Potentiated Aminoglycosides in Postoperative Urinary Tract Infection Prophylaxis (UROPOT)

February 6, 2024 updated by: Sylvain Meylan, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Metabolic Potentiation of Aminoglycosides: a Novel Antimicrobial Strategy to Prevent Urinary Tract Infections (UROPOT TRIAL).

Urinary tract hardware such as pig-tail catheters are are frequently used for management of urolithiasis or other obstructive pathologies. They are readily colonized by urogenital flora leading to asymptomatic bacteriuria. While asymptomatic bacteriuria is not per se a problem for patients, it may lead to severe infections in the context of hardware manipulation leading to mucosal damage (e.g. catheter exchanges or stone extraction). Such interventions therefore warrant an antibiotic prophylaxis. However, bacteria rapidly form biofilms on hardware; aside of fluoroquinolones, antibiotics have limited anti-biofilm activity. Furthermore, the widespread use of antibiotics has lead to resistant strains. Hence, novel antimicrobial strategies are needed. Recently, metabolism-based potentiation of aminoglycoside has shown high antimicrobial activity against persistent forms of bacteria such as biofilms in the context of murine catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Because of the highly favorable pharmacodynamic profile of aminoglycoside in the urinary tract and the metabolic potentiation, aminoglycosides can be reduced to levels with minimal toxicity.

UROPOT aims to compare the efficacy of potentiated aminoglycoside to standard of care for (i) prophylaxis of asymptomatic bacteriuria during urinary hardware manipulations with mucosal trauma (Pig-tail catheter exchange, stone surgery with prior in-dwelling catheter, etc.) and (ii) sustained microbiological eradication through antibiofilm activity. UROPOT will compare the rate of post-interventional urinary tract infections (primary outcome). It will also assess safety and eradication potency (microbiological outcome).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

UROPOT is a randomized, single-centre, double-blind, pilot trial comparing a combination of aminoglycosides and mannitol to standard of care or aminoglycosides alone for the peri-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis of endourological procedures with mucosal trauma in the presence of hardware. Adults (≥18 years) scheduled for such procedures with mucosal trauma (stone surgery with hardware, pig-tail catheter exchanges) and having an asymptomatic bacteriuria E. coli or K. pneumoniae as identified 10 days prior to surgery, will be randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive standard prophylaxis (gen. Ceftriaxone 2 g) for 24 hours, a single dose of amikacin (6mg/kg i.v.) or a single dose of mannitol (pres. 2.5g i.v. bolus)/amikacin (3mg/kg i.v.). Sample size for the three groups will be constructed to demonstrate a non-inferiority for the clinical outcome (absence of infectious complication within 48 hours from operation) with a power of 80%. Complications in the absence of antimicrobial prophylaxis range from 2-10%. Patients will be excluded if baseline urine culture has another bacterial pathogen or E. coli or K. pneumoniae are documented to be aminoglycoside resistant. The primary endpoint will be the prevention of complications(clinical) that will be evaluated for non-inferiority compared to the accepted standard of care. i.e., within a 6% margin Assuming a rate of complication as low as 2%, the new treatments will be considered non-inferior if the corresponding rate of complication is not above 8% (i.e., 6% margin). This non-inferiority margin can be evaluated with a total for 128 patients per treatment arm, at 1-sided alpha of 5%, with power 80%, through an exact two-sample test for proportions. Two comparisons will be performed of arm A and of arm B versus standard of care (SoC). In addition, a microbiological outcome will be included to document higher biofilm eradication rate. This will be documented by sonication of extracted hardware as well as repeat urine culture at post-operative days 7 and 14 days (secondary outcomes). Safety will be monitored with a specific focus on nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. If highly efficient, this novel antimicrobial strategy would be expanded to treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Lausanne, Switzerland, 1011
        • Recruiting
        • CHUV
        • Contact:
          • Sylvain Meylan, MD-PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent
  • Adults (≥18 years)
  • Ureteral stent in situ
  • Patients scheduled for endourological ureteral manipulations (e.g. endourological stone surgery, ureteral stent exchange)
  • Asymptomatic bacteriuria with strains of E. coli and/or K. pneumoniae sensitive to Ceftriaxone and Amikacin/Aminoglycosides.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to one of the study drugs Beta-lactams, aminoglycosides or mannitol
  • Pregnant and lactating women
  • Glomerular filtration rate (CKD-EPI eGFR) < 50ml/min / 1,73m2
  • Hearing impairment
  • Myasthenia gravis or other forms of myoneural disorders
  • Congestive heart failure, Pulmonary edema
  • Intracranial hemorrhage, blood-brain barrier compromise
  • Previous (within 3 months prior to randomization) or concomitant participation in another interventional clinical trial
  • Antibiotic treatment within 14 days prior to randomization
  • Mixed cultures of E. coli and/or K. pneumonia with other bacteria
  • Inability to understand and follow the protocol
  • Inability to give informed consent
  • BMI<20 or >30

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Ceftriaxone (CRO)
Ceftriaxone infusion. Ceftriaxone is a beta-lactam antibiotic that is the standard-of-care antibiotic for prophylaxis of asymptomatic bacteriuria in Switzerland. The choice of 2000 mg delivered intravenously reflects the general practice.

Preselected patients with ureteral stents in situ who are scheduled to undergo endourological ureteral stent manipulation will have routine urine cultures prior to intervention.

Procedures: Consented patients will be randomized for the type of antibiotic prophylaxis according to a global randomization list (i.e. CRO, AMK, AMK1/2+MAN)).

Antibiotics will be delivered in a single infusion that will be administered within 30 minutes.

Active Comparator: Aminoglycoside (AMK)
Amikacin infusion Amikacin is an aminoglycoside routinely used in Australia (e.g. amikacin, gentamicin) as the standard of care for antibiotic prophylaxis for endourological treatments. It is also used globally for fever in neutropenia in hematological patients. Due to their relatively limited use, aminoglycosides have low resistance rates amongst Enterobacteriaceae. A single dose of 1000mg will be used intravenously
Preselected patients with ureteral stents in situ who are scheduled to undergo endourological ureteral stent manipulation will have routine urine cultures prior to intervention.
Experimental: AminoglycosideLD + Mannitol (AMK1/2 + MAN)
Amikacin + Mannitol combination The addition of Mannitol enhances bactericidal effect of amikacin in E.coli and K.pneumoniae in animal models and allows for a decrease of amikacin dosing. A single dose of 500mg (low dose or LD - decrease by 50%) systemic amikacin will be used intravenously in combination with 5 grams mannitol delivered intravenously.

Preselected patients with ureteral stents in situ who are scheduled to undergo endourological ureteral stent manipulation will have routine urine cultures prior to intervention.

Procedures: Consented patients will be randomized for the type of antibiotic prophylaxis according to a global randomization list (i.e. CRO, AMK, AMK1/2+MAN)).

Antibiotics (± mannitol) will be delivered in a single infusion that will be administered within 30 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Infection prophylaxis
Time Frame: 48 hours postoperatively
Incidence of postoperative infections within the initial 48 hours postoperatively.
48 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Combined microbiological eradication
Time Frame: 6-8 hours post infusion
anti-biofilm activity as determined by culture of sonicated catheter (CFU/ml) and intraoperative urine culture (CFU/ml)
6-8 hours post infusion
Sustained microbiological eradication
Time Frame: Up to 2 weeks
To document eradication of bacteriuria at postoperative day 2 and 14 day by urine culture (CFU/ml)
Up to 2 weeks
Surgical safety outcome
Time Frame: Day 0-14
Postoperative complications
Day 0-14
Pharmacokinetics outcome
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 2, Day 14
Measurements of maximum urine drug concentrations (Amikacin, Ceftriaxone, Mannitol)
Day 0, Day 2, Day 14
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Time Frame: Day 0-Day 14
Safety and tolerability of Amikacin/Mannitol combination (serious adverse events (SAEs), pre-specified adverse events (AEs) of special interest (ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity).
Day 0-Day 14

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sylvain Meylan, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 16, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Tract Infections

Clinical Trials on Ceftriaxon

3
Subscribe