Impact of Deep Neuromuscular Blockade During Total Hip Replacement Surgery on Postoperative Recovery and Immune Function (HIPPO)

November 13, 2023 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

Deep Versus Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade During Total HIP Replacement Surgery to Improve POstoperative Quality of Recovery and Immune Function: a Randomized Controlled Study

Monocenter randomized controlled trial to compare the effect of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) versus moderate NMB during total hip replacement surgery on postoperative quality of recovery and innate immune function.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale: Neuromuscular blockade agents (NMB) may enable surgeons to optimize exposure during hip surgery. With an increasing depth of NMB, manipulation of muscles and adjunctive tissues may be easier, therefore reducing damage to muscles and adjunct tissues. Accumulating evidence exists that the use of deep NMB in laparoscopic surgery is associated with a better quality of recovery and lower pain scores. However, whether this accounts for open surgery is still unknown.

In addition, surgery is associated with postoperative immune suppression. Surgical stress and damage cause the release of Danger Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs). After trauma and sepsis, the release of DAMPs is associated with immune paralysis and a higher susceptibility to infectious complications. Previous research indicates that DAMPS are the origin of postoperative immune suppression. The use of deep NMB in hip surgery may reduce surgical damage and thereby lead to a better quality of recovery and secondarily a better preservation of immune cell function.

Primary objective: To establish the relationship between the use of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) versus moderate NMB and the quality of recovery after total hip replacement surgery (THR) Secondary objective: To establish the relationship between the use of deep NMB versus moderate NMB and innate immune function after THR surgery

Study design: A monocenter, blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial

Study population: adults who are scheduled for primary or secondary hip replacement surgery under general anaesthesia.

Intervention: Patients will be randomized between a deep NMB (post tetanic count (PTC) 1-2) and moderate NMB (Train-of-four (TOF) 1-2)

Primary endpoint: Quality of Recovery score (QoR-40) at postoperative day 1.

Secondary endpoints: postoperative innate immune function, QoR-40 at postoperative day 30, 30-day postoperative (infectious) complications, postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6500HB
        • Recruiting
        • Radboudumc
        • Contact:
          • Veerle Bijkerk, MD
          • Phone Number: 0031 24 361 5333
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michiel C Warlé, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age of 18 years or older
  • Scheduled for total hip replacement surgery under general anaesthesia
  • Informed consent obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Insufficient control of the Dutch language to read the patient information and to fill out de questionnaires
  • Known or suspected hypersensitivity to rocuronium or sugammadex
  • Deficiency of vitamin K dependent clotting factors or coagulopathy
  • Severe renal disease (creatinine clearance <30 ml/min), including patients on dialysis
  • Severe liver disease (Child-Pugh Classification C)
  • Known or suspected neuromuscular disorders impairing neuromuscular function
  • Women who are or may be pregnant or currently breastfeeding
  • Chronic use of psychotropic drugs
  • Use of immunomodulatory medication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Deep neuromuscular blockade
Participant will receive deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC 1-2)
Moderate NMB (TOF 1-2)
Other Names:
  • Bridion
Deep NMB (PTC 1-2)
Other Names:
  • Bridion
Active Comparator: Moderate neuromuscular blockade
Participant will receive moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Moderate NMB (TOF 1-2)
Other Names:
  • Bridion
Deep NMB (PTC 1-2)
Other Names:
  • Bridion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Recovery 40 (QoR-40) questionnaire score
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1
40 points (minimum: extremely poor quality of recovery) to 200 points (maximum: excellent quality of recovery)
Postoperative day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Recovery 40 (QoR-40) questionnaire score
Time Frame: Postoperative day 30
40 points (minimum: extremely poor quality of recovery) to 200 points (maximum: excellent quality of recovery)
Postoperative day 30
Immune function represented by serum cytokine
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1
Serum cytokine IL-6 level
Postoperative day 1
Immune function represented by IL-10
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1
Serum cytokine IL-10 level
Postoperative day 1
Immune function represented by TNF-a
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1
Serum cytokine TNF-a level
Postoperative day 1
Immune function represented by ex-vivo IL-6 production capacity
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1
Ex-vivo IL-6 production capacity upon whole blood Lipopolysaccharide(LPS) stimulation
Postoperative day 1
Immune function represented by ex-vivo IL-10 production capacity
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1
Ex-vivo IL-10 production capacity upon whole blood LPS stimulation
Postoperative day 1
Pain score by numeric pain rating (NRS) scale
Time Frame: During hospital admission up to 3 days postoperative
pain scores with NRS 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain)
During hospital admission up to 3 days postoperative
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: 30 postoperative days
postoperative complications scored by Clavien-Dindo classification; grade 0 (no deviation from ideal) grade 5 (death of patient)
30 postoperative days
Infectious postoperative complications
Time Frame: 30 postoperative days
Postoperative infectious complications scored the definitions of the StEP-COMPAC group initiative
30 postoperative days
Analgesia consumption
Time Frame: During hospital admission up to 3 days postoperative
non-cumulative and cumulative opioid use per day in morphine equivalent
During hospital admission up to 3 days postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 18, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 3, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 14, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

All data will be analyzed for publication. After that it belongs to Radboud umc where other researchers of Radboud umc may or may not include this database to their study. But there will be no active sharing

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Rocuronium Bromide

3
Subscribe