Evaluation of a Management Strategy for Second-degree Fibrinous Burns Integrating a Poly-absorbent Dressing (HYDRA-B)

February 8, 2024 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Evaluation of a Management Strategy for Second-degree Fibrinous Burns Integrating a Poly-absorbent Dressing: a Prospective, Controlled, Open, Randomized Multicentre Study

The management of the local treatment of second-degree burns has an influence on the healing time and thus on the quality of the healing process. Fibrin detersion optimizes epidermization and may reduce the need for skin grafting for moderate fibrinous burns. Optimal treatment at this stage is therefore crucial. Since 1968, silver sulphadiazine ointment dressings have been used in the management of burns to minimize the risk of infection. A recent review of the literature suggests that the use of alternative dressings to silver sulphadiazine ointment, from day 3/4, would have a benefit on wound healing, but highlights the insufficient level of evidence in current studies. This probably explains why the prolonged use of silver sulphadiazine dressings remains the rule in the majority of French centres. In the burns department of Hopital Edouard Herriot, PLASTENAN® ointment was used as a relay to silver sulphadiazine after one week of care to promote the detersion of second-degree fibrinous burns. Following the end of its commercialization in 2014, our nursing team wondered whether an ointment or an equivalent dressing was available. A clinical study on URGOCLEAN® dressing was conducted by another team from our university hospital on the detersion of vascular wounds. Given its positive results,the investigator tested its effectiveness on fibrinous burns. A cohort of 70 patients (2014-2018) was thus set up by our nursing team: this dressing used in fibrinous burns showed a low use of skin grafts (2/70), a median healing time of 20 days and an improvement in the quality of the scar. In 2013, a systematic review by the Cochrane compared seven types of dressings for the treatment of superficial and intermediate burns, but the URGOCLEAN® dressing, marketed in 2013, was not included. Considering these findings, the investigator would like to set up a randomized trial to evaluate a strategy integrating the URGOCLEAN® dressing in the management of second-degree fibrinous burns.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

310

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Rhone
      • Lyon, Rhone, France, 69003

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient
  • 2nd degree burn with : Affected body surface between 0.25 et 10% Fibrinous surface between 9 and 156 centimeter/meter square (major axis between 3 and 16 centimeter, minor axis of 3 centimeter minimum) One or more non-contiguous fibrinous surfaces
  • Exudative wet fibrin
  • Patient treated with silver sulphadiazine between Day 0 and Day 4
  • Patient affiliated to a social security scheme
  • Patient who signed a written consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Facial burn
  • Known diabetic patient
  • Patient with severe venous and / or arterial insufficiency (obliterating arteriopathy of the lower limbs stage III and IV)
  • Allergy to one of the components of the URGOCLEAN® dressing (polyacrylate fibers, carboxymethylcellulose, paraffin oil, petroleum jelly)
  • Person under guardianship or curators
  • Patient deprived of liberty
  • Patient for whom silver sulphadiazine is contraindicated (last trimester of pregnancy, lactating woman, allergy to sulfa drugs)
  • Patient treated with pre-impregnated interfaces (URGOTUL SAG®, IALUSET+® compresses,..) during initial care between Day 0 and Day 4

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard strategy
Local treatment with silver sulphadiazine and tulle from day 0 to day 8. From the 9t h day and until healing, the dressings are made with tulle, every 48 hours.
Local treatment with silver sulphadiazine and tulle from day 0 to day 8 (included). From the 9th day and until healing, the dressings are made with tulle, every 48 hours.
Experimental: Strategy incorporating a poly-absorbent dressing
Local treatment of silver sulphadiazine with tulle from day 0 to day 4, then with URGOCLEAN® dressing every 48h from day 5 to day 8. From the 9th day and until healing, the dressings are made with tulle, every 48 hours.
Local treatment of silver sulphadiazine with tulle from day 0 to day 4, then with URGOCLEAN® dressing every 48h from day 5 to day 8. From the 9th day and until healing, the dressings are made with tulle, every 48 hours.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with a skin graft performed before D21
Time Frame: At day 21
The number of patients with a skin graft performed before D21 will be calculated. In case the graft is indicated but the patient refuses it, he will be counted as having had a graft.
At day 21

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of the scar according to health professional
Time Frame: at 1 month, at 3 months, at 6 months, at 12 months
The quality of the scar according to the professional will be assessed using the total POSAS (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale ) score. Score from 7 (best score) to 70 (worst score)
at 1 month, at 3 months, at 6 months, at 12 months
Scar quality according to patient
Time Frame: at 1 month, at 3 months, at 6 months, at 12 months
The quality of the scar according to the patient will be assessed using the total POSAS (patient) score. Score from 7 (best score) to 70 (worst score)
at 1 month, at 3 months, at 6 months, at 12 months
Complete healing for non-grafted patients
Time Frame: at day 21
Complete healing for non-grafted patients assessed by the number of patients with epidermization defined by total wound coverage with pink epithelium and dressing discontinuation
at day 21
Complete healing
Time Frame: at 3 months, at 6 months, at 12 months
The number of patients for whom scar healing is observed will be calculated. Scar healing is defined by: dressing discontinuation, and scar maturation (cessation of compression), and clinical follow-up discontinuation.
at 3 months, at 6 months, at 12 months
Dressing tolerance
Time Frame: at Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8
Any dressing discontinuation related to adverse events, and all tolerance events observed during the treatment period.
at Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 20, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 20, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 20, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burns Degree Second

Clinical Trials on Local treatment with silver sulphadiazine only

3
Subscribe