LIVES: Personalized Lifestyle Intervention for Patients With Depression (LIVES)

January 22, 2024 updated by: University Medical Center Groningen

LIVES: Development of/a Personalized Lifestyle Intervention for Patients With Depression in Psychiatric Outpatient Care and General Practice in a Pilot Study

Persons with affective disorder have a considerably increased risk of cardiovascular disease. To a considerable extent, this is due to an unhealthy life style. At present, no adequate lifestyle interventions are available for these patients. In the present pilot intervention study we study the acceptability and feasibility of a newly developed lifestyle intervention that is specifically tailored to the needs of patients with affective disorders treated in mental health care or general practice.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale: Patients with bipolar disorder and severe depressions have a 10-year shorter life expectancy, on average, than the population as a whole. Also patients with less severe depression are still at a substantially increased risk of cardiovascular events. This may be attributed primarily to somatic complications resulting from a largely sedentary existence and an unhealthy lifestyle related to their disorder and/or the side effects of psychopharmacological treatment. Generally speaking, multimodal lifestyle interventions are about as effective as medication in reducing cardiovascular risks. Very little research has been conducted into the effect of lifestyle interventions among outpatients in mental health care or patients with mental health problems in general practice. This study seeks to examine the extent to which a personalised lifestyle approach can promote the physical health and quality of life of outpatients and general practice patients with affective disorders.

Objective: The objective of this study is to develop a personalised state-of-the art lifestyle intervention that is both feasible and acceptable to outpatients with bipolar and severe recurrent depressive disorder and to patients with depression in general practice Study design: An explorative pilot study (n = 38) with baseline measurement and different follow-up measurements during and after the intervention.

Study population: Patients (18-65 years old) with bipolar disorder or severe recurrent depression who are being treated at GGZ Drenthe (N=30) and patients with depression in primary care (N=8).

Intervention (if applicable): A personalised multimodal lifestyle intervention consisting of several modules comprising both individual and group sessions. The support network is involved during the individual sessions.

Main study parameters/endpoints: Feasibility and acceptability of the lifestyle intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

38

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Huibert Burger, MD PhD
  • Phone Number: 6722 +31(0)50 361 6722
  • Email: h.burger@umcg.nl

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Groningen, Netherlands, 9700 AD
        • Recruiting
        • University Medical Center Groningen
        • Contact:
          • Huibert Burger, MD PhD
          • Phone Number: 6724 +31(0)50 361 6724
          • Email: h.burger@umcg.nl
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marjolein Berger, MD PHD
    • Drenthe
      • Assen, Drenthe, Netherlands, 9404 LA
        • Recruiting
        • GGZ Drenthe
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Danielle Cath, MD PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

For patients in mental health care only:

  • Outpatients
  • Diagnosed during intake, the primary diagnosis being chronic bipolar disorder (type I or 2) or a chronic or recurrent severe depression in the narrower sense of the word
  • Receiving psychopharmacological treatment
  • Have had a physical and lifestyle Routine Outcome Monitoring measurement showing that three or more metabolic parameters were outside the normal range

For patients in general practice (GP) only:

  • Diagnosis of depressive symptoms or depressive disorder in the past year as registered in the general practice electronic health record and coded according to the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) as P03 and P76, respectively,
  • At least mild depressive symptom level according to the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI) (score ≥14)
  • Body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2 or increased waist circumference (>88cm (women) of >102cm (men)).

For both patient groups:

- 18 years or older and capable to participate in the intervention according to the treating physician Availability of one or two people close to the patient (friends or family, preferably sharing the same household), i.e. to act as the buddy of the patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • For GP patients only: current treatment in mental health care (GGZ in Dutch)
  • For GP patients only: severe somatic / neurological disease at the discretion of the GP
  • Currently participating in another lifestyle intervention
  • Insufficient proficiency in Dutch
  • Unability to read and write

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Lifestyle intervention

The lifestyle intervention Coaching on Lifestyle (CooL) (van Rinsum 2018)),formed the basis of LIVE and was adapted to specific dysfunctional elements in depressed patients regarding motivation and self-management.

The focus is on reducing depressive symptoms, enhancing the quality of life and possibly achieving weight loss.

The lifestyle intervention lasts six months, with 13 weekly 1.5 to 2 hour group sessions and five 45 to 60 -minute individual sessions with at least one person from the patient's support network of friends or family (preferably sharing the same household). All sessions end with individual homework exercises, and each session starts with a 10 to 15-minute positive psychology intervention (PPI) and 5 to 15 minutes of physical activity. These sessions are followed by two booster sessions after about two and six months. Groups consist of 4-8 people.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reach of LIVE
Time Frame: 27 months (September 2020 through November 2022)
Reach of our intervention as defined by the absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of individuals who are willing to participate in LIVE
27 months (September 2020 through November 2022)
Adherence to LIVE
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Adherence to the LIVE lifestyle intervention as defined by the number of sessions attended by the participant out of the total of 18 sessions
18 weeks
Drop out from LIVE
Time Frame: 18 weeks
Drop-out from the LIVE intervention as defined by the proportion of participants who decide to prematurely stop taking part in the LIVE intervention
18 weeks
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 3
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention will be assessed using qualitative interviews Participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention. A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
Up to week 3
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 6
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention will be assessed using qualitative interviews Participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention. A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
Up to week 6
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 9
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention will be assessed using qualitative interviews Participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention. A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
Up to week 9
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 12
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention will be assessed using qualitative interviews Participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention. A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
Up to week 12
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 15
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention will be assessed using qualitative interviews Participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention. A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
Up to week 15
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 18
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention will be assessed using qualitative interviews Participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention. A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
Up to week 18

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the buddy of the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 3
Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed using qualitative interviews. Buddies of participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention. A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
Up to week 3
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the buddy of the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 6
Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed using qualitative interviews. Buddies of participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention. A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
Up to week 6
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the buddy of the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 9
Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed using qualitative interviews. Buddies of participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention. A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
Up to week 9
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the buddy of the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 12
Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed using qualitative interviews. Buddies of participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention. A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
Up to week 12
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the buddy of the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 15
Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed using qualitative interviews. Buddies of participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention. A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
Up to week 15
Feasibility and acceptability of the LIVE intervention according to the buddy of the participant as assessed by qualitative interviews and qualitative data analysis
Time Frame: Up to week 18
Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed using qualitative interviews. Buddies of participants will be interrogated on how they experienced themes during the different modules of the intervention. A topic-list will be used by the interviewer to check whether all relevant themes on feasibility and acceptability have been discussed
Up to week 18
Quality of life as assessed by The Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA).
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention 18 weeks after baseline, and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
The MANSA measures quality of life focusing on satisfaction with life as a whole and with life domains and consists of a 12-item self-report questionnaire
Baseline, at the end of the intervention 18 weeks after baseline, and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Depressive symptoms according to the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
The BDI-II is a self-report (21 items) rating inventory which measures depressive symptom level
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Recovery of the participant according to the Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter (I.ROC)
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
The I.ROC is an instrument to quantitatively measure recovery. It uses three indicators on four areas of wellbeing, namely home, opportunity, people, empowerment.
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Wellbeing as assessed by the Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF)
Time Frame: Baseline, halfway and at the end of the intervention 18 weeks after the intervention, and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
The MHC-SF measures emotional, social and psychological wellbeing and is a self-report with 14 items
Baseline, halfway and at the end of the intervention 18 weeks after the intervention, and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Sleep quality as assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
The PSQI is a self-report questionnaire that assesses sleep quality over a one-month interval and consists of 19 individual items.
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems according to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification test (AUDIT)
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
The AUDIT consists of 10 items scoring both consumption and alcohol-related problems. We will use the total scale on consumption and problem drinking
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Treatment success according to the Outcome Questionnaire-45
Time Frame: The questionnaire will be administered after every five modules of the intervention.
a questionnaire to measure treatment success. It has three subscales: 1. Symptomatic distress (25 items, including symptoms of depression, anxiety and drug dependency, 2. Interpersonal relations (11 items) en 3. Social Role (9 items) .
The questionnaire will be administered after every five modules of the intervention.
Activity level defined as the daily number of steps
Time Frame: From baseline up to the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
The daily number of steps will be measured using the Fitbit Zip as described by Naslund et al., 2016
From baseline up to the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Body height of the participant as assessed by a stadiometer
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Body height in meters
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Body weight of the participant as assessed by a medical weight scale
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Body weight in kilograms
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Waist circumference of the participant as assessed using a tape meter line
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Waist circumference in centimeters
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
Dietary intake of the participant according to a self devised questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)
The questionnaire is a nutrition list with 25 items to measure the dietary intake of patients
Baseline, at the end of the intervention (18 weeks), and at the 6 months follow up (42 weeks after baseline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Danielle Cath, MD PhD, University Medical Center Groningen
  • Principal Investigator: Marjolein Berger, MD PhD, University Medical Center Groningen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 24, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Risk

Clinical Trials on Lifestyle InterVEntion (LIVE)

3
Subscribe