Long-term Follow-up Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of FBX-101 in Krabbe Patients

May 14, 2024 updated by: Forge Biologics, Inc

A Long-term Follow-up Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Krabbe Patients From Gene Therapy Clinical Trials Involving the Administration of FBX-101 (AAVrh.10-hGALC)

This is an observational study that will enroll any patients with Krabbe disease that have participated in prior interventional clinical trials involving the administration of FBX-101.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

FBX-101-LTFU is a multicenter, non-interventional, Long-Term Follow-Up (LTFU) study of participants from prior interventional trials involving the administration of FBX-101. Eligible participants will undergo clinical evaluations at prespecified intervals for at least 3 years from the last visit in the prior clinical trial (up to 5 years post-FBX-101 treatment). Overall safety and additional signs of efficacy will be collected with a series of laboratory tests, diagnostic tests, and performance surveys. Additionally, children participating in interventional trials that are terminated early will be transferred to this LTFU study and will complete any pending visits from the interventional trial before starting the clinical evaluations included in this protocol.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

25

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan Hospitals - Michigan Medicine
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This is an observational long-term follow-up (LTFU) study of participants from prior interventional trials involving the administration of FBX-101.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants that have completed a prior clinical trial involving the administration of FBX-101.
  • Parent(s)/legal guardian(s) of participant willing and able to complete the informed consent process and comply with study procedures and visit schedule.

Exclusion Criteria:

•Planned or current participation in any other interventional clinical study that may confound the safety or efficacy evaluation of FBX-101 during this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients enrolled in the FBX-101-LTFU study
The participants will be followed for 36 months after they have concluded their participation in the interventional trial. They will complete 5 scheduled visits with assessments as specified in the schedule of assessments, to collect data for safety and additional signs of efficacy for FBX-101. Those patients enrolled from any other early terminated trial, will first complete pending evaluations from that trial.
A replication-deficient adeno-associated virus gene transfer vector expressing the human galactocerebrosidase (hGALC) cDNA will be delivered one-time through a venous catheter inserted into a peripheral limb vein.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Long Term safety as assessed by incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) that are attributed to FBX-101
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy as assessed by change of quality of life measured longitudinally by the Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Generic Core Scales with Family Impact Module and Multidimensional Fatigue Scale
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of developmental milestones such as language and motor skills as measured longitudinally by an specific Developmental Milestones questionnaire
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of visual function as measured longitudinally by visual evoked potentials (VEP)
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of visual function as measured longitudinally by visual acuity
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of whole blood donor chimerism
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of psychosine in whole blood and plasma
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of gross motor function measured longitudinally by Peabody Developmental Motor Scale (PDMS-2)
Time Frame: 36 months
The site is providing raw data and sponsor is calculating derived scores according to specific manual. Higher values will mean better outcome.
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of gross motor function measured longitudinally by Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOT-2)
Time Frame: 36 months
The site is providing raw data and sponsor is calculating derived scores according to specific manual. Higher values will mean better outcome.
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of gross motor function measured longitudinally by Gross Motor Function Measure 88 (GMFM-88)
Time Frame: 36 months
The site is providing raw data and sponsor is calculating derived scores according to specific manual. Higher values will mean better outcome.
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of fine motor function measured longitudinally by Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL)
Time Frame: 36 months
The site is providing raw data and sponsor is calculating derived scores according to specific manual. Higher values will mean better outcome.
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of fine motor function measured longitudinally by Beery VMI Sixth Edition (VMI)
Time Frame: 36 months
The site is providing raw data and sponsor is calculating derived scores according to specific manual. Higher values will mean better outcome.
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of fine motor function measured longitudinally by Bayley Scales of Infant Development (Bayley-III)
Time Frame: 36 months
The site is providing raw data and sponsor is calculating derived scores according to specific manual. Higher values will mean better outcome.
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of fine motor function measured longitudinally by Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (Vineland 3)
Time Frame: 36 months
The site is providing raw data and sponsor is calculating derived scores according to specific manual. Higher values will mean better outcome.
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of cognitive function measured longitudinally by Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL)
Time Frame: 36 months
The site is providing raw data and sponsor is calculating derived scores according to specific manual. Higher values will mean better outcome.
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of cognitive function measured longitudinally by the Differential Ability Scale II (DAS-II)
Time Frame: 36 months
The site is providing raw data and sponsor is calculating derived scores according to specific manual. Higher values will mean better outcome.
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of cognitive function measured longitudinally by Bayley Scales of Infant Development (Bayley-III)
Time Frame: 36 months
The site is providing raw data and sponsor is calculating derived scores according to specific manual. Higher values will mean better outcome.
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of adaptive behaviour function measured longitudinally by Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (Vineland 3).
Time Frame: 36 months
The site is providing raw data and sponsor is calculating derived scores according to specific manual. Higher values will mean better outcome.
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of language function measured longitudinally by Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL).
Time Frame: 36 months
The site is providing raw data and sponsor is calculating derived scores according to specific manual. Higher values will mean better outcome.
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of language function measured longitudinally by Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals Fifth Edition (CELF-5)
Time Frame: 36 months
The site is providing raw data and sponsor is calculating derived scores according to specific manual. Higher values will mean better outcome.
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of language function measured longitudinally by Bayley Scales of Infant Development (Bayley-III)
Time Frame: 36 months
The site is providing raw data and sponsor is calculating derived scores according to specific manual. Higher values will mean better outcome.
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of language function measured longitudinally by Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (Vineland 3).
Time Frame: 36 months
The site is providing raw data and sponsor is calculating derived scores according to specific manual. Higher values will mean better outcome.
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of hearing function measured longitudinally by Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABRs)
Time Frame: 36 months
Absolute values for Waves I, III and V in milliseconds will be recorded along interpretation and waveform morphology; and also Auditory Brainstem Responses (corrected).
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of hearing function measured longitudinally by Behavior Audiometry (BAUD)
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of peripheral nerve conduction velocity measured longitudinally by Nerve Conduction Velocity (NCV) assessments
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of Fractional Anisotropy (FA) as measured longitudinally by brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months
Efficacy as assessed by change of Galactosylceramidase (GALC) levels in plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)
Time Frame: 36 months
36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

May 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Krabbe Disease

Clinical Trials on FBX-101

3
Subscribe