A Multi-Center, Open-label Study Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of a Dual Skincare Regimen Treatment for Facial Hyperpigmentation and Photodamaged Skin in Patients Exposed to Extrinsic Factors of Aging

June 15, 2022 updated by: Revision Skincare

A Multi-Center Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability for Treatment of Facial Hyperpigmentation and Photodamaged Skin With a Dual Regimen Treatment Containing Vitamin C and a Tinted SPF 45 Moisturizer

This open-label, multi-center clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the dual skincare regimen of vitamin C serum and moisturizing sunscreen SPF 45 to improve facial hyperpigmentation and photodamage after 12 weeks of twice daily use in healthy female subjects between 35 - 60 years old. A total of 33 subjects completed study participation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This open-label, multi-center clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the dual skincare regimen of vitamin C serum and moisturizing sunscreen SPF 45 to improve facial hyperpigmentation and photodamage when used twice daily over the course of 12 weeks by healthy women with Fitzpatrick skin type I - V, moderate to severe global face hyperpigmentation and moderate global face photodamage.

Efficacy and tolerability will be assessed through clinical grading at baseline, weeks 4, 8 and 12. Efficacy evaluation for hyperpigmentation (mottled), hyperpigmentation (discrete), overall photodamage, clarity/brightness, overall appearance, skin tone evenness (redness), fine lines and wrinkles. Investigator and subject tolerability, self-assessment questionnaire and clinical VISIA photography will be completed at baseline, weeks 4, 8 and 12. Subject testimonials will be completed at week 12.

A total of 33 subjects completed study participation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Solana Beach, California, United States, 92075
        • Art of Skin MD
    • Colorado
      • Greenwood Village, Colorado, United States, 80111
        • About Skin
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
        • Brian S. Biesman, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women between the ages of 35 and 60 years old.
  • Women with Fitzpatrick skin type I-V.
  • Subjects must have moderate to severe global face hyperpigmentation.
  • Subjects must have moderate global face photodamage.
  • Subjects must have no known medical conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, may interfere with study participation.
  • Subjects must be willing to provide verbal understanding and written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects which had a health condition and/or pre-existent dormant dermatological disease on the face.
  • Subjects that are unwilling to comply with the protocol.
  • Female subjects who are pregnant, breast feeding, or planning a pregnancy.
  • Subjects who have demonstrated a previous hypersensitivity reaction to any of the ingredients of the study products.
  • Subjects who have a history of skin cancer.
  • Subjects who have observable suntan, sunburn, scars, nevi, tattoo, excess hair, etc. or other dermatological condition on the face that might influence the test results in the opinion of the investigator.
  • Subjects who have routinely used any anti-aging, anti-wrinkles, antioxidants treatments and skin-firming products less than 30 days prior to the study entry.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Vitamin C Serum and Moisturizing Sunscreen SPF 45

Dual Regimen:

Vitamin C Serum Tinted Moisturizing Sunscreen SPF 45

Gentle cleansing lotion to be used by study participants twice daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in clinical efficacy of hyperpigmentation versus Baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks

The primary efficacy endpoint will be the Investigator Clinical Grading using Modified Griffith's 10-point Scale. A change in scores at week 4, week 8 and week 12 in comparison to baseline indicates an improvement for the indicated parameter.

Global facial hyperpigmentation will be assessed on each subject's face using a modified Griffiths' 10-point scale according to the following numerical definitions (half-point scores may be used as necessary to more accurately describe the skin condition): 0 = none (best possible condition); 1 to 3 = mild; 4 to 6 = moderate;7 to 9 = severe (worst possible condition). The lower the score equates to the best possible outcome.

12 weeks
Lack of Significant Increase in Objective Investigator Tolerability Parameters at week 4, 8, 12 compared to Baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks

The primary tolerability endpoint will be favorable analysis of the Investigator Tolerability Assessment of Erythema, Edema and Dryness. A change in scores or lack of significant change at week 4, week 8 and week 12 in comparison to Baseline indicates tolerability/safety of the test material. Four point scale with a lower score indicating a better outcome.

Example for Erythema:

0 = None No erythema of the treatment area, 1 = Mild Slight, but definite redness of the treatment area, 2 = Moderate Definite redness of the treatment area, 3 = Severe Marked redness of the treatment area

12 weeks
Incidence and severity of adverse events
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The primary safety endpoint will be determined by the incidence and severity of adverse events in healthy subjects through-out the length of the study.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in clinical efficacy of photodamage versus Baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks

The secondary efficacy endpoint will be the Investigator Clinical Grading using Modified Griffith's 10-point Scale. A change in scores at week 4, week 8 and week 12 in comparison to baseline indicates an improvement for the indicated parameter.

Global facial photodamage will be assessed on each subject's face using a modified Griffiths' 10-point scale according to the following numerical definitions (half-point scores may be used as necessary to more accurately describe the skin condition): 0 = none (best possible condition); 1 to 3 = mild; 4 to 6 = moderate;7 to 9 = severe (worst possible condition). The lower the score equates to the best possible outcome.

12 weeks
Lack of Significant Increase in Objective Subject Tolerability Parameters at week 4, 8, 12
Time Frame: 12 weeks

The primary tolerability endpoint will be favorable analysis of the Subject Tolerability Assessment of Erythema, Edema and Dryness. A change in scores or lack of significant change at week 4, week 8 and week 12 in comparison to Baseline indicates tolerability/safety of the test material. Four point scale with a lower score indicating a better outcome.

Example for Erythema: Erythema

0=None No erythema of the treatment area,1=Mild Slight, but definite redness of the treatment area, 2=Moderate Definite redness of the treatment area, 3=Severe Marked redness of the treatment area

12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 17, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 10, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 10, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RS-2020-04

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hyperpigmentation

Clinical Trials on Gentle Cleansing Lotion, Revision Skincare

3
Subscribe