Clinical Evaluation of Anaesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine Buccal Infiltration Versus Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block

April 4, 2024 updated by: Doaa Moustafa, Cairo University

Clinical Evaluation of Anaesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine Buccal Infiltration Versus Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Restorative Dental Treatment in Mandibular First Permanent Molars: A Randomized Clinical Tria

Clinical evaluation of anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine buccal infiltration versus inferior alveolar nerve block during restorative dental treatment in mandibular first permanent molars

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical Criteria:

    • Children aged between 6 years and 9 years having:
    • Mandibular first permanent molar with simple caries not involving pulp showing the following criteria: A. No history of spontaneous pain, pathologic mobility, draining sinus tract, redness or swelling of the vestibule. B. Normal gingival and periodontal condition, with no sensitivity to vestibular palpation, and no pain on percussion test.

Radiographic criteria:

  • No sign of radiolucency in periapical or furcation area.
  • No widening of PDL space or loss of lamina dura continuity.
  • No evidence of internal/external pathologic root resorption

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Uncooperative children.

    • Children with systemic disease.
    • Lack of informed consent by the child patient's parent.
    • Refusal of participation.
    • Allergy from anesthetic agent.
    • Acute infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group I (Experimental group) 4% articaine infiltration
Two injections using short needle and dental syringe will be given , the first injection is 1.5 ml out of 1.8 ml of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine (ARTINIBSA 4% 1:100,000) in the mucobuccal fold adjacent to the mandibular first Molar, the second injection is 0.3 ml in the lingual side for lingual soft and hard tissues .
Active Comparator: Group II (Control group) 4% articaine inferior alveolar nerve block
Two injections using short needle and dental syringe will be given , the first injection is 1.5 ml out of 1.8 ml of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine (ARTINIBSA 4% 1:100,000) in the mucobuccal fold adjacent to the mandibular first Molar, the second injection is 0.3 ml in the lingual side for lingual soft and hard tissues .

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success of local anesthesia
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Operator will record the LA as Successful if the scheduled restorative treatment was completed with standard treatment management strategies after administration of the trial anaesthetic. If treatment could not be continued after 10 minutes from when the LA was first administered, and the full 1.8 ml cartridge of the trial anaesthetic had been used, then the LA was considered unsuccessful
10 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Child behavior during treatment
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Doaa Moustafa: he patient's behavior will be evaluated for pain perception during treatment using the SEM scale (Appendix 3: SEM scale ). The SEM scale is an objective pain [10:04 pm, 31/3/2024] Doaa Moustafa: assessment scale with scores ranging from 1 to 4, illustrating comfort to severe discomfort based on sounds, eye, motor parameters
Intraoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Restorative Dental Treatment by Buccal Infiltration Anaesthesia

Clinical Trials on 4% articaine infiltration

3
Subscribe