Efficacy of the Quell Wearable Device for Chronic Overlapping Pain Conditions

November 10, 2022 updated by: Robert N. Jamison, PhD, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Efficacy of the Quell Wearable Device for Treatment of Central Sensitization-related Pain Among Persons With Chronic Overlapping Pain Conditions

This study will examine the pain-relieving effects of a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator device called a Quell for persons with multiple chronic overlapping pain conditions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will examine the pain-relieving effects of a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator device called a Quell for persons with multiple chronic overlapping pain conditions. Participants will attend two quantitative sensory testing visits in order to determine their level of pain sensitivity, one at the beginning of the study and the second at the 3-month Follow-up session. Participants will be asked to test out the Quell device to check for sensation tolerance, and will then be randomized into one of the two treatment groups: the High Intensity Quell group or the Low Intensity Quell group. Participants will be asked to wear the device for at least 3 hours every day and to complete daily assessments, along with a total of three sets of questionnaires: one at the start of the study, the second 6 weeks from the date of consent, and the third 3 months after the date of consent. A member of the research staff will call participants once a week for a brief phone interview throughout the study. Participants will be in this study for 3 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

115

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States, 02467
        • Recruiting
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital Pain Management Center
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Robert N. Jamison, Ph.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 97 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ages 21 and older
  • Pain duration > 3 months
  • Diagnosed by physician with multiple chronic pain conditions
  • Have chronic pain related to multiple chronic pain diagnoses (headaches, joint pain, back pain, or any of the other COPCs)
  • Average 4 or greater on pain intensity scale of 0 to 10
  • Pain is not accounted for by any other progressive disease (e.g., cancer, MS)
  • Meets sensory hypersensitivity cutoffs based on QST-assessed evidence
  • Own a smartphone (iPhone or Android device) and can download the pain app (MasterMyPain) and the Quell Relief mobile app onto their device
  • Able to speak and understand English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of cancer or any other malignant disease
  • Acute osteomyelitis or acute bone disease
  • Present of past DSM-V diagnosis of schizophrenia, delusional disorder, psychotic disorder, or dissociative disorder that would be judged to interfere with study participation
  • Pregnancy
  • Any clinically unstable systemic illness judged to interfere with treatment
  • A pain condition requiring urgent surgery
  • An active substance use disorder, such as cocaine or IV heroin use that would interfere with study participation
  • Have an implanted cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, or other implanted device.
  • Reynaud's syndrome
  • Open cuts/sores

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: High Intensity Stimulation
Patients will be randomly assigned to the High Intensity Quell group and will receive higher intensity stimulation every day for 12 weeks.
Participants will receive 1 hour of continuous stimulation during each therapy session. Subjects are asked to complete a minimum of 3 sessions per day.
Sham Comparator: Low Intensity Stimulation
Patients will be randomly assigned to the Low intensity Quell group and will receive lower intensity stimulation every day for 12 weeks.
Participants will receive only three 2-minute periods of stimulation (at 0, 28, 58 minutes) during each 60-minute therapeutic session. Subjects are asked to complete a minimum of 3 sessions per day.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Brief Pain Inventory Interference Scale (BPI)
Time Frame: Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up
Measures and validates measures of pain intensity on a scale of 0-10 with higher scores meaning a worse outcome
Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Time Frame: Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up
Measures thoughts and feelings when patient is experiencing pain on a 13-item scale ranging from 0-52 with higher scores meaning a worse outcome and higher catastrophizing
Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up
Pain Disability Index (PDI)
Time Frame: Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up
Rating scales designed to measure levels of pain disability, or the degree to which pain is preventing a patient from doing what they normally would be doing, or doing it as well as they normally would on a 7-item scale of 0-10 ranging from 0-70 with higher scores meaning a worse outcome
Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up
Measures mood on a 14-item scale ranging from 0 to 42 with higher scores meaning a worse outcome
Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up
Pain Detect Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire (painDETECT)
Time Frame: Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up
Measures the presence of neuropathic pain on a scale ranging from -1 to 38 on ratings of 'never to very strongly' with higher scores meaning a worse outcome
Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up
Symptom Impact Questionnaire (SIQR)
Time Frame: Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up
Measures pain symptoms and function on a scale of 0-10 with scores ranging from 0 to-50 with higher scores meaning a worse outcome
Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up
Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up
Measures the subject's overall belief about the efficacy of treatment on a 7-point categorical verbal rating scale. The scale ranges from (1) "no change or condition has gotten worse" to (7) "a great deal better and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference.
Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up
Healthcare Utilization
Time Frame: Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up
Monthly clinic and ED visits
Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up
Satisfaction and Qualitative Questions
Time Frame: 3-month Follow-up
Overall satisfaction questions developed for this study, specifically related to use of a pain management device
3-month Follow-up
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)
Time Frame: Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up
Set of psychophysical methods used to quantify somatosensory function
Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up
The Brief Pain Inventory Pain Intensity Scale (BPI)
Time Frame: Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up
Worst, least, average and now pain on a scale of 0-10 with higher scores meaning a worse outcome
Changes from Baseline to 3-month Follow-Up
MasterMyPain App
Time Frame: Daily ratings over 3-months
Daily ratings of pain related factors on smartphone pain app on a scale of 0-10 with higher scores meaning a worse outcome
Daily ratings over 3-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert N. Jamison, Ph.D., Brigham and Women's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypersensitivity

Clinical Trials on High Intensity Quell

3
Subscribe