Opioid-free Anesthesia With ESPB in VATS Operation

May 9, 2022 updated by: Meliha Orhon, Marmara University

Comparison of ESPB With Opioid-free Anesthesia and Standardopioid Anesthesia in Patients Who Underwent Lobectomy With VATS Method: a Randomized Controlled Study.

Patients with an ASA score of 3 and below, who will undergo lobectomy with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) method, and who gave informed consent will be included in this study. Patients with contraindications for the application of either of the two methods, with known chronic pain, opioid use, local anesthetic allergy, spinal deformity or mental or psychiatric problems that prevent cooperation, those taking anticoagulants, and those with infection at the injection site will not be included in the study. In addition, patients in the ESPB group who required intraoperative opioids, patients who failed ESPB, and patients who underwent open surgery in both groups will not be included in the analysis. Patients who agree to participate in the study will be randomly assigned to one of the study's opioid-free anesthesia and ESPB (erector spina plan block) (Group 1) or standard opioid (Group 2, control) anesthesia groups. Randomization will be at the ratio of 1:1 and will be done by the closed envelope method. Beforehand, a piece of paper with the name of one of the two groups will be placed inside the envelopes and the envelopes will be closed and mixed. A closed envelope will be drawn at random before the procedure for each patient, and procedures will be carried out according to the group specified on the paper.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Group 1 (opioid-free ESPB) Before induction of anesthesia, patients in this group will undergo ultrasound guidance in a sitting position on the operating table, and an erector spina plan block will be performed with bupivacaine and lidocaine, by entering unilaterally (to the side to be operated) 3 cm lateral to the T5 spinous process. Under standard monitoring (ECG, non-invasive blood pressure, and finger oxygen saturation), anesthesia induction will be performed with propofol (2 mg/kg), ketamine 2 mg/kg, and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg. Bispectral index (BIS) and analgesia nociception index (ANI) monitoring will be started immediately after intubation. Patients will not take any opioids throughout the surgery and will be infused with dexmedetomidine instead. Dexmedetomidine infusion will be started at a dose of 0.4 microgram/kg/hour, BIS < 50 and the dose of dexmedetomidine will be adjusted so that ANI > 50. Patients for whom dexmedetomidine could not be sufficiently effective and opioid use became mandatory will not be included in the analysis. Before postoperative awakening, patients were given 1 g i.v. paracetamol will be given.

Group 2 (standard anesthesia with opioid) Under standard monitoring (ECG, non-invasive blood pressure, and finger oxygen saturation), anesthesia induction will be performed with propofol (2 mg/kg), remifentanil 1 microgram/kg, and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg. Bispectral index (BIS) and analgesia nociception index (ANI) monitoring will be started immediately after intubation. Patients will receive an infusion of remifentanil throughout the surgery. Remifentanil infusion will be started at a dose of 0.5 microgram/kg/hour, and the dose of remifentanil will be adjusted so that BIS < 50 and ANI > 50. Before postoperative awakening, patients were given 1 g i.v. paracetamol will be given.

Perioperative clinical and demographic data of each patient will be collected: age, gender, diagnosis, operation, ASA status, duration of surgery, duration of anesthesia. Intraoperatively, heart rate, blood pressure, ANI and BIS measurements will be made and recorded in all patients at 15-minute intervals. In addition, the total intraoperative opioid dose (Group 2) and dexmedetomidine (Group 1) dose will be recorded.

Post-awakening pain will be assessed and recorded using a visual analog scale (VAS), then patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) will be initiated, with all patients locked in 15 minutes and given 4 mg of morphine at each application by the patient. Pain assessment will be done with VAS at 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. In the postoperative period, the amount of morphine administered by PCA (in the first and second 24 hours) and the required additional analgesics (tramadol, paracetamol, etc.) will be recorded. Groups will be compared for primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.

Although neuropathic pain after VATS is less than the thoracotomy approach, it can still pose a significant postoperative problem. Pain management after VATS is especially important to prevent respiratory complications. However, intraoperative or postoperative excess morphine consumption will also negatively affect postoperative recovery after thoracic surgery. It has been shown that opioid-free anesthesia can reduce the need for morphine and reduce related complications.

In the ultrasound-guided erector spina plan block technique, which is a regional anesthesia technique that has been defined recently, local anesthetic is injected into the erector spina muscle and facial plane and spreads in the caudal and cranial directions. This technique has been successfully used as a postoperative analgesia or intraoperative regional anesthesia technique in areas such as thoracic surgery and trauma, breast surgery, abdominal surgery, and extremity surgery. Erector spina plane block or other block methods have been mostly used for postoperative analgesia after VATS, and they have been shown to provide effective postoperative analgesia and reduce morphine consumption. However, data on the use of ESPB or other block techniques for anesthesia during VATS are limited. Opioid-free anesthesia with the help of ESPB may help recovery by reducing total and postoperative morphine consumption.

The aim of this study is to compare opioid-free anesthesia with ultrasound-guided ESPB in patients who underwent lobectomy with VATS, with standard opioid-containing anesthesia in terms of postoperative morphine requirement, as well as intraoperative variables, postoperative pain management and postoperative recovery, and complications.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maltepe
      • Istanbul, Maltepe, Turkey, 34854
        • Marmara University
      • İ̇stanbul, Maltepe, Turkey, 34854
        • Marmara University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • lobectomy with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) method
  • ASA score of 3 and below
  • willing to be included

Exclusion Criteria:

  • chronic pain
  • current opioid use
  • local anesthetic allergy
  • spinal deformity or mental or psychiatric problems that prevent cooperation
  • anticoagulant use
  • infection at the injection site

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: erector spinae plane block group
Before this process, it will be produced from the bupivacaine plan, which will be made by entering unilaterally 3 cm lateral in the ultrasound to be made from a work section that will be made before the shipment and by lidocaine.
Local anesthetic injection to the erector spinae muscle plane at T5 level on the operation side.
Other Names:
  • Standard opioid anesthesia
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: control group
give opiod in this group of patients
Local anesthetic injection to the erector spinae muscle plane at T5 level on the operation side.
Other Names:
  • Standard opioid anesthesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opioid consumption
Time Frame: the first 48 hours after surgery
measurement of postoperatif opioid requirement and consumption
the first 48 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 10, 2022

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 10, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Opioid Use

Clinical Trials on Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) technique without opioid use

3
Subscribe