Effects of PSAPs on Speech Processing

November 22, 2022 updated by: Claude Alain, Rotman Research Institute at Baycrest

Immediate Effects of Personal Sound Amplification Products on Speech Processing

Mild to moderate hearing loss remains undertreated, largely because of the high cost of hearing aids. A promising and much less expensive alternative is the use of personal sound amplification products (PSAPs), which are electronic, portable, over-the-counter devices that amplify sound. Studies have shown that the use of PSAPs provides significant hearing benefits and improves the quality of life for older adults with mild to moderate hearing loss. However, there is insufficient data to determine the impact of PSAPs use on speech processing in the brain.

The purpose of this study is to use electroencephalography (EEG) measurements to assess the neurobiological and behavioral effects of PSAPs on speech perception in noise in individuals with mild to moderate hearing loss.

The investigators expect that the PSAPs use will result in an immediate improvement in the ability to perceive speech-in-noise, supporting that these hearing devices may be a means of restoring communication skills in people with mild to moderate hearing loss. Behavioral benefits will be associated with increased brain activity in auditory regions and connectivity between auditory and speech regions in the brain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This study will consist of two sessions of 3 hours each. On one session, participants will perform the speech-in-noise task without hearing devices and on the other session, participants will perform the speech-in-noise task while wearing personal sound amplification products. The order of the sessions will be counterbalanced across participants. The speech-in-noise task consists in a word discrimination task in babble noise at three signal-to-noise ratios. On each trial, the task is to determine whether two words are identical or different.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M6A 2E1
        • Rotman Research Institute at Baycrest Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Right-handed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mother tongue not English
  • Language impairment
  • Dementia
  • Cerebrovascular diseases
  • Untreated vision impairment;
  • Tinnitus and otologic disorders
  • Cochlear implant
  • History of prior hearing aid use
  • Diagnosed addiction (alcohol or drugs)
  • Significant medical or neurocognitive conditions or interventions likely to significantly impact cognitive function (e.g., epilepsy, stroke, traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness > 5 minutes, brain tumor, multiple sclerosis, hepatitis C, developmental delay, electroconvulsive therapy)
  • a diagnosis (based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5)) of major depressive disorder with active symptoms within 90 days of study entry, past or present psychosis, or other psychiatric disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and bipolar disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Personal sound amplification products
Speech perception will be evaluated using personal sound amplification products.
Participants will be tested with bilateral personal sound amplification products.
No Intervention: Control
Speech perception will be evaluated without using hearing devices.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in EEG measure of wave amplitude with and without PSAPs
Time Frame: 6 hours
Difference in EEG wave amplitude (in μV) in the speech-in-noise task when using PSAPs and when using no device.
6 hours
Difference in EEG measure of wave latency with and without PSAPs
Time Frame: 6 hours
Difference in EEG wave latency (in milliseconds) in the speech-in-noise task when using PSAPs and when using no device.
6 hours
Difference in EEG measure of wave oscillations with and without PSAPs
Time Frame: 6 hours
Difference in EEG wave time-frequency oscillations in the speech-in-noise task when using PSAPs and when using no device.
6 hours
Difference in EEG measure of connectivity strength with and without PSAPs
Time Frame: 6 hours
Difference in connectivity strength in the speech-in-noise task when using PSAPs and when using no device.
6 hours
Difference in the percentage of correct responses with and without PSAPs
Time Frame: 6 hours
Difference in the percentage (%) of correct responses in the speech-in-noise task when using PSAPs and when using no device.
6 hours
Difference in reaction time with and without PSAPs
Time Frame: 6 hours
Difference in reaction time (in milliseconds) in the speech-in-noise task when using PSAPs and when using no device.
6 hours
Difference in sensitivity with and without PSAPs
Time Frame: 6 hours
Difference in sensitivity in the speech-in-noise task when using PSAPs and when using no device. Sensitivity is a measure of the ability to correctly recognize whether pairs are different or not.
6 hours
Difference in criterion with and without PSAPs
Time Frame: 6 hours
Difference in criterion in the speech-in-noise task when using PSAPs and when using no device. The criterion is a measure of response bias that measures the tendency to choose one response over another.
6 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in self-reported measure of listening effort with and without PSAPs
Time Frame: 6 hours
Difference in self-reported listening effort in the speech-in-noise task when using PSAPs and when using no device. Listening effort is measured on a 7-point scale.
6 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Claude Alain, PhD, Rotman Research Institute at Baycrest Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Demographic and health information, behavioral results, and EEG recordings will be shared on an open platform only if participants consent. The data will be anonymized using a random generic code. No personally identifiable data will be shared. The code and stimuli of the task will also be shared on the platform.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will be shared when the article is published and will remain accessible as long as possible.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be shared on an open platform to be determined. The web address of the data sharing will be inserted in the article, and anyone can access the data from this link.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hearing Loss, Age-Related

Clinical Trials on Personal sound amplification products

3
Subscribe