- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06183372
Enhancement of Calmness and Mood Following Acute Lemon Balm Supplementation During Cognitive Demand in Adults (LemCog)
A Randomised Double-blind Placebo-controlled Acute Trial of Encapsulated Lemon Balm Efficacy and Tolerance on Calmness and Mood During Periods of Cognitive Demand
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Cognitive overload can be a common occurrence in an information saturated world (Eppler et al., 2008; Graf et al., 2021; Pass et al., 2004), and chronic cognitive overload is considered an initiating step in the emergence of various physical and emotional health concerns, likely due to high processing demands on the working memory neural system (Graf et al., 2021). Over time, psychological and physiological stress may arise, however current chemical interventions may be unsuitable for those experiencing mild-to-moderate levels of stress (Ghazizadeh et al., 2021). Indeed, long-term use of psychotropic medicines have previously been associated with a worsening of psychological symptoms (Bertuccioli et al., 2022). Therefore, identifying interventions for those experiencing mild-to-moderate stress will have strong public health implications for the prevention or reduction of symptoms. In addition, an opportunity for dietary supplementation as an over-the-counter option for those who do not wish to take chemical interventions is becoming a popular choice (Ghazizadeh et al., 2021; Bertuccioli et al. 2022).
The current study will employ a parallel, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial, assessing the effect of a single dose intervention of lemon balm extract (or matched placebo) in young-to-middle-aged adults with moderate levels of perceived stress. Subjects will be pre-screened to determine eligibility using the perceived stress questionnaire, where scores between 14 to 26 are indicative of moderate stress, to provide a total of 130 participants. The study comprises a familiarisation visit followed by an acute test day at the Nutritional Psychology Unit based at the University of Reading. The familiarisation visit will allow participants to practice the cognitive battery, complete calmness and mood measures, and provide information on habitual diet (Epic-Norfolk FFQ) and general health and lifestyle patterns to confirm eligibility. On the acute test day, subjective calmness and mood ratings will be recorded at various timepoints throughout the day, beginning with an initial baseline measurement (0h), and then 1h, 3h and 5h after consuming an acute dose of lemon balm extract (300mg) or a matched placebo. At these same timepoints, a computer-based cognitive battery will be completed, consisting of several tasks assessing domains of executive function, attention and memory. On the acute test day participants will arrive fasted and will be provided with a standardised breakfast (two croissants and a glass of water) to be consumed prior to 0h baseline measures. A standardised lunch (cheese sandwich, packet of crisps, and water) will also be provided after the 3h timepoint.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Claire M Williams
- Phone Number: +44 (0) 118 378 7540
- Email: claire.williams@reading.ac.uk
Study Locations
-
-
-
Reading, United Kingdom, RG2 9AH
- Recruiting
- University of Reading
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Lynne Bell, PhD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Daniel Lamport, PhD
-
Contact:
- Claire M Williams, PhD
- Phone Number: +44 (0) 118 378 7540
- Email: claire.williams@reading.ac.uk
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Jess Eastwood, PhD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Imogen Mathews, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy, between 18-40 years old
- Moderate Stress problems (PSS between 14 to 26)
- No alcohol or vigorous activity 24h before the task
- No coffee/caffeine intake 12h before the visits
- Non-smokers or Must not smoke during 7 days prior to the trial: Includes smoking tobacco, vaping nicotine, using nicotine replacement products, or occasional social smoking.
- Willingness to wash out for food supplementation during 2 weeks before the experiment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Use medications that may affect the outcome
- Any long-term psychological or physiological health conditions
- Have any allergic reactions to ingredients in the capsules
- Have a BMI greater than or equal to 30
- Have any allergic reactions to ingredients in the capsules
- Consumed more than 400 mg of caffeine (>5 expresso) per day in the past 2 weeks
- Have used any psychotropic medications, stimulants, cannabis, non-registered drug products, or illicit substances in the past 2 weeks, were at risk of drug or alcohol abuse
- Taking any dietary supplements which they are unwilling to stop for the duration of the study
- Have sleep disorders or are taking sleep aid medication
- Fail to demonstrate adequate minimal performance on lab, computer-based cognitive tasks
- Have a diagnosed neurological condition, or learning/behavioural or neurodevelopmental differences (e.g. dyslexia, autism, ADHD).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Lemon balm
300mg Lemon balm and Maltoxdextrin capsules
|
300mg Lemon balm and Maltoxdextrin capsules Other Name: Melissa Officinalis L.
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
300mg Maltodextrin capsules
|
300mg Maltodextrin capsules
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Calmness 9-point Likert Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
|
A validated 9-point Likert scale with Calmness Anchor points (CAP) ranging from 1, "Not at all Calm" to 9, "Extremely Calm"
|
Baseline
|
Calmness 9-point Likert Scale
Time Frame: 5 hours following intervention
|
A validated 9-point Likert scale with Calmness Anchor points (CAP) ranging from 1, "Not at all Calm" to 9, "Extremely Calm"
|
5 hours following intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Fatigue 9-point Likert Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
|
A validated 9-point Likert scale with Fatigue Anchor points (FAP) ranging from 1, "Not at all mentally fatigued" and 9, "Extremely mentally fatigued"
|
Baseline
|
Fatigue 9-point Likert Scale
Time Frame: 5 hours following intervention
|
A validated 9-point Likert scale with Fatigue Anchor points (FAP) ranging from 1, "Not at all mentally fatigued" and 9, "Extremely mentally fatigued"
|
5 hours following intervention
|
Subject Satisfaction 4-point Category Scale
Time Frame: 1 hour following intervention
|
A two-part questionnaire based on a previously published 4-category rating questionnaire.
The first part asks about current levels of tiredness and mental overload, using a 4-point Likert anchored from "not at all" (score 1) to "extremely" (score 4).
The second part asks how satisfied a person is with their levels of tiredness and mental overload following supplementation, and asks them to rate their overall satisfaction with the supplement, using scales "not at all satisfied" (score 1) to "entirely satisfied" (score 4).
|
1 hour following intervention
|
Subject Satisfaction 4-point Category Scale
Time Frame: 3 hours following intervention
|
A two-part questionnaire based on a previously published 4-category rating questionnaire.
The first part asks about current levels of tiredness and mental overload, using a 4-point Likert anchored from "not at all" (score 1) to "extremely" (score 4).
The second part asks how satisfied a person is with their levels of tiredness and mental overload following supplementation, and asks them to rate their overall satisfaction with the supplement, using scales "not at all satisfied" (score 1) to "entirely satisfied" (score 4).
|
3 hours following intervention
|
Subject Satisfaction 4-point Category Scale
Time Frame: 5 hours following intervention
|
A two-part questionnaire based on a previously published 4-category rating questionnaire.
The first part asks about current levels of tiredness and mental overload, using a 4-point Likert anchored from "not at all" (score 1) to "extremely" (score 4).
The second part asks how satisfied a person is with their levels of tiredness and mental overload following supplementation, and asks them to rate their overall satisfaction with the supplement, using scales "not at all satisfied" (score 1) to "entirely satisfied" (score 4).
|
5 hours following intervention
|
Visual Analogue Stress Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Ratings of stress are captured using 100mm Visual Analogue Scales anchored at each end by words descriptive of the minimal and maximal extremes of one statement (unipolar).
On this linear scale, the person indicates how he or she is feeling at the moment by placing a mark between 2 statements concerning a specific condition of the dimension being measured.
This brief instrument assesses levels of stress, anxiety, calmness and relaxation.
Individual scores are combined to form 'stress/anxiety' and 'calm/relaxed' scores, where a higher score (average % along the line) represents more of the respective descriptor.
|
Baseline
|
Visual Analogue Stress Scale
Time Frame: 1 hour following intervention
|
Ratings of stress are captured using 100mm Visual Analogue Scales anchored at each end by words descriptive of the minimal and maximal extremes of one statement (unipolar).
On this linear scale, the person indicates how he or she is feeling at the moment by placing a mark between 2 statements concerning a specific condition of the dimension being measured.
This brief instrument assesses levels of stress, anxiety, calmness and relaxation.
Individual scores are combined to form 'stress/anxiety' and 'calm/relaxed' scores, where a higher score (average % along the line) represents more of the respective descriptor.
|
1 hour following intervention
|
Visual Analogue Stress Scale
Time Frame: 3 hours following intervention
|
Ratings of stress are captured using 100mm Visual Analogue Scales anchored at each end by words descriptive of the minimal and maximal extremes of one statement (unipolar).
On this linear scale, the person indicates how he or she is feeling at the moment by placing a mark between 2 statements concerning a specific condition of the dimension being measured.
This brief instrument assesses levels of stress, anxiety, calmness and relaxation.
Individual scores are combined to form 'stress/anxiety' and 'calm/relaxed' scores, where a higher score (average % along the line) represents more of the respective descriptor.
|
3 hours following intervention
|
Visual Analogue Stress Scale
Time Frame: 5 hours following intervention
|
Ratings of stress are captured using 100mm Visual Analogue Scales anchored at each end by words descriptive of the minimal and maximal extremes of one statement (unipolar).
On this linear scale, the person indicates how he or she is feeling at the moment by placing a mark between 2 statements concerning a specific condition of the dimension being measured.
This brief instrument assesses levels of stress, anxiety, calmness and relaxation.
Individual scores are combined to form 'stress/anxiety' and 'calm/relaxed' scores, where a higher score (average % along the line) represents more of the respective descriptor.
|
5 hours following intervention
|
Bond-Lader 16-item Visual Analogue Stress Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
|
A widely used 16-item tool for measuring transient mood where 100mm scales anchored by various antonyms (e.g.
Alert-Drowsy, Lethargic-Energetic) and are then clustered into respective mood factors alertness, calmness and contentedness
|
Baseline
|
Bond-Lader 16-item Visual Analogue Stress Scale
Time Frame: 1 hour following intervention
|
A widely used 16-item tool for measuring transient mood where 100mm scales anchored by various antonyms (e.g.
Alert-Drowsy, Lethargic-Energetic) and are then clustered into respective mood factors alertness, calmness and contentedness
|
1 hour following intervention
|
Bond-Lader 16-item Visual Analogue Stress Scale
Time Frame: 3 hours following intervention
|
A widely used 16-item tool for measuring transient mood where 100mm scales anchored by various antonyms (e.g.
Alert-Drowsy, Lethargic-Energetic) and are then clustered into respective mood factors alertness, calmness and contentedness
|
3 hours following intervention
|
Bond-Lader 16-item Visual Analogue Stress Scale
Time Frame: 5 hours following intervention
|
A widely used 16-item tool for measuring transient mood where 100mm scales anchored by various antonyms (e.g.
Alert-Drowsy, Lethargic-Energetic) and are then clustered into respective mood factors alertness, calmness and contentedness
|
5 hours following intervention
|
Immediate Word Recall (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
A standardised cognitive measure to episodic memory.
In this task participants are visually presented with a sequential list of fifteen words where they are then given 1 minute to type as many words as they can remember.
At each sitting of the task, a different word list will be presented which will be matched for linguistic familiarity, concreteness and frequency.
The dependent variable is the number of words correctly recalled.
|
Baseline
|
Immediate Word Recall (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)
Time Frame: 1 hour following intervention
|
A standardised cognitive measure to episodic memory.
In this task participants are visually presented with a sequential list of fifteen words where they are then given 1 minute to type as many words as they can remember.
At each sitting of the task, a different word list will be presented which will be matched for linguistic familiarity, concreteness and frequency.
The dependent variable is the number of words correctly recalled.
|
1 hour following intervention
|
Immediate Word Recall (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)
Time Frame: 3 hours following intervention
|
A standardised cognitive measure to episodic memory.
In this task participants are visually presented with a sequential list of fifteen words where they are then given 1 minute to type as many words as they can remember.
At each sitting of the task, a different word list will be presented which will be matched for linguistic familiarity, concreteness and frequency.
The dependent variable is the number of words correctly recalled.
|
3 hours following intervention
|
Immediate Word Recall (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)
Time Frame: 5 hours following intervention
|
A standardised cognitive measure to episodic memory.
In this task participants are visually presented with a sequential list of fifteen words where they are then given 1 minute to type as many words as they can remember.
At each sitting of the task, a different word list will be presented which will be matched for linguistic familiarity, concreteness and frequency.
The dependent variable is the number of words correctly recalled.
|
5 hours following intervention
|
Delayed Word Recall (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
A standardised cognitive measure to assess the level of delayed episodic memory.
Participants will be required to type as many words as they can remember from the immediate word recall presentation after a delay of approximately 30 minutes following the initial presentation.
The dependent variable is the number of words correctly recalled.
|
Baseline
|
Delayed Word Recall (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)
Time Frame: 1 hour following intervention
|
A standardised cognitive measure to assess the level of delayed episodic memory.
Participants will be required to type as many words as they can remember from the immediate word recall presentation after a delay of approximately 30 minutes following the initial presentation.
The dependent variable is the number of words correctly recalled.
|
1 hour following intervention
|
Delayed Word Recall (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)
Time Frame: 3 hours following intervention
|
A standardised cognitive measure to assess the level of delayed episodic memory.
Participants will be required to type as many words as they can remember from the immediate word recall presentation after a delay of approximately 30 minutes following the initial presentation.
The dependent variable is the number of words correctly recalled.
|
3 hours following intervention
|
Delayed Word Recall (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)
Time Frame: 5 hours following intervention
|
A standardised cognitive measure to assess the level of delayed episodic memory.
Participants will be required to type as many words as they can remember from the immediate word recall presentation after a delay of approximately 30 minutes following the initial presentation.
The dependent variable is the number of words correctly recalled.
|
5 hours following intervention
|
Modified Attention Network Task (with two blocks of Serial 3's)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
A standardised measure to assess executive function and attention.
In this task participants respond to the direction of a centrally presented arrow by pressing the corresponding left and right arrow keys.
Across multiple trials, the target stimuli are either flanked by arrows pointing in the same direction (congruent) or opposite (incongruent).
The number of flanking arrows also varies between trials (load).
Two blocks are presented.
In the second block, participants will be distracted by noise through headphones.
In addition, during further subsections of the ANT an oral serial 3 (S3) subtractions task will also be performed to further assess attention and working memory function.
In this S3 task participants subtract backwards starting with the number 50 until they can go no further.
The S3 performance will be in place to add additional cognitive load and the dependent variable will be ANT performance (accuracy and reaction time) under varying conditions of congruency and load.
|
Baseline
|
Modified Attention Network Task (with two blocks of Serial 3's)
Time Frame: 1 hour following intervention
|
A standardised measure to assess executive function and attention.
In this task participants respond to the direction of a centrally presented arrow by pressing the corresponding left and right arrow keys.
Across multiple trials, the target stimuli are either flanked by arrows pointing in the same direction (congruent) or opposite (incongruent).
The number of flanking arrows also varies between trials (load).
Two blocks are presented.
In the second block, participants will be distracted by noise through headphones.
In addition, during further subsections of the ANT an oral serial 3 (S3) subtractions task will also be performed to further assess attention and working memory function.
In this S3 task participants subtract backwards starting with the number 50 until they can go no further.
The S3 performance will be in place to add additional cognitive load and the dependent variable will be ANT performance (accuracy and reaction time) under varying conditions of congruency and load.
|
1 hour following intervention
|
Modified Attention Network Task (with two blocks of Serial 3's)
Time Frame: 3 hours following intervention
|
A standardised measure to assess executive function and attention.
In this task participants respond to the direction of a centrally presented arrow by pressing the corresponding left and right arrow keys.
Across multiple trials, the target stimuli are either flanked by arrows pointing in the same direction (congruent) or opposite (incongruent).
The number of flanking arrows also varies between trials (load).
Two blocks are presented.
In the second block, participants will be distracted by noise through headphones.
In addition, during further subsections of the ANT an oral serial 3 (S3) subtractions task will also be performed to further assess attention and working memory function.
In this S3 task participants subtract backwards starting with the number 50 until they can go no further.
The S3 performance will be in place to add additional cognitive load and the dependent variable will be ANT performance (accuracy and reaction time) under varying conditions of congruency and load.
|
3 hours following intervention
|
Modified Attention Network Task (with two blocks of Serial 3's)
Time Frame: 5 hours following intervention
|
A standardised measure to assess executive function and attention.
In this task participants respond to the direction of a centrally presented arrow by pressing the corresponding left and right arrow keys.
Across multiple trials, the target stimuli are either flanked by arrows pointing in the same direction (congruent) or opposite (incongruent).
The number of flanking arrows also varies between trials (load).
Two blocks are presented.
In the second block, participants will be distracted by noise through headphones.
In addition, during further subsections of the ANT an oral serial 3 (S3) subtractions task will also be performed to further assess attention and working memory function.
In this S3 task participants subtract backwards starting with the number 50 until they can go no further.
The S3 performance will be in place to add additional cognitive load and the dependent variable will be ANT performance (accuracy and reaction time) under varying conditions of congruency and load.
|
5 hours following intervention
|
Task Switching Test
Time Frame: Baseline
|
A standardised cognitive task to assess executive function.
In this task participants are presented with a computerised visual circle with 8 equally spaced radii that form 8 segments, 4 above and 4 below a bold line.
A stimulus digit appears sequentially in each segment in a clockwise direction.
If the digit was located above the bold line, participants then indicate whether the digit was odd or even using labelled arrow keys (left for odd, right for even).
When the digit is below the bold line, participants again use the arrow keys to indicate whether the digit is higher or lower than 5 (left for higher, right for lower).
The dependent variable will be TST performance (accuracy and reaction time) across all trials, and comparing switch trials (where the rule changes from the previous trial) and non-switch trials (where the rule stays the same as the previous trial).
|
Baseline
|
Task Switching Test
Time Frame: 1 hours following intervention
|
A standardised cognitive task to assess executive function.
In this task participants are presented with a computerised visual circle with 8 equally spaced radii that form 8 segments, 4 above and 4 below a bold line.
A stimulus digit appears sequentially in each segment in a clockwise direction.
If the digit was located above the bold line, participants then indicate whether the digit was odd or even using labelled arrow keys (left for odd, right for even).
When the digit is below the bold line, participants again use the arrow keys to indicate whether the digit is higher or lower than 5 (left for higher, right for lower).
The dependent variable will be TST performance (accuracy and reaction time) across all trials, and comparing switch trials (where the rule changes from the previous trial) and non-switch trials (where the rule stays the same as the previous trial).
|
1 hours following intervention
|
Task Switching Test
Time Frame: 3 hours following intervention
|
A standardised cognitive task to assess executive function.
In this task participants are presented with a computerised visual circle with 8 equally spaced radii that form 8 segments, 4 above and 4 below a bold line.
A stimulus digit appears sequentially in each segment in a clockwise direction.
If the digit was located above the bold line, participants then indicate whether the digit was odd or even using labelled arrow keys (left for odd, right for even).
When the digit is below the bold line, participants again use the arrow keys to indicate whether the digit is higher or lower than 5 (left for higher, right for lower).The dependent variable will be TST performance (accuracy and reaction time) across all trials, and comparing switch trials (where the rule changes from the previous trial) and non-switch trials (where the rule stays the same as the previous trial).
|
3 hours following intervention
|
Task Switching Test
Time Frame: 5 hours following intervention
|
A standardised cognitive task to assess executive function.
In this task participants are presented with a computerised visual circle with 8 equally spaced radii that form 8 segments, 4 above and 4 below a bold line.
A stimulus digit appears sequentially in each segment in a clockwise direction.
If the digit was located above the bold line, participants then indicate whether the digit was odd or even using labelled arrow keys (left for odd, right for even).
When the digit is below the bold line, participants again use the arrow keys to indicate whether the digit is higher or lower than 5 (left for higher, right for lower).The dependent variable will be TST performance (accuracy and reaction time) across all trials, and comparing switch trials (where the rule changes from the previous trial) and non-switch trials (where the rule stays the same as the previous trial).
|
5 hours following intervention
|
Rapid Visual Information Processing Task
Time Frame: Baseline
|
A standardised cognitive task which involves presenting a series of digits on screen in quick succession.
The participant will then be required to monitor the digits for sequences of three consecutive even or three consecutive odd digits.
To indicate the end of a target sequence, participants will press the space bar as quickly as possible.
The dependent variable is task performance (accuracy and reaction time).
|
Baseline
|
Rapid Visual Information Processing Task
Time Frame: 1 hour following intervention
|
A standardised cognitive task which involves presenting a series of digits on screen in quick succession.
The participant will then be required to monitor the digits for sequences of three consecutive even or three consecutive odd digits.
To indicate the end of a target sequence, participants will press the space bar as quickly as possible.
The dependent variable is task performance (accuracy and reaction time).
|
1 hour following intervention
|
Rapid Visual Information Processing Task
Time Frame: 3 hours following intervention
|
A standardised cognitive task which involves presenting a series of digits on a screen in quick succession.
The participant will then be required to monitor the digits for sequences of three consecutive even or three consecutive odd digits.
To indicate the end of a target sequence, participants will press the space bar as quickly as possible.
The dependent variable is task performance (accuracy and reaction time).
|
3 hours following intervention
|
Rapid Visual Information Processing Task
Time Frame: 5 hours following intervention
|
A standardised cognitive task which involves presenting a series of digits on a screen in quick succession.
The participant will then be required to monitor the digits for sequences of three consecutive even or three consecutive odd digits.
To indicate the end of a target sequence, participants will press the space bar as quickly as possible.
The dependent variable is task performance (accuracy and reaction time).
|
5 hours following intervention
|
Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task
Time Frame: Baseline
|
A standardised cognitive task to assess attention and memory.
The participant is presented with a string of auditory single digits and required to add each new digit to the one immediately prior to it out loud so that responses can be recorded.
The dependent variable is therefore accuracy of calculation.
The task comprises of 4, 2 minute blocks, where interstimulus time progressively decreases from 2.8 seconds to 1.6 seconds and cognitive demand therefore progressively increases.
|
Baseline
|
Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task
Time Frame: 1 hour following intervention
|
A standardised cognitive task to assess attention and memory.
The participant is presented with a string of auditory single digits and required to add each new digit to the one immediately prior to it out loud so that responses can be recorded.
The dependent variable is therefore accuracy of calculation.
The task comprises of 4, 2 minute blocks, where interstimulus time progressively decreases from 2.8 seconds to 1.6 seconds and cognitive demand therefore progressively increases.
|
1 hour following intervention
|
Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task
Time Frame: 3 hours following intervention
|
A standardised cognitive task to assess attention and memory.
The participant is presented with a string of auditory single digits and required to add each new digit to the one immediately prior to it out loud so that responses can be recorded.
The dependent variable is therefore accuracy of calculation.
The task comprises of 4, 2 minute blocks, where interstimulus time progressively decreases from 2.8 seconds to 1.6 seconds and cognitive demand therefore progressively increases.
|
3 hours following intervention
|
Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task
Time Frame: 5 hours following intervention
|
A standardised cognitive task to assess attention and memory.
The participant is presented with a string of auditory single digits and required to add each new digit to the one immediately prior to it out loud so that responses can be recorded.
The dependent variable is therefore accuracy of calculation.
The task comprises of 4, 2 minute blocks, where interstimulus time progressively decreases from 2.8 seconds to 1.6 seconds and cognitive demand therefore progressively increases.
|
5 hours following intervention
|
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Average (triplicate) resting brachial left arm cuffed systolic blood pressure mmHg
|
Baseline
|
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 1 hour following intervention
|
Average (triplicate) resting brachial left arm cuffed systolic blood pressure mmHg
|
1 hour following intervention
|
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 3 hour following intervention
|
Average (triplicate) resting brachial (left arm) cuffed systolic blood pressure mmHg
|
3 hour following intervention
|
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 5 hour following intervention
|
Average (triplicate) resting brachial (left arm) cuffed systolic blood pressure mmHg
|
5 hour following intervention
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Average (triplicate) resting brachial (left arm) cuffed diastolic blood pressure mmHg
|
Baseline
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 1 hour following intervention
|
Average (triplicate) resting brachial (left arm) cuffed diastolic blood pressure mmHg
|
1 hour following intervention
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 3 hours following intervention
|
Average (triplicate) resting brachial (left arm) cuffed diastolic blood pressure mmHg
|
3 hours following intervention
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 5 hours following intervention
|
Average (triplicate) resting brachial (left arm) cuffed diastolic blood pressure mmHg
|
5 hours following intervention
|
Heart Rate
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Average (triplicate) resting brachial (left arm) cuffed heart rate bpm
|
Baseline
|
Heart Rate
Time Frame: 1 hour following intervention
|
Average (triplicate) resting brachial (left arm) cuffed heart rate bpm
|
1 hour following intervention
|
Heart Rate
Time Frame: 3 hours following intervention
|
Average (triplicate) resting brachial (left arm) cuffed heart rate bpm
|
3 hours following intervention
|
Heart Rate
Time Frame: 5 hours following intervention
|
Average (triplicate) resting brachial (left arm) cuffed heart rate bpm
|
5 hours following intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Claire M Williams, University of Reading
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Bertuccioli A, Cardinali M, Di Pierro F, Magi S, Zonzini G. A Practical Perspective on the Use of Botanicals During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Proven to Potential Interactions. J Med Food. 2022 Jan;25(1):1-11. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2021.0062. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
- Ghazizadeh J, Sadigh-Eteghad S, Marx W, Fakhari A, Hamedeyazdan S, Torbati M, Taheri-Tarighi S, Araj-Khodaei M, Mirghafourvand M. The effects of lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) on depression and anxiety in clinical trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Phytother Res. 2021 Dec;35(12):6690-6705. doi: 10.1002/ptr.7252. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
Helpful Links
- Eppler, M.J., Mengis, J. (2008). The Concept of Information Overload - A Review of Literature from Organization Science... (2004). In: Meckel, M., Schmid, B.F. (eds) Kommunikationsmanagement im Wandel. Gab
- Pass, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive Load Theory: Instructional Implications of the Interaction between Information Structures and Cognitive Architecture. Instructional Science, 32(1-2), 1-8.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 23/25
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stress
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompletedStress | Emotional Stress | Psychological Stress | Social Stress | Life StressUnited States
-
University of PadovaRecruitingStress | Stress Disorder | Work Related StressItaly
-
University of California, Los AngelesUniversity of California, San Francisco; Stanford University; California Initiative...Enrolling by invitationStress | Stress, Psychological | Stress, Emotional | Stress, Physiological | Stress ReactionUnited States
-
Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteEnrolling by invitationStress | Post Traumatic Stress Disorder | Work Related StressUnited States
-
Duquesne UniversityUniversity of California, San Diego; West Penn Allegheny Health System; El Centro... and other collaboratorsTerminated
-
University of Sao PauloCompleted
-
Syracuse VA Medical CenterUS Department of Veterans AffairsCompletedEmotional Stress | Psychological Stress | Life StressUnited States
-
Royal Cornwall Hospitals TrustEnrolling by invitationStress | Stress, Psychological | Stress, JobUnited Kingdom
-
Northumbria UniversityVolac International LtdRecruitingStress | Mood | Physiological StressUnited Kingdom
-
Taichung Veterans General HospitalUnknown
Clinical Trials on Lemon balm
-
Ayub Teaching HospitalAyub Medical College, AbbottabadCompletedDepression | Stress | Insomnia | AnxietyPakistan
-
University of ReadingNaturexCompletedSleep Disturbance | Mood DisturbanceUnited Kingdom
-
Postgraduate Medical Institute, LahoreCompletedChronic PeriodontitisPakistan
-
BLIS Technologies LimitedRecruitingMicrobial ColonizationNew Zealand
-
Ataturk UniversityCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompleted
-
Northumbria UniversityFinzelberg GmbHCompletedCognitive Change | Behavior, ChildUnited Kingdom
-
Larena SASRecruitingMelatonin BioavailabilityFrance
-
Institut de Formation et de Recherche en Médecine...RecruitingSport Injury | Blister of FootFrance
-
Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc.Atlantia Food Clinical TrialsCompletedMood | AttentionUnited States