Effect of Different Desensitizing Agents on Post-bleaching Hypersensitivity and Shade Stability

April 20, 2024 updated by: Ain Shams University

The Effect of Different Desensitizing Agents on Post-bleaching Hypersensitivity, Shade Stability and Surface Properties of Bleached Enamel. An In-vitro and In-vivo Study.

This study compared the effect of four different desensitizing agents on shade stability and dental hypersensitivity following dental bleaching procedure. The follow-up periods ranged from 24 hours to 1 year.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of 4 different desensitizing agents used after dental bleaching regarding dental hypersensitivity and shade stability. It was a double-blinded randomized clinical trial.

The ethical approval was obtained in May 2020 by the Research Ethics Committee an Institutional Review Board, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University (FDASU-REC).

The number of patients was determined according to G-Power program with a power (1-β error) of 0.8 (Power = 80%), and 95% confidence level (α = 0.05) using a two-sided hypothesis test. According to sample size calculation, 40 patients were needed for this study (n=10 per group).

Patients were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and were randomly assigned into 4 groups according to the desensitizing agent used. The 4 desensitizing agents were: After Whitening Mousse, Mi Paste Plus, Hydroxyapatite and Fluoride (ReminPro) and PAMAM.

Patients signed an informed consent and received a detailed explanation of the study procedures. Baseline dental shade was recorded using Vita Easy-Shade spectrophotometer and Vita Classical Shade guide. Baseline sensitivity was assessed and recorded using a VAS.

All patients received dental bleaching using In-office chemically activated Power Whitening YF (WHITEsmile, Germany) followed by a desensitizing procedure using the desensitizing agent assigned to the specific experimental group.

Dental shade and dental hypersensitivity was assessed at different follow-up appointments; 24-hours, 3 days, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 1 year following the procedures.

Assessment of these variables at follow-up appointments was performed by 2 external assessors, and patients were blinded to the type desensitizing agent used.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • El Weilli
      • Cairo, El Weilli, Egypt, 4393005
        • faculty of dentistry, Ain shams university

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with their entire upper and lower teeth, from right first premolar to left first premolar, present and sound, without restorations or periodontal disease.
  • The participants had low-caries index scores.
  • Participants had teeth with a Vita-color shade of A2 or darker.
  • Cooperative behavior patient and medically free.
  • Patient ages between 18 to 40 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious medically compromised patients.
  • Smoking, alcoholism.
  • Hypersensitivity to the agents used in the study.
  • Lactating, pregnant patients.
  • Patients with serious oral diseases, as acute necrotizing gingivitis, acute gingiva stomatitis, or those undergoing orthodontic treatment.
  • Patients with dental enamel cracks.
  • Patients who've had previous bleaching treatments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: After whitening mousse
30 % Xylitol, 4.2 % potassium nitrate, and 1450 ppm fluoride. Topical tooth gel Gel was applied on bleached teeth for 10 minutes according to manufacturer's instructions.
Bleaching of teeth using in-Office chemically-activated bleaching agent (Power Whitening YF) was performed followed by the application of the desensitizing agent recommended by the manufacturer (After Whitening Mousse), once for 10 minutes.
Experimental: PAMAM "poly (amido amine)" dendrimer
PAMAM-succinamic acid dendrimer, 1,4-diaminobutane core, generation 4 solution. 10 wt.% in water Colorless liquid The liquid was applied on bleached teeth for 30 minutes (according to previous studies)
Bleaching of teeth using in-Office chemically-activated bleaching agent (Power Whitening YF) was performed followed by the application of PAMAM once for 30 minutes.
Experimental: Mi Paste Plus
Casein-phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate with 0.2 % sodium fluoride (900ppm) Topical tooth cream Cream was applied on bleached teeth for 3 minutes according to manufacturer's instructions
Bleaching of teeth using in-Office chemically-activated bleaching agent (Power Whitening YF) was performed followed by the application of Mi Paste Plus once for 3 minutes.
Experimental: Hydroxyapatite and Fluoride (ReminPro)
Hydroxyapatite (calcium and phosphate), ethanolic colophony, fluoride (1450 ppm NaF) and xylitol Topical water based tooth cream Cream was applied on bleached teeth for 3 minutes according to manufacturer's instructions
Bleaching of teeth using in-Office chemically-activated bleaching agent (Power Whitening YF) was performed followed by the application of Hydroxyapatite and Fluoride (ReminPro) once for 3 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-bleaching hypersensitivity
Time Frame: 24 hours, 3 days, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and one year post bleaching

Assessment was carried out by a visual analogue scale (VAS), from 0 (no tooth sensitivity at all) to 10 (intolerable pain). The air stimulus was applied at a distance of 0.5-1 cm for 2 seconds by the maximum power of the compressed air jet from the dental unit. Then patients were asked to describe the intensity of pain by numbers from 1 to 10.

Sensitivity was measured before bleaching (baseline) and at each follow up period, 24 hours, 3 days, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and one year post bleaching.

24 hours, 3 days, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and one year post bleaching
Shade stability
Time Frame: 24 hours, 3 days, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and one year post bleaching

Assessment was carried out using Vita Easy-Shade V. Two measurements were taken for each tooth from the upper right canine to the upper left canine, and same for the lower arch. For light condition standardization, all shade measurements were carried out under natural daylight in combination with constant artificial light sources; the clinic overhead lights in combination with the dental unit light directed away from the patient. The shade of each tooth was recorded as well as the values of L, a, and b. The shade of the upper two centrals was confirmed using Vita classical shade guide.

Shade assessment was carried out before bleaching, and at each follow up period, 24 hours, 3 days, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and one year post bleaching.

24 hours, 3 days, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and one year post bleaching

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Farid MS El-Askary, Professor, faculty of dentistry, Ain shams university

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 13, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 25, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tooth Hypersensitivity

Clinical Trials on Potassium nitrate with fluoride

3
Subscribe