A Study of LY8888AX in Participants Using a Connected Insulin Management Platform

October 23, 2025 updated by: Eli Lilly and Company

Assessment of Participant Adherence and Glucose Control While Using a Connected Insulin Management Platform

The main purpose of this study is to assess participant adherence and glucose control while using a connected insulin management platform. Approximately 50 participants will be enrolled in each country.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Besançon, France, 25030
        • CHU de Besancon Hopital Jean Minjoz
      • Corbeil-Essonnes, France, 91100
        • Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien-Pharmacie
      • Grenoble Cédex 9, France, 38043
        • Chu de Grenoble
      • Lyon, France, 69008
        • CHU de Lyon
      • Marseille, France, 13005
        • CHU - l'Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille
      • Nice, France, 6202
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice - Hôpital l'Archet
      • Vénissieux, France, 69200
        • Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste Les Portes du Sud
    • Alsace
      • Strasbourg, Alsace, France, 67098
        • CHU Strasbourg-Hautepierre
    • Cedex 9
      • Caen, Cedex 9, France, 14033
        • CHU de Caen Hopital Cote de Nacre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have been diagnosed (clinically) with T1D for at least 1 year or are patients with T2D on basal bolus insulin therapy for at least 6 months
  • HbA1c ≥8% as confirmed by point-of-care test at screening
  • Are currently using the Dexcom G6 CGM or agree to start using the Dexcom G6 during the study and agree to switch to Glooko RMA
  • Are currently using Humalog ® insulin or another rapid acting insulin analogue (e.g., Apidra® , or Novorapid ® ) and agree to switch to study-provided Humalog mealtime insulin for duration of trial
  • Have been prescribed ≥3 doses of bolus insulin per day
  • Must be taking a stable insulin dose regimen (per investigator's judgement) for at least 3 months preceding study screening
  • Have in-home refrigeration for storage of insulin

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previously used the Glooko RMA and/or Dexcom G6 CGM and were judged by the investigator to be non-adherent
  • Have participated, within the last 30 days, in a clinical study involving an investigational product. If the previous investigational product has a long half-life, 5 half-lives or 30 days (whichever is longer) should have passed
  • Have previously used or have been using an approved or investigational connected pen system within the 3 months prior to screening
  • Are currently breastfeeding, pregnant, or plan to become pregnant during the next 4-6 months
  • Are on ultra-rapid insulin (e.g., Fiasp or Lyumjev) or rapid acting human insulin (i.e., Humulin) for previous 3 months, at the time of screening
  • Are currently undergoing dialysis treatment or have any other medical condition which may preclude them from participating in this trial as per the investigator's judgement
  • Have vision loss or vision impairment that does not allow recognition of Glooko RMA screen features

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Humalog Tempo Pen With CGM Monitoring

Study Period 1: Weeks 1 to 6

  • Participants used a Sponsor-provided Humalog Tempo Pen with Tempo Smart Button (TSB), Dexcom G6 continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and the Glooko Research Mobile App (RMA) to share insulin dose and timing data with healthcare providers (HCPs) via the Glooko HCP platform. Mealtime insulin data was masked to participants but visible to HCPs. Participants followed their usual insulin regimen and lifestyle, manually logged basal insulin and activities in the app. After 6 weeks, data was unmasked and reviewed with HCPs.

Study Period 2: Weeks 7 to 18

  • Participants used the Humalog Tempo Pen with TSB, Dexcom G6 CGM, and Glooko RMA study app for 12 weeks. Insulin dose and timing data was unmasked and visible to both participants and HCPs via the Glooko RMA and HCP platform. Participants regularly upload CGM and pen data. HCPs monitor adherence and follow up as needed to ensure data transfer and CGM use.
As prescribed.
Other Names:
  • Humalog Tempo Pen
Attached to the Tempo Pen
Continuous glucose monitor
Installed on a study provided android phone.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Missed Bolus Doses (MBDs) Per Week
Time Frame: Study Period 1: Week 6 ; Study Period 2: Week 18
Missed bolus dose is defined as no insulin dose from 1 hour prior to through 1 hour after the start of a glucose excursion (meal), where a glucose excursion was defined as a greater than (>) 70 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (>3.9 millimoles per liter [mmol/L]) rise within 2 hours, not preceded by a value <70 mg/dL (<3.9 mmol/L).
Study Period 1: Week 6 ; Study Period 2: Week 18

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Time in Blood Glucose (BG) Range 70 to 180 mg/dL Captured by Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)
Time Frame: Study Period 1: Week 6; Study Period 2: Week 18
Study Period 1: Week 6; Study Period 2: Week 18
Percentage of Time in Hyperglycemic Range of >180 mg/dL and >250 mg/dL Captured by CGM
Time Frame: Study Period 1: Week 6; Study Period 2: Week 18
Study Period 1: Week 6; Study Period 2: Week 18
Percentage of Time in Hypoglycemic Range <54 mg/dL and 54 to 69 mg/dL Captured by CGM
Time Frame: Study Period 1: Week 6; Study Period 2: Week 18
Study Period 1: Week 6; Study Period 2: Week 18
Coefficient of Variation for Glucose
Time Frame: Study Period 1: Week 6; Study Period 2: Week 18
Study Period 1: Week 6; Study Period 2: Week 18
Mean Glucose as Measured by CGM
Time Frame: Study Period 1: Week 6; Study Period 2: Week 18
Study Period 1: Week 6; Study Period 2: Week 18
Number of Mistimed Bolus Dose Per Week
Time Frame: Study Period 1: Week 6 ; Study Period 2: Week 18
A mistimed bolus dose is defined as a bolus dose administered from the start of a glucose excursion up to 1 hour after the start of glucose excursion and before the peak of glucose excursion.
Study Period 1: Week 6 ; Study Period 2: Week 18
Total Insulin Dose Per Day
Time Frame: Study Period 1: Week 6; Study Period 2: Weeks 18
Study Period 1: Week 6; Study Period 2: Weeks 18
Number of Correction Bolus Dose Per Week
Time Frame: Study Period 1: Week 6; Study Period 2: Week 18
Correction bolus is defined as taking a bolus dose given after the peak of a glucose excursion but within 4 hours from the start of a glucose excursion and prior to start of next glucose excursion.
Study Period 1: Week 6; Study Period 2: Week 18
Correlation Between Missed Bolus Dose and Glycemic Outcomes [i.e., HbA1c, Time in BG Range (70-180 mg/dL), Time in Hyperglycemic Range (>250 mg/dL), and Time in Hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL)] Using Raw CGM Integrated Data From Tempo Pen and Tempo Smart Button
Time Frame: Study Period 1: Week 6; Study Period 2: Week 18
Correlation between Missed Bolus Dose and Glycemic Outcomes i.e., HbA1c, Time in Blood glucose (BG) Range (70-180 mg/dL), Time in Hyperglycemic Range (>250 mg/dL), and Time in Hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL) was calculated by spearman correlation. Spearman correlation coefficients range from -1 to +1. A value of -1 indicates a perfect negative correlation, and +1 indicates a perfect positive correlation.
Study Period 1: Week 6; Study Period 2: Week 18
Correlation Between Mistimed Bolus Dose and Glycemic Outcomes [i.e., HbA1c, Time in BG Range (70-180 mg/dL), Time in Hyperglycemic Range (>250 mg/dL), Time in Hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL)] Using Raw CGM Integrated Data From Tempo Pen and Tempo Smart Button
Time Frame: Study Period 1: Week 6; Study Period 2: Week 18
Correlation between Mistimed Bolus Dose and Glycemic Outcomes i.e., HbA1c, Time in Blood glucose (BG) Range (70-180 mg/dL), Time in Hyperglycemic Range (>250 mg/dL), and Time in Hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL) was calculated by spearman correlation. Spearman correlation coefficients range from -1 to +1. A value of -1 indicates a perfect negative correlation, and +1 indicates a perfect positive correlation.
Study Period 1: Week 6; Study Period 2: Week 18
Study Period 1: Participant Questionnaires (Device Satisfaction)- On Average, How Satisfied Are You With Your Current Insulin Pen?
Time Frame: At Baseline

Participant questionnaires evaluated responses to the Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button device focusing on platform satisfaction, preferences, and usefulness.

To assess existing device satisfaction of tempo pen and smart button that participants were using before the study, participants were asked: "On average, how satisfied are you with your current insulin pen?" Participants were categorized based on their responses on a 5-point Likert scale as below and are reported

  1. Extremely Unsatisfied
  2. Unsatisfied
  3. Neutral
  4. Satisfied
  5. Extremely Satisfied
At Baseline
Study Period 1: Participant Questionnaires (Device Satisfaction) - On Average, How Satisfied Are You With the Way You Manage Your Insulin Treatment on a Day-to-day Basis?
Time Frame: At Baseline

Participant questionnaires evaluated responses to the Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button device focusing on platform satisfaction, preferences, and usefulness.

To assess existing device satisfaction of tempo pen and smart button that participants were using before the study, participants were asked: "On average, how satisfied are you with the way you manage your insulin treatment on a day-to-day basis?" Participants were categorized based on their responses on a 5-point Likert scale as below and are reported.

  1. Extremely Unsatisfied
  2. Unsatisfied
  3. Neutral
  4. Satisfied
  5. Extremely Satisfied
At Baseline
Study Period 2: Participant Questionnaires (Device Preference) - I Prefer the Connected Insulin Pen Compared to the Insulin Pen I Used Before the Study?
Time Frame: Study Period 2: Week 18

Participant questionnaires evaluated responses to the Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button device focusing on platform satisfaction, preferences, and usefulness.

To assess device preference of Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button participants were asked: "I prefer the connected insulin pen compared to the insulin pen I used before the study?" Participants were categorized based on their responses on a 5-point Likert scale as below and are reported

  1. Strongly disagree
  2. Disagree
  3. Neutral
  4. Agree
  5. Strongly agree
Study Period 2: Week 18
Study Period 2: Participant Questionnaires (Device Usefulness) - I Found the App Difficult to Use to Monitor my Insulin Doses
Time Frame: Study Period 2: Week 18

Participant questionnaires evaluated responses to the Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button device focusing on satisfaction, preferences, and usefulness.

To assess device usefulness of Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button participants were asked: "I found the app difficult to use to monitor my insulin doses" Participants were categorized based on their responses on a 5-point Likert scale as below and are reported.

  1. Strongly Disagree
  2. Disagree
  3. Neutral
  4. Agree
  5. Strongly Agree
Study Period 2: Week 18
Study Period 2: Participant Questionnaires (Device Usefulness) - It Helped me to Forget Fewer Doses
Time Frame: Study Period 2: Week 18

Participant questionnaires evaluated responses to the Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button device focusing on platform satisfaction, preferences, and usefulness.

To assess device usefulness of Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button participants were asked: "It helped me to forget fewer doses" Participants were categorized based on their responses on a 5-point Likert scale as below and are reported

  1. Strongly Disagree
  2. Disagree
  3. Neutral
  4. Agree
  5. Strongly Agree
Study Period 2: Week 18
Study Period 2: Participant Questionnaires (Device Usefulness) - I no Longer Had to Worry About When my Last Dose Was Injected or Not
Time Frame: Study Period 2: Week 18

Participant questionnaires evaluated responses to the Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button device focusing on platform satisfaction, preferences, and usefulness.

To assess device usefulness of Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button participants were asked "I no longer had to worry about when my last dose was injected or not" Participants were categorized based on their responses on a 5-point Likert scale as below and are reported

  1. Strongly Disagree
  2. Disagree
  3. Neutral
  4. Agree
  5. Strongly Agree
Study Period 2: Week 18
Study Period 2: Participant Questionnaires (Device Usefulness) - Having All my Insulin and Glucose Data in One Place Simplified my Diabetes Management
Time Frame: Study Period 2: Week 18

Participant questionnaires evaluated responses to the Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button device focusing on platform satisfaction, preferences, and usefulness.

To assess device usefulness of Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button participants were asked: "Having all my insulin and glucose data in one place simplified my diabetes management" Participants were categorized based on their responses on a 5-point Likert scale as below and are reported

  1. Strongly Disagree
  2. Disagree
  3. Neutral
  4. Agree
  5. Strongly Agree
Study Period 2: Week 18
Study Period 2: Participant Questionnaires (Device Usefulness): I Found the Connected Pen to be Difficult to Use
Time Frame: Study Period 2: Week 18

Participant questionnaires evaluated responses to the Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button device focusing on platform satisfaction, preferences, and usefulness.

To assess device usefulness of Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button participants were asked: "I found the connected pen to be difficult to use" Participants were categorized based on their responses on a 5-point Likert scale as below and are reported.

  1. Strongly Disagree
  2. Disagree
  3. Neutral
  4. Agree
  5. Strongly Agree
Study Period 2: Week 18
Study Period 2: Participant Questionnaires (Device Usefulness): The Use of the Connected Insulin Pen Reduced the Amount of Time I Spent on my Diabetes Management
Time Frame: Study Period 2: Week 18

Participant questionnaires evaluated responses to the Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button device focusing on platform satisfaction, preferences, and usefulness.

To assess device usefulness of Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button participants were asked: "The use of the connected insulin pen reduced the amount of time I spent on my diabetes management". Participants were categorized based on their responses on a 5-point Likert scale as below and are reported.

  1. Strongly Disagree
  2. Disagree
  3. Neutral
  4. Agree
  5. Strongly Agree
Study Period 2: Week 18
Health Care Provider (HCP) Questionnaires (Device Satisfaction) - On Average, How Satisfied Are You With the Connected Insulin Pen Your Patients Have Been Using in the Study?
Time Frame: Following completion of participant's Last visit in the study (approximately 3 days after last visit on week 18)

The Health Care Provider (HCP) questionnaires evaluated responses from HCPs related to Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button device focusing on satisfaction, preferences, and usefulness. Questionnaire was completed independently by HCPs (Including Principal Investigator, study coordinator or nurse). This evaluation was a general, aggregate assessment and was not linked to any specific participant. To assess Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button device satisfaction HCPs were asked: "On average, how satisfied are you with the connected insulin pen your patients have been using in the study?"

HCPs were categorized based on their responses on a 5-point Likert scale as below and are reported.

  1. Extremely Unsatisfied
  2. Unsatisfied
  3. Neutral
  4. Satisfied
  5. Extremely Satisfied
Following completion of participant's Last visit in the study (approximately 3 days after last visit on week 18)
Health Care Provider (HCP) Questionnaires (Device Usefulness) - Offered me Objective Date on my Patients Dosing History Allowing me to Provide Appropriate Dosing Guidance
Time Frame: Following completion of participant's Last visit in the study (approximately 3 days after last visit on week 18)

The Health Care Provider (HCP) questionnaires evaluated responses from HCPs related to Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button device focusing on device satisfaction, preferences, and usefulness. Questionnaire was completed independently by HCPs (including principal Investigator, study coordinator or nurse). This evaluation was a general, aggregate assessment and was not linked to any specific participant. To assess Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button device usefulness HCPs were asked: "Offered me objective date on my patients dosing history allowing me to provide appropriate dosing guidance".

HCPs were categorized based on their responses on a 5-point Likert scale as below and are reported.

  1. Strongly Disagree
  2. Disagree
  3. Neutral
  4. Agree
  5. Strongly Agree
Following completion of participant's Last visit in the study (approximately 3 days after last visit on week 18)
Health Care Provider (HCP) Questionnaires (Device Usefulness)- It Improved my Confidence in Making Appropriate Dosing Decisions
Time Frame: Following completion of participant's Last visit in the study (approximately 3 days after last visit on week 18)

The Health Care Provider (HCP) questionnaires evaluated responses from HCPs related to Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button device focusing on satisfaction, preferences, and usefulness.

Questionnaire was completed independently by HCPs (including principal Investigator, study coordinator or nurse). This evaluation was a general, aggregate assessment and was not linked to any specific participant. To assess Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button device usefulness HCPs were asked: "It improved my confidence in making appropriate dosing decisions".

HCPs were categorized based on their responses on a 5-point Likert scale as below and are reported.

  1. Strongly Disagree
  2. Disagree
  3. Neutral
  4. Agree
  5. Strongly Agree
Following completion of participant's Last visit in the study (approximately 3 days after last visit on week 18)
Health Care Provider (HCP) Questionnaires (Device Usefulness) - I Suspect That my Patients Miss Insulin Doses Regularly
Time Frame: Following completion of participant's Last visit in the study (approximately 3 days after last visit on week 18)

The Health Care Provider (HCP) questionnaires evaluated responses from HCPs related to Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button device focusing on satisfaction, preferences, and usefulness.

Questionnaire was completed independently by HCPs (Including principal Investigator, study coordinator or nurse). This evaluation was a general, aggregate assessment and was not linked to any specific participant. To assess Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button device usefulness HCPs were asked: "I suspect that my patients miss insulin doses regularly".

HCPs were categorized based on their responses on a 5-point Likert scale as below and are reported.

  1. Strongly Disagree
  2. Disagree
  3. Neutral
  4. Agree
  5. Strongly Agree
Following completion of participant's Last visit in the study (approximately 3 days after last visit on week 18)
Health Care Provider (HCP) Questionnaires (Device Usefulness)- Allowed me to Objectively Discuss Missed Doses or Mistimed Doses With my Patients
Time Frame: Following completion of participant's Last visit in the study (approximately 3 days after last visit on week 18)

The Health Care Provider (HCP) questionnaires evaluated responses from HCPs related to Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button device focusing on satisfaction, preferences, and usefulness.

Questionnaire was completed independently by HCP (Including principal Investigator, study coordinator or nurse. This evaluation was a general, aggregate assessment and was not linked to any specific participant. To assess Humalog Tempo Pen and Tempo smart button device usefulness HCPs were asked: "Allowed me to objectively discuss missed doses or mistimed doses with my patients".

HCPs were categorized based on their responses on a 5-point Likert scale as below and are reported.

  1. Strongly Disagree
  2. Disagree
  3. Neutral
  4. Agree
  5. Strongly Agree
Following completion of participant's Last visit in the study (approximately 3 days after last visit on week 18)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), Eli Lilly and Company

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 5, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 16, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 16, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 1 Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Insulin Lispro

Subscribe