Effect of Repetitive TMS on Executive Function in Alcohol Use Disorder

February 6, 2025 updated by: Eduardo Adrian Garza Villarreal, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico

Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Executive Function in Alcohol Use Disorder

Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) is a major public health problem that affects the physical, social, family, and mental integrity of the sufferer. Behavioral self-regulation is compromised in AUD, and a benefit has been reported with the application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and emotional self-regulation. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of high-frequency rTMS to improve executive functions in patients in abstinence from AUD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

It is proposed that individuals predisposed to developing alcohol use disorder (AUD) exhibit alterations in executive functions, resulting from maladaptive cellular homeostatic processes and neuronal circuits activated by substance use. These alterations persist even after substance withdrawal (Nestler & Aghajanian, 1997). As a multifactorial disorder, AUD has been linked to family history of alcohol use (Khemiri et al., 2020; Peterson et al., 1990; Tarter et al., 1989) and individual traits such as poor cognitive test performance relative to controls (Shnitko et al., 2018; Goudriaan et al., 2011), which may predict heavy alcohol consumption or AUD development.

These executive dysfunctions manifest as persistent negative behaviors that impede adaptive learning and reduced activation of the executive control network, both of which correlate with AUD severity (Mayhugh et al., 2014). Cognitive flexibility, a key executive function, enables adaptive adjustment of thoughts and behaviors in response to environmental demands (Uddin, 2021). Impaired cognitive flexibility is associated with AUD persistence and severity (Stalnaker et al., 2008), though recovery is observed after prolonged abstinence (Rourke & Grant, 1999). Thus, cognitive flexibility may serve as a promising treatment biomarker.

McLellan et al. (2000) report that 40-60% of AUD patients relapse within the first year post-treatment, while at least 60% relapse within six months (Durazzo & Meyerhoff, 2017; Kirshenbaum et al., 2009; Maisto et al., 2006a; Meyerhoff & Durazzo, 2010). Given these challenges, non-invasive neuromodulation techniques like repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have emerged as adjunct therapies to standard treatments (Diana et al., 2017). For example, Addolorato et al. (2017) applied high-frequency (10 Hz) rTMS to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in AUD patients and observed reduced alcohol consumption and increased abstinent days. Similarly, Del Felice et al. (2016) found that left DLPFC stimulation enhanced inhibitory control, selective attention, and mood in active alcohol users.

Stimulating the DLPFC, a hub of the executive control network, may enhance its functional connectivity and improve cognitive flexibility in AUD patients. These effects align with findings that rTMS bolsters inhibitory control and attention (Del Felice et al., 2016; Diana et al., 2017). To explore this further, we propose a longitudinal study assessing cognitive/behavioral traits in AUD patients that may contribute to disorder development. We will also evaluate rTMS effects using neuropsychological tools and MRI to measure structural/functional brain changes.

This study aims to investigate the short- and long-term clinical and cognitive effects of 10 Hz rTMS applied to the left DLPFC in abstinent AUD patients, alongside associated neurostructural and functional connectivity changes. Abstinent AUD patients will receive daily rTMS for four weeks. Clinical outcomes will be tracked for six months, with cognitive, structural, and functional connectivity measurements taken at baseline, post-intervention (4 weeks), and follow-up (6 months).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Queretaro
      • Querétaro City, Queretaro, Mexico, 76230
        • Recruiting
        • Unidad de Resonancia Magnética
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Eduardo A Garza Villarreal, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women of 25 to 59 years old
  • The reading level of at least 6th grade of primary (equivalent to fifth grade of elementary school).
  • Alcohol users with and AUDIT ≥ 20 puntos
  • Abstinence from alcohol consumption from 8 weeks to 5 years, with CIWA-Ar scale scores ≤ 9 points.
  • No disabling neuropsychiatric conditions (i.e. Schizophrenia)
  • No substance use disorders except alcohol and nicotine.
  • BrAC (Breath Alcohol) = 0.00 mg/dl in each of the assessments.
  • No traces of alcohol consumption using urine test strips.
  • No contraindications for TMS therapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with symptoms of severe agitation or who are unable to cooperate in the study
  • History of epilepsy
  • Sudden onset of stroke, focal neurological findings such as hemiparesis, sensory loss, visual field deficits and lack of coordination.
  • Seizures or gait disturbances
  • History of severe psychiatric disorders.
  • Alterations in a conventional electroencephalogram.
  • Pacemakers or intracranial metallic objects.

Elimination criteria

  • At the subject's request
  • The presence of adverse incidents that deteriorate the subject's health and would limit continuation of rTMS treatment.
  • Exacerbation of cognitive or behavioral symptoms during treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active rTMS frequency at 10 Hz
The intervention will be Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Each patient will receive treatment stimulation in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC) with a frequency of 10 Hz, that includes 2 sessions per day for 20 consecutive business days for 4 weeks. Each session will consist of the application of rTMS at a frequency of 10 Hz, to 100% of the motor threshold. The lDLPFC target will be determined using their resting state functional connectivity between anterior cingulate cortex and lDLPFC. Our algorithm performs a calculation of the individual localization of the participant's lDLPFC, which will be used for the whole study in that particular participant.

The investigators will use a Magstim Rapid 2 stimulator, Airfilled coil (AFC), 8 shape (magnetic field of 0.8 Teslas, 3Kg, pulse 0.5 ms)

Each patient will receive high frequency 10 Hz stimulation at 100% of motor threshold over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) at 1500 pulses per session with 30 trains of 5 seconds and 0.5 ms stimuli and an inter-train distance of 15 seconds. In 2 daily sessions 4 days a week for 4 weeks.

Sham Comparator: Sham rTMS frequency at 10 Hz
The intervention will be Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (Sham). For this patients the coil will be located on the vertex. Each patient will receive sham stimulation with a frequency of 10 Hz, that includes 2 sessions per day for 20 consecutive business days for 4 weeks. Each session will consist of the application of rTMS at a frequency of 10 Hz, to 100% of the motor threshold. The lDLPFC target will be determined using their resting state functional connectivity between anterior cingulate cortex and lDLPFC. Our algorithm performs a calculation of the individual localization of the participant's lDLPFC, which will be used for the whole study in that particular participant.

The investigators will use a Magstim Rapid 2 stimulator, Airfilled coil (AFC), 8 shape (magnetic field of 0.8 Teslas, 3Kg, pulse 0.5 ms)

Each patient will receive consistent treatment in 2 sessions a day for 20 consecutive business days for 4 weeks. The coil will be placed on the vertex target location.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Wisconsin Card Sorting Task
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Measured by Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST) to evaluate cognitive flexibility
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change STROOP effect
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Measured by STROOP test to evaluate control inhibition
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change Visoespatial Memory
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Measured by Visoespatial Memory test to evaluate visoespatial memory
Baseline, 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Taskswitching Task Switch cost
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Measured by Taskswitching task to evaluate cognitive flexibility
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change in Flanker Task Flanker Efect
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Measured by Flanker task to evaluate control inhibition
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change in Nback Task accuracy
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Measured by Nback task to evaluate working memory
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change in Alcohol Craving (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months
The craving will be measured using a 100 mm visual analogue scales
Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months
Changes in psychopathological symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months
Measured by the Symptoms Questionnaire 90 (SCL-90)
Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months
Changes in WHODAS score
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months
Measured by Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS)
Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months
Changes in Anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months
Measured by Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS)
Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months
Changes in Depression
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months
Measured by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)
Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months
Changes in functional connectivity
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Functional connectivity of the dorsolateral prefrontal with the anterior cingulate cortex, measured with fMRI defined by the temporal correlation in the blood-oxygen-level-dependent signals of the regions. Higher correlations indicate stronger functional connectivity.
Baseline, 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eduardo A Garza-Villarreal, MD, PhD, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 16, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All clinical and MRI data will be shared with each patient's written consent. Identification information will not be shared, only the RID, and all MRI structural data will be defaced prior to sharing. MRI data will be uploaded to Open Neuro while the clinical data will be uploaded to Zenodo.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be shared once the study is finished and published, aproximately in 2027

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

open access

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol Use Disorder

Clinical Trials on Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Subscribe