assist couples to address these in a non-confrontational manner. This information will be delivered through instant messaging services for mobile phones (i.e., Whatsapp) 3 times a week for four-week period. Each module will include a very brief video offering information regarding a specific topic, a proposed personal exercise and the invitation to assess the perceived usefulness of the information received. Some modules include links to external, complementary information from the Chilean Infancy Policy.
  2. Contact with the program trained facilitator. It will allow mothers to ask questions that arise from the topics addressed in the psychoeducational videos and share their personal experiences. The facilitator responses will focus on aiding the understanding and elaboration of the contents. This will be done through instant messaging service for mobile phones (i.e., Whatsapp). In the present study, the facilitator will be a mental health professional of the research team, that has been trained on the intervention model.
  3. Group virtual meeting. A virtual group meeting will take place with mothers and their partners (or significant others) and the program facilitator. The group meeting seeks to offer an instance were new mothers and fathers can share their experiences regarding their parenthood and the changes it has involved in their daily lives, as well as providing the opportunity for developing support networks among them.

This pilot study will use a mixed design. The quantitative component will consist of a before-after design with control group including 90 adult mothers of child aged 6-8 weeks who receive health care in a primary health centers in Santiago. Mothers will be randomized into the experimental (EG) or control groups (CG) in a rate of 1:1. Mothers in the EG will receive the m-health version of WWWT intervention plus the usual treatment that primary health centers (TAU) provided to children. Participants in the CG will be subject to TAU. TAU for children under one year of age include routine health checks by health professionals (nurse or doctor), every month from 0 to 4 months of age, and at 6, 8 and 12 months of age. The objective of the routine health care check is to carry out a comprehensive evaluation of the child's development and growth, guide parents and caregivers regarding child development, health and upbringing of the child. Also, promoting exclusive breastfeeding, healthy mother/child bonding (by detecting relevant alterations in this area) and encouraging paternal participation in upbringing and care of the child. Finally, in the health check-ups at 2 and 6 months of age of the child, Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale is used for screening depressive symptoms in mothers. At risk cases are referred for mental health assessment and care. A waiting list procedure will allow the delivery of the intervention to control women once the data collection for the study has been completed.

The participating mothers will be contacted in coordination with the health providers of two public primary health centers after the first newborn health check. All women who meet the inclusion criteria will be contacted by the research assistant to participate of the research project. Women who wish to participate will be randomly assigned to the EG or CG. Both groups will receive informed consent and will be assessed regarding sociodemographic characteristics, mother's symptoms of anxiety and depression, maternal self-efficacy and perceived social support. The participants in both groups will be assessed a week before the start of the intervention (baseline) and three months after its completion (follow-up). After the intervention is completed, the qualitative component of the study will be carried out to access of the users' acceptability and satisfaction. It considers 12 semi-structured interviews to members of the EG group. The maximum variation sampling strategy will be used according to the completion of the intervention. An open coding of Grounded Theory will be used to data analysis.

The feasibility of m-health version of WWWT will be evaluated in terms of eligibility rates, recruitment rates and reasons for study refusals, feasibility to deliver the three components of the intervention, data attrition and follow-up rates by treatment condition. Their acceptability considers participant completion of the intervention rates, and a qualitative assessment of the users' acceptability and satisfaction. Quantitative indicators of feasibility and acceptability will be presented on frequency and/or percentage. Secondary outcomes will include: changes in maternal postnatal symptoms of depression and anxiety, change in parenting self-efficacy and perceived social support in both groups. Mixed-ANOVA analysis will be used to examine this variables differences between EG and CG whilst subjecting participants to repeated measures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Soledad Coo
  • Phone Number: 56968417262
  • Email: scoo@udd.cl

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • First time mothers
  • Adult (18 -64 years old)
  • Having a healthy infant who is 6-8 weeks age
  • Receive medical care in a primary health centers
  • Having access to a mobile phone with instant messaging services (i.e., Whatsapp)
  • Fluent in Spanish

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe mental health problem (i.e. schizophrenia, mood disorder with suicidal ideation)
  • Cognitive disability
  • Actual substance abuse
  • High risk for presenting symptoms of depression (EPDS above cut-off score)
  • Severe psychosocial problem (i.e. domestic violence, sexual abuse).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: m-health version of WWWT intervention
Include: a) Psychoeducational information for understanding and managing infant behavior and on parenting. This information will be delivered through instant messaging service for mobile phones (i.e., Whatsapp) 3 times a week for four-week period. Each module will include a very brief video offering information regarding a specific topic, a proposed personal exercise and the invitation to assess the perceived usefulness of the information received. Some modules include links to external, complementary information from the Chilean Infancy Policy. b) Contact with the program facilitator. It will allow mothers to ask questions that arise from the topics addressed in the psychoeducational videos. The answers seek to promote the understanding and elaboration of the contents, and operate by providing expert support; c) A virtual group meeting.
m-health version of Chilean adaptation of WWWT intervention: a) Psychoeducational information for understanding and managing infant behavior and on parenting. b) Contact with the program facilitator. c) A virtual group meeting
Other: TREATMENT AS USUAL
TAU for children under one year of age include routine health checks by health professionals (nurse or doctor), every month from 0 to 4 months of age, and at 6, 8 and 12 months of age. The objective of the routine health care check is to carry out a comprehensive evaluation of the child's development and growth, guide parents and caregivers regarding child development, health and upbringing of the child. Also, promoting exclusive breastfeeding, healthy mother/child bonding (by detecting relevant alterations in this area) and encouraging paternal participation in upbringing and care of the child. Finally, in the health check-ups at 2 and 6 months of age of the child, Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale is used for screening depressive symptoms in mothers. At risk cases are referred for mental health assessment and care.
TAU for children under one year of age include routine health checks by health professionals (nurse or doctor), every month from 0 to 4 months of age, and at 6, 8 and 12 months of age

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Eligibility rate as feasibility indicator
Time Frame: At the baseline assessment during the recruitment period.
Proportion of women who meet inclusion criteria compared with the total number of new mothers registered during the recruitment period in each participating primary health center
At the baseline assessment during the recruitment period.
Recruitment rate as feasibility indicator
Time Frame: At the baseline assessment during the recruitment period.
Proportion of mothers who accept the invitation to participate in the study respect to those meet eligibility criteria
At the baseline assessment during the recruitment period.
Percentage of EG participants who receive the 12 psychoeducational modules, who attend the virtual meeting and who -at least- once established contact with the program facilitator
Time Frame: At 4-weeks from beginning intervention (when intervention finished)
The feasibility to deliver the components of the intervention will be measured in terms of the percentage of participants of the EG who receive the 12 psychoeducational modules, who attend the virtual meeting and who -at least- once established contact with the program facilitator.
At 4-weeks from beginning intervention (when intervention finished)
Percentage of participants who finished intervention by group as acceptability indicator
Time Frame: At 4-weeks from beginning intervention (when intervention finished).
Proportion of participants who finished the intervention compared with a number of participant who began intervention in each group
At 4-weeks from beginning intervention (when intervention finished).
Percentage of participant retention at follow-up by group as acceptability indicator
Time Frame: At 12-weeks after the completion of the intervention (follow-up measurement).
Proportion of participants who remain in the study at the 12 weeks follow up compared with a number of participant who began intervention in each group
At 12-weeks after the completion of the intervention (follow-up measurement).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in maternal postnatal symptoms of depression, according to mean scores obtained with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)
Time Frame: At baseline (a week before the intervention starts) and 12-weeks after the completion of the intervention (follow-up measurement).
The EPDS is a 10-item, self-report questionnaire used for screening current maternal symptoms of depression using a 4-point scale, total score ranging from 0 to 30 points. This scale has been validated in Chile.
At baseline (a week before the intervention starts) and 12-weeks after the completion of the intervention (follow-up measurement).
Change in maternal postnatal symptoms of anxiety according to mean scores obtained with the Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale (PASS)
Time Frame: At baseline (a week before the intervention starts) and 12-weeks after the completion of the intervention (follow-up measurement).
The PASS is a 31-item, self-report questionnaire assesses maternal perinatal anxiety over the past month. A total score is calculated by adding all items that indicates level of severity: minimal (0-20 points), mild to moderate (21-41 points) and severe (42-93). The PASS includes four subscales, namely general worry and specific fears; perfectionism, control and trauma; social anxiety; and acute anxiety and adjustment.
At baseline (a week before the intervention starts) and 12-weeks after the completion of the intervention (follow-up measurement).
Changes on perceived social support according to mean scores obtained with the multidimensional perceived social support scale (MSPSS)
Time Frame: At baseline (a week before the intervention starts) and 12-weeks after the completion of the intervention (follow-up measurement).
The MSPSS is a 12 items self-report scale. It includes 3 subscales on perceived social support in three areas: family, friends and significant. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert-scale (1 = very strongly disagree; 7 = very strongly agree). Three subscales' scores (range 4 to 28) and a total score (range 12 to 84) are estimated by adding the item scores. It has been translated and validated for the Chilean population.
At baseline (a week before the intervention starts) and 12-weeks after the completion of the intervention (follow-up measurement).
Change in maternal self-efficacy according to mean scores obtained with the Parental Evaluation Scale (PEE)
Time Frame: At baseline (a week before the intervention starts) and 12-weeks after the completion of the intervention (follow-up measurement).
The PEE is a 10-items self-report questionnaire to assess satisfaction and self-efficacy feelings about motherhood in women with children ages 0-2 years. Each item is rated on a 11-point scale (0=strongly disagree; 10=strongly agree) and the total score is estimated by adding item scores and then divided by 10
At baseline (a week before the intervention starts) and 12-weeks after the completion of the intervention (follow-up measurement).

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reasons for study refusals as a feasibility indicator
Time Frame: At the baseline assessment during the recruitment period.
A list will be made containing the different reasons given by women who refused to participate, the results will be aggregated in terms of percentages.
At the baseline assessment during the recruitment period.
Acceptability and satisfaction of the intervention from EG mothers' perspective
Time Frame: During a 12 weeks period following the completion of the intervention
EG mothers' acceptability and satisfaction with the intervention, assessed through qualitative semi-structured interviews
During a 12 weeks period following the completion of the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Soledad Coo, Universidad del Desarrollo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 3, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 7, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual quantitative participant data that underlie the reported results, after deidentification (text, tables and figures).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

These data will be available to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for the purposes of achieving specific aims outlined in that proposal. Proposals should be directed to Soledad Cood and J. Carola Pérez via email (scoo@udd.cl; janetperez@udd.cl) and will be reviewed by both researchers. Requests to access data to undertake hypothesis-driven research will not be unreasonably withheld. To gain access, data requesters will need to sign a data access agreement and to confirm that data will only be used for the agreed purpose for which access was granted and this these data will be not shared to other people.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression, Postpartum

Clinical Trials on m-health version of WWWT intervention

3
Subscribe