- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05767073
LIVES: Personalized Lifestyle Intervention for Patients With Depression (LIVES)
LIVES: Development of/a Personalized Lifestyle Intervention for Patients With Depression in Psychiatric Outpatient Care and General Practice in a Pilot Study
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Rationale: Patients with bipolar disorder and severe depressions have a 10-year shorter life expectancy, on average, than the population as a whole. Also patients with less severe depression are still at a substantially increased risk of cardiovascular events. This may be attributed primarily to somatic complications resulting from a largely sedentary existence and an unhealthy lifestyle related to their disorder and/or the side effects of psychopharmacological treatment. Generally speaking, multimodal lifestyle interventions are about as effective as medication in reducing cardiovascular risks. Very little research has been conducted into the effect of lifestyle interventions among outpatients in mental health care or patients with mental health problems in general practice. This study seeks to examine the extent to which a personalised lifestyle approach can promote the physical health and quality of life of outpatients and general practice patients with affective disorders.
Objective: The objective of this study is to develop a personalised state-of-the art lifestyle intervention that is both feasible and acceptable to outpatients with bipolar and severe recurrent depressive disorder and to patients with depression in general practice Study design: An explorative pilot study (n = 38) with baseline measurement and different follow-up measurements during and after the intervention.
Study population: Patients (18-65 years old) with bipolar disorder or severe recurrent depression who are being treated at GGZ Drenthe (N=30) and patients with depression in primary care (N=8).
Intervention (if applicable): A personalised multimodal lifestyle intervention consisting of several modules comprising both individual and group sessions. The support network is involved during the individual sessions.
Main study parameters/endpoints: Feasibility and acceptability of the lifestyle intervention.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Huibert Burger, MD PhD
- Phone Number: 6722 +31(0)50 361 6722
- Email: h.burger@umcg.nl
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Edith Liemburg, PhD
- Phone Number: 9718 +31 6 10589718
- Email: e.j.liemburg@umcg.nl
Study Locations
-
-
-
Groningen, Netherlands, 9700 AD
- Recruiting
- University Medical Center Groningen
-
Contact:
- Huibert Burger, MD PhD
- Phone Number: 6724 +31(0)50 361 6724
- Email: h.burger@umcg.nl
-
Contact:
- Patrick Brink
- Phone Number: +31 6 52724353
- Email: p.brink@umcg.nl
-
Principal Investigator:
- Marjolein Berger, MD PHD
-
-
Drenthe
-
Assen, Drenthe, Netherlands, 9404 LA
- Recruiting
- GGZ Drenthe
-
Contact:
- Danielle Cath, MD PhD
- Phone Number: 3069 +31 6 82843069
- Email: danielle.cath@ggzdrenthe.nl
-
Contact:
- Edith Liemburg, PhD
- Phone Number: +31 6 10589718
- Email: e.j.liemburg@umcg.nl
-
Principal Investigator:
- Danielle Cath, MD PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
For patients in mental health care only:
- Outpatients
- Diagnosed during intake, the primary diagnosis being chronic bipolar disorder (type I or 2) or a chronic or recurrent severe depression in the narrower sense of the word
- Receiving psychopharmacological treatment
- Have had a physical and lifestyle Routine Outcome Monitoring measurement showing that three or more metabolic parameters were outside the normal range
For patients in general practice (GP) only:
- Diagnosis of depressive symptoms or depressive disorder in the past year as registered in the general practice electronic health record and coded according to the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) as P03 and P76, respectively,
- At least mild depressive symptom level according to the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI) (score ≥14)
- Body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2 or increased waist circumference (>88cm (women) of >102cm (men)).
For both patient groups:
- 18 years or older and capable to participate in the intervention according to the treating physician Availability of one or two people close to the patient (friends or family, preferably sharing the same household), i.e. to act as the buddy of the patient.
Exclusion Criteria:
- For GP patients only: current treatment in mental health care (GGZ in Dutch)
- For GP patients only: severe somatic / neurological disease at the discretion of the GP
- Currently participating in another lifestyle intervention
- Insufficient proficiency in Dutch
- Unability to read and write
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Intervention
Lifestyle intervention
|
The lifestyle intervention Coaching on Lifestyle (CooL) (van Rinsum 2018)),formed the basis of LIVE and was adapted to specific dysfunctional elements in depressed patients regarding motivation and self-management. The focus is on reducing depressive symptoms, enhancing the quality of life and possibly achieving weight loss. The lifestyle intervention lasts six months, with 13 weekly 1.5 to 2 hour group sessions and five 45 to 60 -minute individual sessions with at least one person from the patient's support network of friends or family (preferably sharing the same household). All sessions end with individual homework exercises, and each session starts with a 10 to 15-minute positive psychology intervention (PPI) and 5 to 15 minutes of physical activity. These sessions are followed by two booster sessions after about two and six months. Groups consist of 4-8 people. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Reach of LIVE
Time Frame: 27 months (September 2020 through November 2022)
|
Reach of our intervention as defined by the absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of individuals who are willing to participate in LIVE
|
27 months (September 2020 through November 2022)
|
Adherence to LIVE
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
Adherence to the LIVE lifestyle intervention as defined by the number of sessions attended by the participant out of the total of 18 sessions
|
18 weeks
|
Drop out from LIVE
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
Drop-out from the LIVE intervention as defined by the proportion of participants who decide to prematurely stop taking part in the LIVE intervention
|
18 weeks
|
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 3
|
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention will be assessed using qualitative interviews Participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention.
A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
|
Up to week 3
|
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 6
|
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention will be assessed using qualitative interviews Participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention.
A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
|
Up to week 6
|
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 9
|
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention will be assessed using qualitative interviews Participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention.
A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
|
Up to week 9
|
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 12
|
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention will be assessed using qualitative interviews Participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention.
A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
|
Up to week 12
|
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 15
|
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention will be assessed using qualitative interviews Participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention.
A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
|
Up to week 15
|
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 18
|
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention will be assessed using qualitative interviews Participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention.
A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
|
Up to week 18
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the buddy of the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 3
|
Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed using qualitative interviews.
Buddies of participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention.
A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
|
Up to week 3
|
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the buddy of the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 6
|
Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed using qualitative interviews.
Buddies of participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention.
A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
|
Up to week 6
|
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the buddy of the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 9
|
Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed using qualitative interviews.
Buddies of participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention.
A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
|
Up to week 9
|
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the buddy of the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 12
|
Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed using qualitative interviews.
Buddies of participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention.
A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
|
Up to week 12
|
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the buddy of the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 15
|
Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed using qualitative interviews.
Buddies of participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention.
A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
|
Up to week 15
|
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the buddy of the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 18
|
Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed using qualitative interviews.
Buddies of participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention.
A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
|
Up to week 18
|
Quality of life as assessed by The Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA).
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention 18 weeks after baseline, and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
The MANSA measures quality of life focusing on satisfaction with life as a whole and with life domains and consists of a 12-item self-report questionnaire
|
Baseline, at the end of the intervention 18 weeks after baseline, and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Depressive symptoms according to the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
The BDI-II is a self-report (21 items) rating inventory which measures depressive symptom level
|
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Recovery of the participant according to the Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter (I.ROC)
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
The I.ROC is an instrument to quantitatively measure recovery.
It uses three indicators on four areas of wellbeing, namely home, opportunity, people, empowerment.
|
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Wellbeing as assessed by the Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF)
Time Frame: Baseline, halfway and at the end of the intervention 18 weeks after the intervention, and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
The MHC-SF measures emotional, social and psychological wellbeing and is a self-report with 14 items
|
Baseline, halfway and at the end of the intervention 18 weeks after the intervention, and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Sleep quality as assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
The PSQI is a self-report questionnaire that assesses sleep quality over a one-month interval and consists of 19 individual items.
|
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems according to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification test (AUDIT)
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
The AUDIT consists of 10 items scoring both consumption and alcohol-related problems.
We will use the total scale on consumption and problem drinking
|
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Treatment success according to the Outcome Questionnaire-45
Time Frame: The questionnaire will be administered after every five modules of the intervention.
|
a questionnaire to measure treatment success.
It has three subscales: 1. Symptomatic distress (25 items, including symptoms of depression, anxiety and drug dependency, 2. Interpersonal relations (11 items) en 3. Social Role (9 items) .
|
The questionnaire will be administered after every five modules of the intervention.
|
Activity level defined as the daily number of steps
Time Frame: From baseline up to the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
The daily number of steps will be measured using the Fitbit Zip as described by Naslund et al., 2016
|
From baseline up to the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Body height of the participant as assessed by a stadiometer
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Body height in meters
|
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Body weight of the participant as assessed by a medical weight scale
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Body weight in kilograms
|
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Waist circumference of the participant as assessed using a tape meter line
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Waist circumference in centimeters
|
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Dietary intake of the participant according to a self devised questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
The questionnaire is a nutrition list with 25 items to measure the dietary intake of patients
|
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Danielle Cath, MD PhD, University Medical Center Groningen
- Principal Investigator: Marjolein Berger, MD PhD, University Medical Center Groningen
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ormel J, Von Korff M, Burger H, Scott K, Demyttenaere K, Huang YQ, Posada-Villa J, Pierre Lepine J, Angermeyer MC, Levinson D, de Girolamo G, Kawakami N, Karam E, Medina-Mora ME, Gureje O, Williams D, Haro JM, Bromet EJ, Alonso J, Kessler R. Mental disorders among persons with heart disease - results from World Mental Health surveys. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007 Jul-Aug;29(4):325-34. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.03.009.
- Knol MJ, Heerdink ER, Egberts AC, Geerlings MI, Gorter KJ, Numans ME, Grobbee DE, Klungel OH, Burger H. Depressive symptoms in subjects with diagnosed and undiagnosed type 2 diabetes. Psychosom Med. 2007 May;69(4):300-5. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31805f48b9. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 11178 (DAIDS ES Registry Number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Risk
-
University of Split, School of MedicineCompletedCardiovascular Risk Factor | Lifestyle Risk ReductionCroatia
-
University of Southern DenmarkRegion of Southern Denmark; Odense Patient Data Explorative Network; ENIGMA Solutions... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingCardiovascular Risk Factor | Risk CommunicationDenmark
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonTerminatedHigh Cardiovascular Risk Patients | Low Cardiovascular Risk PatientsFrance
-
Universidad Católica San Antonio de MurciaCompleted
-
University of PittsburghAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)CompletedCardiovascular RiskUnited States
-
Uppsala UniversityCompletedCardiovascular Risk Factor | Lifestyle Risk Reduction | Primary Care
-
Mayo ClinicEnrolling by invitationCardiovascular Risk | Cardiovascular PreventionUnited States
-
Universiti Putra MalaysiaBeacon Hospital Sdn BhdNot yet recruiting
-
Universidad Católica San Antonio de MurciaCompletedTo Evaluate the Efficacy of a Nutraceutical in Reducing Cardiovascular Risk in Healthy Subjects (JC)Cardiovascular RiskSpain
-
University of DundeeUniversity of St AndrewsCompletedCardiovascular Risk
Clinical Trials on Lifestyle InterVEntion (LIVE)
-
Leiden University Medical CenterMedical Center Haaglanden; Voeding LeeftActive, not recruitingFatigue | Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesNetherlands
-
Sheba Medical CenterD-Cure, Israel; Chief Scientist, The Israel Ministry of ScienceCompleted
-
Baylor College of MedicineNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); Michael... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruiting
-
Northwestern UniversityNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)CompletedHyperglycemia | Glucose Metabolism Disorders | Metabolic Diseases | Obesity | Diabetes Mellitus | Endocrine System Diseases | Overnutrition | Nutrition Disorders | Overweight | Body Weight | Signs and SymptomsUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); The Methodist Hospital Research...Recruiting
-
Laval UniversityActive, not recruitingPhysical Activity | Weight Loss | Dietary Modification | BreastfeedingCanada
-
University of AdelaideCompletedInsulin Resistance | Type 2 DiabetesAustralia
-
Molde University CollegeNorwegian Labour and Welfare AdministrationCompletedObesity | Morbid Obesity | Work Related Illnesses | Life Style | Sick-leave
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedObesityUnited States
-
DongGuk UniversityNational Research Foundation of KoreaUnknown