Sciatic Nerve Block for Ankle and Leg Fracture Manipulation in the Emergency Department (AnkleMan)

March 21, 2024 updated by: Santi Di Pietro, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo

Ultrasound-guided Sciatic Nerve Block for Distal Leg and Ankle Fracture Manipulation in the Emergency Department: A Feasibility Study

The goal of this feasibility clinical trial is to assess the acceptability of ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block when performed at Emergency Departments for manipulation and temporary stabilization of distal leg and ankle fractures.

The trial aims to assess:

  • The acceptability of sciatic nerve block
  • The technical feasibility of sciatic nerve block
  • The technical success of sciatic nerve block
  • The analgesic efficacy of sciatic nerve block

In addition to that, this study aims to

  • Describe patient-reported and physician-reported satisfaction
  • Assess the Adverse Event rate at 48 hours post intervention

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Pavia, Italy, 27100
        • Emergency Department, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18
  • Confirmed radiological diagnosis of distal tibia fracture (Group 43 according to AO classification, all subtypes included); or malleolar fracture (Group 44 according to AO classification, all subtypes included); or distal fibula fracture (Group 4F3 according to AO classification, both the two subtypes included); or any combination of the fracture patterns described
  • Fractures requiring manipulation in the ED to achieve temporary stabilization either as manual reduction and cast immobilization; or calcaneal pin traction (as per local policy or treating physician's preference)
  • Capacity to understand the aim of the study, the potential benefits and harms of the proposed intervention
  • Capacity to provide consent
  • Capacity to provide a self-assessment of pain using the written VAS Scale

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fractures that do not require any form of manipulation in the ED according to the treating physician (e.g., fractures with minimal or no displacement of the bony fragments, that are immobilized in a posterior leg cast by the nursing stuff/physicians assistants without any painful manipulations of the bony fragments performed by the physician)
  • Open fractures
  • Perisynthetic or periprosthetic fractures
  • Distal leg/ankle fractures with neurovascular compromise
  • Clinical signs of compartment syndrome
  • Skin infection at the needle entry sites
  • Diabetic neuropathy or any other known form of neuropathy that causes reduced sensation in the sciatic and/or femoral nerve territory
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease
  • Known allergy to local anaesthetics or opioids
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Known diagnosis of severe cognitive impairment
  • Dementia and/or delirium (defined by a 4AT score ≥ 2)
  • Lack of capacity to provide consent and to understand the aim of the study
  • Patient's refusal to participate in the study
  • BMI>35
  • Body weight < 40 Kg

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sciatic Nerve block Arm (Single Arm)
Patients will be scanned with the ultrasound machine to determine the technical feasibility of sciatic nerve blocks. If feasible, one of the following techniques will be performed a) popliteal sciatic nerve block, with either lateral or posterior approach; b) CAPS (crosswise approach to popliteal sciatic) block, with either lateral to medial or anterolateral to posteromedial approach; c) subgluteal sciatic nerve block; d) transgluteal sciatic nerve block. In all cases, 20 mL of 2% Lidocaine will be used.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the technical feasibility of ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block when performed at Emergency Departments for manipulation and temporary stabilization of distal leg and ankle fractures.
Time Frame: From patient recruitment until sciatic nerve scanning (an estimated time frame of 30 minutes)
Percentage of patients for whom the block is deemed technically feasible by the investigator in charge of this task
From patient recruitment until sciatic nerve scanning (an estimated time frame of 30 minutes)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical success of US-guided sciatic nerve block
Time Frame: 15 Minutes post US-guided sciatic nerve block
Percentage of patients treated with sciatic nerve block who develop complete or mild- score 0 or 1 - sensory deficit 15 minutes post block
15 Minutes post US-guided sciatic nerve block
Analgesic efficacy of US-guided sciatic nerve block
Time Frame: An estimated average time of 15 minutes after the beginning of fracture manipulation
Percentage of patients manipulated after a successful sciatic nerve block who report Pain Max < 40 mm
An estimated average time of 15 minutes after the beginning of fracture manipulation
Patient-reported and physician-reported satisfaction
Time Frame: An estimated average time of 30 minutes after the beginning of fracture manipulation
Patient's satisfaction and Treating physician's satisfaction assessed with a 5-points Likert scale.
An estimated average time of 30 minutes after the beginning of fracture manipulation

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety Endpoint
Time Frame: In the first 48 hours post intervention
Number and type of adverse events in the first 48 hours post intervention
In the first 48 hours post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Santi Di Pietro, MD, University of Pavia - IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankle Fractures

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound-guided Sciatic Nerve block (20 mL of 2% Lidocaine)

3
Subscribe