- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05193903
Evaluation of an Interactive Risk Information Tool to Increase COVID-19 Vaccination Incidence in Vaccine-hesitant People (iWILL)
Evaluation of an Interactive Risk Information Tool to Increase COVID-19 Vaccination Incidence in Vaccine-hesitant People During Omicron Wave in Germany
Coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines have saved millions of lives since release and remain a key tool in the fight against the pandemic.
However, most countries have not reached the vaccine uptake rates needed to relieve pressure on hospitals and intensive care units (ICUs) during peak corona periods. Reduced effectiveness of vaccines in preventing infections with the Omicron variant and milder courses of the disease may trigger and support beliefs that vaccination is no longer necessary, especially among vaccine sceptics.The term 'vaccine sceptic', however, is used heterogeneously and often interchangeably to describe both 'vaccine hesitants' and 'vaccine deniers'. In contrast to vaccine deniers, characterized by a definite and unwavering decision not to get vaccinated, vaccine hesitants are characterized by a spectrum of indecisiveness, with a high need for information on both benefits and harms. They may still decide to get vaccinated if information succeeds in convincing them. In light of the potential for a change of mind in vaccine-hesitants the key question is: How does one best address their high needs for balanced risk ratio information? Evidence from cognitive and behavioral science suggests that interactive simulations of risk information, which imitate mechanisms by which humans sequentially and experientially sample risk information naturally, can be more effective in helping people develop adequate risk perceptions and initiate behavioral change than the ubiquitously used conventional text-based formats. The study therefore seeks to determine if interactive risk ratio simulation relative to a text-based format are more effective in prompting positive change in unvaccinated, vaccine-hesitant respondents' intention to get the COVID-19 and also in the respective benefit-to-harm ratio assessment during the Omicron wave in Germany.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The iWILL study is a cross sectional study that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of interactive risk ratio simulation (intervention) relative to a text-based format (control) in COVID-19 vaccine-hesitant people in Germany.
The objectives of iWILL are:
- to adapt the already piloted, digital, interactive, evidence-based counseling tool ExploreVac (focus on herd protection) as well as a new simulation (focus on individual protection) to the most current evidence (including age adjustment) for communicating vaccine effectiveness and side effects as evidence-based patient information using the example of COVID-19 vaccination,
- to implement the adapted version of ExploreVac and the new simulation in care with the aim to increase the vaccination incidence among vaccine hesitant individuals, to improve their subjective assessment of vaccination's benefits and harms, and to reduce the presumed increased counseling effort of the GP compared to standard care,
- to test whether the intervention is superior as compared to the control on these endpoints,
- to draw conclusions about the transferability of the developed method for other established vaccinations (HPV, influenza protection) and vaccinations for future infectious diseases.
Primary hypothesis:
(H1) The intervention group (interactive simulations) will show a higher positive change (T0/baseline to T1/after intervention) in vaccination intention than the control group (text-based information).
Secondary hypotheses:
(H2) The intervention group (interactive simulations) will show a higher positive change (T0/baseline to T1/after intervention) in their positive subjective benefit-to-harm assessment of the COVID-19 vaccine's benefit-to-harm ratio than does the control group.
(H3) The intervention group reports a lower need for additional counseling by their GPs than does the control group.
(H4) The intervention group (interactive simulations) will show a higher correspondence between their intended behavior (T1) and their actual reported vacccinataion behavior (T2/ follow-up after 6 months).
Recruitment of unvaccinated, vaccine hesitant German residents will be established by using probability-based internet panels maintained by respondi (Cologne, Germany). The study will be pursued with cross-sectional national sample.
Intervention condition: two interactive simulations informing 1) about absolute risks of infection, hospitalization, ICU admission, and death after exposure to COVID-19 relative to vaccination's side effects (e.g., myocarditis in men ≤35 years) in 100,000 vaccinated and 100,000 unvaccinated individuals, all adjustable to four different age groups (18- 34 years, 35-59 years, 60-79 years, ≥ 80 years due to considerable differences in each of the depicted risks (Supplement) and 2) about the benefits of vaccination for the population as a whole (herd) in terms of preventing infections and deaths.
Control condition (see also below): two text module informing 1) about absolute risks of infection, hospitalization, ICU admission, and death after exposure to COVID-19 relative to vaccination's side effects (e.g., myocarditis in men ≤35 years) in 100,000 vaccinated and 100,000 unvaccinated individuals, all adjustable to four different age groups (18- 34 years, 35-59 years, 60-79 years, ≥ 80 years due to considerable differences in each of the depicted risks (Supplement) and 2) about the benefits of vaccination for the population as a whole (herd) in terms of preventing infections and deaths.
The educative information material in both conditions is based on non-directive evidence-based patient counseling according to the guideline on evidence-based health information. After the study condition, participants are informed that any further questions about vaccination can be discussed with the GP.
The questionnaire at T0 (baseline) and T1 (directly after the intervention) takes maximum 10 minutes to complete (without exploration of intervention material). Given that participants are free to spend as much time as participants want with the educative information material, the total survey time can be longer, however.
About six months after first participation in the study, participants are re-contacted via e-mail and are asked to fill out a second questionnaire (6-months follow-up, T2), which approximately takes about 5 minutes to complete to learn more about potential the translation of the intention into vaccination behavior.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Odette Wegwarth, Prof. Dr.
- Phone Number: +49(0) 30 450 531 074
- Email: odette.wegwarth@charite.de
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Clara O Schirren, MA
- Phone Number: +49(0) 30 450 - 531 056
- Email: clara.schirren@charite.de
Study Locations
-
-
-
Berlin, Germany
- Recruiting
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
-
Contact:
- Odette Wegwarth, Prof. Dr.
- Phone Number: +49(0) 30 450 - 531 074
- Email: odette.wegwarth@charite.de
-
Principal Investigator:
- Odette Wegwarth, Prof. Dr.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Hesitancy towards COVID-19 vaccination
- Not yet vaccinated against COVID-19
- Age ≥ 18 years.
Exclusion Criteria:
- No hesitancy towards COVID-19 vaccination
- Already vaccinated
- Age < 18 years.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Intervention: Simulation
Interactive information tools
|
The participants in the intervention group receive two interactive simulations in addition to a general text module that provides sequential, animated information on the spread of the virus without prevention, the effectiveness of vaccination and potential side effects of vaccination on a herd protection level and the individual level.
|
Other: Control: Text
Standard text-based information
|
The participants in the control group receive two text-based information in addition to a general text module that provides information on the spread of the virus without prevention, the effectiveness of vaccination and potential side effects of vaccination on a herd protection level and the individual level. Both conditions ensure the provision of a level of knowledge that at least corresponds to standard care. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change from baseline vaccination intention at T1
Time Frame: Immediately after Intervention (T1)
|
Change in 5-point response scale of vaccination intention between baseline and post-intervention judgement "I will definitely get the COVID-19 vaccination"; "I will probably get the COVID-19 vaccination"; "I am unsure if I will get the COVID-19 vaccination"; "I will probably not get the COVID-19 vaccination", and "I will definitely not get the COVID-19 vaccination." NOTE: This scale is categorical, that means values are only used to distinguish between the 5 categories and DO NOT indicate better or worse outcomes. |
Immediately after Intervention (T1)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change from baseline assessment of vaccine-related benefiit-to-harm at T1
Time Frame: Immediately after Intervention (T1)
|
Change in 5-point response scale of vaccine-related benefiit-to-harm assessment The benefits of the COVID-19 vaccination clearly outweigh the harms," "The benefits of the COVID-19 vaccination somewhat outweigh the harms," "Benefits and harms of the COVID-19 vaccination are balanced," "The harms of the COVID-19 vaccination somewhat outweigh the benefits," "The harms of the COVID-19 vaccination clearly outweigh the benefits." NOTE: This scale is categorical, that means values are only used to distinguish between the 5 categories and DO NOT indicate better or worse outcomes. |
Immediately after Intervention (T1)
|
Number of GP counselings at 6-months follow-up
Time Frame: 6-months follow up (T2)
|
Measured by the number of visits of the GP to receive additional counselling on the vaccine after study intervention/control
|
6-months follow up (T2)
|
Actual vaccination behavior at T2
Time Frame: 6-months follow up (T2)
|
Used to check for correspondence between vaccination intention expressed at T1 and actual behvavior at T2
|
6-months follow up (T2)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Odette Wegwarth, Prof. Dr., Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- VSF1_2021-194
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on COVID-19 Infection
-
Aga Khan UniversityCompletedCOVID-19 Respiratory Infection | COVID-19 Pandemic | COVID-19 Lower Respiratory InfectionPakistan
-
Catalysis SLCompletedRespiratory Tract Infections | Covid19 | SARS-CoV2 Infection | COVID-19 Pneumonia | COVID-19 Respiratory Infection | Viral Infection | Infection, CoronavirusKazakhstan
-
KARE BiosciencesBiomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority; BioLink Life Sciences... and other collaboratorsRecruitingCOVID-19 Pneumonia | COVID-19 Respiratory InfectionIndia
-
AudibleHealth AI, Inc.Sunrise Research Institute; Analytical Solutions Group, Inc.; Kelley Medical... and other collaboratorsCompletedCoronavirus Disease 2019 | SARS-CoV-2 Infection | COVID-19 Pandemic | COVID-19 Virus Infection | Coronavirus Disease-19 | COVID-19 Virus Disease | 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease | 2019 Novel Coronavirus Infection | 2019-nCoV DiseaseUnited States
-
bioLytical LaboratoriesCompletedCOVID-19 | SARS-CoV-2 Infection | COVID-19 Pandemic | COVID-19 Virus Infection | Coronavirus Disease-19United States
-
Tiziana Life Sciences LTDWithdrawnCovid19 | COVID-19 Respiratory Infection | COVID-19 Lower Respiratory Infection
-
Patrick RobinsonRecruitingCovid19 | COVID-19 Pneumonia | COVID-19 Respiratory Infection | COVID-19 Acute BronchitisUnited States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI); California Institute for Regenerative Medicine...Active, not recruitingAsymptomatic COVID-19 Infection Laboratory-Confirmed | Symptomatic COVID-19 Infection Laboratory-ConfirmedUnited States
-
Mahidol UniversityClinixir Co., Ltd.; Program Management Unit-C (PMU-C), governed by Ministry...CompletedCOVID-19 Infection | COVID-19 VACCINEThailand
-
Yang I. PachankisActive, not recruitingCOVID-19 Respiratory Infection | COVID-19 Stress Syndrome | COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Reaction | COVID-19-Associated Thromboembolism | COVID-19 Post-Intensive Care Syndrome | COVID-19-Associated StrokeChina
Clinical Trials on Simulation
-
Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiRecruiting
-
University of BrasiliaUnknownCompliance Behavior
-
Stanford UniversityCompletedWork-Related ConditionUnited States
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRecruitingAirway Management | Virtual Reality | Education, Medical | Trauma Centers | Students, Medical | ManikinsCanada
-
University of BrasiliaUnknownStress | Learning Process in Nursing Graduation
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkCopenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention ResearchCompletedSimulation | Education | Obstetrics | 'In Situ Simulation'Denmark
-
University of Massachusetts, BostonCompletedNurse's Role | Simulation of Physical IllnessUnited States
-
National University Hospital, SingaporeCompleted