POCUS and Respiratory Failure Prognosis Based on Diaphragmatic Dysfunction

May 11, 2023 updated by: Carmine Cristiano Di Gioia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena

The Impact of Point-of-care Ultrasound (POCUS) on the Prognosis of Respiratory Failure in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department Based on Diaphragmatic Dysfunction

This study aims to evaluate the use of POCUS to assess diaphragmatic function and its association with clinical outcomes in patients with respiratory failure who are admitted to the emergency department.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Respiratory failure is a common condition that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment in the emergency department. Diaphragmatic dysfunction (DD) is a potential contributor to respiratory failure, but it is often underdiagnosed and undertreated. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a non-invasive and feasible tool that can measure diaphragmatic function using parameters such as diaphragm excursion and diaphragm shortening fraction (DSF). However, the prognostic value of POCUS for DD in patients with respiratory failure is unclear.

This study is a prospective observational cohort study that will enroll consecutive patients with respiratory failure who are admitted to the emergency department of a tertiary hospital. All patients will undergo POCUS examination of the diaphragm within 6 hours of admission by trained emergency physicians. The primary outcome will be the composite of mortality, intubation, or noninvasive ventilation failure within 30 days of admission. The secondary outcomes will include length of hospital stay, intensive care unit admission, and ventilator-free days. The association between POCUS parameters of diaphragmatic function and clinical outcomes will be analyzed using multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

432

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients (≥18 years old) with respiratory failure who are admitted to the emergency department

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Respiratory failure defined as one or more of the following: respiratory rate >24 breaths/min, oxygen saturation <90% on room air, PaO2/FiO2 ratio <300 mmHg, or need for supplemental oxygen
  • Ability to provide informed consent or availability of a legal representative

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • History of thoracic surgery or trauma
  • Known neuromuscular disease affecting the diaphragm
  • Contraindications for POCUS examination such as chest wall deformity, subcutaneous emphysema, or skin infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients with Diaphragmatic dysfunction (DD)
Patients with diaphragmatic dysfunction measured by point-of-care ultrasound using the diaphragm shortening fraction (DSF) method, which resulted in values lower than 10%. DSF is calculated by the formula: diaphragmatic thickness at the end of inspiration - diaphragmatic thickness at the end of expiration/diaphragmatic thickness at the end of expiration×100
A noninvasive and feasible method to assess diaphragmatic function and predict the prognosis of patients with respiratory failure presenting to the emergency department. The method consists of measuring the diaphragmatic thickness at the end of inspiration and expiration using a linear probe placed in the subcostal region and calculating the percentage of change using the formula: diaphragmatic thickness at the end of inspiration - diaphragmatic thickness at the end of expiration/diaphragmatic thickness at the end of expiration×100. A value lower than 10% indicates diaphragmatic dysfunction and a higher risk of adverse outcomes.
Patients without Diaphragmatic dysfunction (DD)
Patients without diaphragmatic dysfunction measured by point-of-care ultrasound using the DSF method, which resulted in values higher than 10%.
A noninvasive and feasible method to assess diaphragmatic function and predict the prognosis of patients with respiratory failure presenting to the emergency department. The method consists of measuring the diaphragmatic thickness at the end of inspiration and expiration using a linear probe placed in the subcostal region and calculating the percentage of change using the formula: diaphragmatic thickness at the end of inspiration - diaphragmatic thickness at the end of expiration/diaphragmatic thickness at the end of expiration×100. A value lower than 10% indicates diaphragmatic dysfunction and a higher risk of adverse outcomes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Composite of mortality, intubation, or noninvasive ventilation failure within 30 days of admission
Time Frame: Patients will be followed up for a maximum of 1 months from admission to the emergency department, until discharge or death
Patients will be followed up for a maximum of 1 months from admission to the emergency department, until discharge or death

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Failure

Clinical Trials on Diaphragm shortening fraction measurement by point-of-care ultrasound.

3
Subscribe